F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
2 W! }' g7 u% n0 Z3 {" Y% ^M is for his pride
. H# m3 k2 D, a4 p4 zL is for visiting her lover
3 l3 [8 K! Y, R0 q& Y$ }1 M$ W* {# L0 rB is for money- j$ f" U) m7 C
S is for sex0 y& E! Y# M$ O! F5 t1 Y1 Q  p
except F, he can't get anything$ M" R2 @1 A0 r2 ~- @4 g" ]) \
but he just did something wrong for friends, |+ o1 d2 n" t" W$ s3 o* x
therefore, I wound like to support F
) t8 E8 x- B) ], R% OActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
0 p0 q' G( r0 K5 d( U/ e: B
# |; X6 m2 m# {1 T, ^; mfrom good to bad* R) g# A6 [$ U. q$ D2 q  L1 V
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
, @6 t  u% Z7 l) T3 X- k6 {$ [準時12:00( ]( \. f- E6 o5 G0 ]
6 V  _5 E7 u9 B
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
8 a' M  ~0 z: [; nI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
; f: T9 @7 k" c! W+ o  h! }- {4 a' L8 S( z+ K
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
, }) |7 [; E# Y) z( o  f' K  {/ k- B0 U
I believe this is very hard to be together  G0 {$ e$ t2 S: g* l0 \9 [
but I still trust that both of them can be together