F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
1 e6 X4 [( T2 c$ e" CM is for his pride& \. r3 H9 i" a7 M+ x, D" s
L is for visiting her lover
; L  E4 V" r) h, s) ?/ w9 p7 g6 cB is for money
; z+ y6 A, L6 e1 t& J' _; q' M1 C; KS is for sex/ ]: R1 v  c% i9 @
except F, he can't get anything' x1 z- P! c" g/ [8 I' a0 o
but he just did something wrong for friends
1 `: i! b8 k  w4 _" N; z% Mtherefore, I wound like to support F) y: o) |+ H5 G+ `
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything. N& ?! J6 T" U" Z6 v6 M% }+ \7 R
$ L* J6 h. p( q: B! N  \8 `& q
from good to bad3 L! \/ e+ B* a; G* Z
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
0 L/ J2 Z& ]+ F2 M' L準時12:00" m7 i& s# k0 @( c- L

7 r$ L/ J9 K. `  n[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me' p/ q) n" D- G
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case- L; U9 ?. J6 D
8 s8 K. b8 B& M0 ^+ r- L: k# _
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?; Z! `) Z6 @6 u5 g: s

0 v% T3 _: }" r2 e1 H. sI believe this is very hard to be together. _2 q# Z* q4 ]$ K1 o- X/ s$ q
but I still trust that both of them can be together