F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves3 e/ Q* C$ ]9 c$ R$ M/ m2 H
M is for his pride
1 i$ @  |9 H. S% J2 r* H; K! VL is for visiting her lover) y/ Z2 |9 B' [' z
B is for money- {( x) @  ?$ h# I& {0 A
S is for sex
2 [4 x3 U. C) e; ^1 Yexcept F, he can't get anything# _0 m5 m% O$ w! M/ q, [
but he just did something wrong for friends3 x5 e. Z! E. m/ F( C- g
therefore, I wound like to support F
6 {5 A# V; m8 ?; W4 B$ CActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
- E" z- E9 [8 J+ \' I/ F1 l
# G# j* Y* L$ |5 Afrom good to bad% S! Y1 e9 ]1 t# Q4 x3 n
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
6 a6 n$ O  S7 w準時12:00
) W0 k/ |6 Y+ {
4 x( w1 Y$ Y% ~6 \[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me; F9 k5 W2 b3 L2 R- U7 `
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case& w6 y! j! @& P6 r1 r% T

4 h3 J. j" q! e1 e0 C2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?8 T+ i& f& m; o, S+ k

2 N" }/ Q0 ]+ a' r0 eI believe this is very hard to be together
  ]4 V9 \- \/ \but I still trust that both of them can be together