F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves* {$ O! [  Z! F: V% A. ~; A: b
M is for his pride
5 M6 K5 J  z. V  JL is for visiting her lover. z5 M3 U* _0 `* t7 t$ I/ o" e
B is for money2 q/ H+ S8 G) O6 i8 v# D8 v
S is for sex
# g. t3 ?; K  C" Fexcept F, he can't get anything
2 U& d9 x3 ?6 g! B. j( ubut he just did something wrong for friends
: C9 ~7 m& ^5 Y, S4 N3 X. ~) Y5 h0 D  Xtherefore, I wound like to support F
! l( y* y8 i* o2 FActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
9 ^* e' v& X* d1 E( x9 x" b
) ^9 W! I, j" Y* T4 yfrom good to bad
+ g# V& z( n( H  X3 N, iF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:4 f0 Z- q" R% ]( Y8 C- \6 N7 a( `; F
準時12:00' O9 [3 b% e$ Q, k% Y* y
! \0 c; V- B; H; I8 @
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me+ s% a+ H- f& J5 m2 U
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case+ ]  X- c0 l$ d, [7 |
" m2 ~  ^/ j; _% K' g0 G
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?/ v5 \* P/ V3 [% Y; e

5 v9 @$ u/ j) D, O" q8 KI believe this is very hard to be together
, ~# S. N: s9 G  t7 O4 b( J! @but I still trust that both of them can be together