F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves% @7 A8 ?/ n: i$ t
M is for his pride3 [% g8 r; `$ c4 L7 g$ n0 B
L is for visiting her lover
6 k8 p, N! @8 h7 q& V+ G# kB is for money
3 T# d0 I; y5 FS is for sex
5 [5 j" s1 m# z9 Vexcept F, he can't get anything2 F* L2 l0 i9 x: H
but he just did something wrong for friends
5 j4 L. Y4 K1 P5 \3 Stherefore, I wound like to support F: Y3 w2 z4 w% G* _) e0 d9 s$ ~
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything( z6 u& V% a: @# g! I- L7 d7 n6 t3 n5 x
7 A9 g; U' y8 @
from good to bad
% D, C6 P6 q* U' b7 c" ^F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:: Q5 C' x. o$ f' W6 ^  C: u! ]
準時12:00: A7 w/ \" |1 a8 h1 A  T

5 D, z& p: [/ H$ V[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me% C' {7 L9 a6 o1 @! M
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case1 @2 S5 F  n3 e/ G

. r. v+ v+ ^2 u- h, z& C1 _2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?7 m- W8 T$ R+ }5 o4 w

7 _9 \! N9 c4 k: s. Z1 \I believe this is very hard to be together
4 e2 r( x6 p& h/ x1 |6 nbut I still trust that both of them can be together