F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves: X( p" L  F- O& T9 t
M is for his pride
  R9 a$ `! Z0 o% f  E/ u  _L is for visiting her lover9 u# j# M7 S3 o' m! ]
B is for money
& U' d! q' t$ Y; v3 M: }" }' a9 }S is for sex
* B; L& Z. _. V, @7 m. r$ `6 p1 B9 `except F, he can't get anything
6 f+ _7 ?# D% h1 X! a, M* U7 ~but he just did something wrong for friends
4 H4 @( T$ T4 Rtherefore, I wound like to support F
2 z* F& U; ]3 G# bActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything( [6 {. F- o. o9 Q$ `

. _: B0 B8 [( Ofrom good to bad
5 i3 R5 M+ @  |" kF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:: e; i4 `( a0 \, g
準時12:00. j5 T4 Q) {/ J$ r

; B0 E2 H+ i! \% A[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me7 n. B( I! H, [% p# o1 R3 }
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
( Q4 t8 B. ]4 v5 a, W3 g0 Y9 O$ _5 e( r' C& T
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?* U) Q  ]4 \3 k; P

3 y/ E. Y( h. \4 u# L1 NI believe this is very hard to be together
" h2 {# q: X2 W5 A& ]but I still trust that both of them can be together