F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves3 P! D' A4 n3 `4 w( _' b! o
M is for his pride
% W2 b1 j0 q  ^+ e3 ?1 kL is for visiting her lover9 W& w; \, w5 w. Z3 _
B is for money2 e. I4 M: ~9 m
S is for sex$ s, q7 {! E$ U! r9 t3 h
except F, he can't get anything* f6 v  |( N0 E; S/ _8 m9 \
but he just did something wrong for friends
# o# u/ @# y9 ftherefore, I wound like to support F7 y" @7 Y6 O! y8 r& \; X2 @( t
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything. i3 A+ M5 e; @5 e2 f- c7 ~

4 ~" v. m0 k  {" Vfrom good to bad
6 j& |+ \  f+ g( ^5 VF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:4 K. E% I- x/ E, d3 E
準時12:00
' L4 N$ w# h/ G( K& ^" r4 y( ^) J& v1 u4 A2 G4 l) o
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
, F9 S: s/ c8 H  P8 p) f. rI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case0 G* N6 Z( j1 r- U) f+ |" y

& h% Q; [2 T" _2 h, e+ t2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?9 X" X5 e: [7 U+ Y% w4 n4 @& _
" a! x: n" I! h+ E$ Z
I believe this is very hard to be together
! P: |1 V: D* B' F# pbut I still trust that both of them can be together