F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves2 f3 d+ v8 ^: `) d8 _% y, x
M is for his pride$ Q3 D; r4 @1 ^
L is for visiting her lover
8 ]6 h9 `8 ?/ m5 N- F' PB is for money
* G5 f5 z9 j7 Z& r/ \+ R7 MS is for sex# Y* \  D. S1 g* C) a+ Q  t
except F, he can't get anything
! x; q) s, }7 o! H0 K; t; N2 Mbut he just did something wrong for friends) h& p3 t- G+ D0 X# N, D2 ]- p
therefore, I wound like to support F
6 u( S6 w0 @1 yActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything3 V  f6 w: \: d* }7 r- D  W
: Z; a* J' P" m  Y: @2 I
from good to bad
: E! S$ Z4 w' m. }F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
  b+ T+ r! W2 x. U0 ]4 U* X; |準時12:00
  Q5 r  {1 n' y1 w5 o- S+ X+ W& [
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
" E  [, o: S$ ?  rI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
! R6 O& X" r' l$ j5 r& `* u
) B* q( s! J) A+ S& L6 k- l2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
! F6 O( {; P) S3 O0 m+ u& R: {3 B! r3 z" v
I believe this is very hard to be together
, H, p/ I* f0 ]but I still trust that both of them can be together