F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
3 w7 j/ q/ K* v. c, }5 yM is for his pride/ h1 i" ]. C$ C3 }8 I
L is for visiting her lover' n: Z. |1 t: R
B is for money
4 A% K5 z: M+ v9 d) e. U9 uS is for sex
7 O) U. H6 V2 ]; vexcept F, he can't get anything3 Q4 H3 {0 G; L5 a  B! O, y( ]
but he just did something wrong for friends. t3 o# U2 T8 H1 H  `9 q4 A9 S& q* Q
therefore, I wound like to support F
. m$ R8 s+ C8 _' _7 F4 r5 UActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything; Q, Z" m$ Z- a( _7 \
+ b$ F; S2 \* z2 Z" f
from good to bad
4 q; K% r% i  ?( w0 cF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
& Y7 P- W2 b- S準時12:00
( ]/ p: ~' c! y0 Y; p
. s1 l8 B! f: I1 l6 c' O( u[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me! z& b+ A) y' P
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
8 J& k' Y& i  A7 d" a% y9 x& N4 O" M
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
: D5 ^: S& L  N/ t) |3 ]  n6 V7 k. F, f5 p6 z; x+ K0 x3 R
I believe this is very hard to be together
+ R3 l6 C5 U9 y/ ~9 _. @5 E0 Ibut I still trust that both of them can be together