F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
9 v1 r. ]# M$ Z# S; J/ lM is for his pride
9 N6 @7 H; d5 y0 [+ y6 y, pL is for visiting her lover
; b2 j! \  g1 x8 t4 P( h$ n& D% DB is for money$ Y! `  r% i9 q7 e( M; H) S
S is for sex
' \4 x4 t2 u! ]6 J% {+ j, Jexcept F, he can't get anything- p5 g% K& b" Q6 S& m
but he just did something wrong for friends3 R% r; u/ `& e
therefore, I wound like to support F3 f8 Z( B, N  r/ t8 b! @% D8 g
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
9 h4 j) g/ `) Y* M& U, x* W( [, `/ X1 R, ~6 ]  l/ {
from good to bad
2 [9 H) H4 p* |- u. fF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
$ l5 Q  \0 c! Q& E% @2 N: w準時12:00
, y. g( I0 [, `& Z
0 C( v) \5 \0 o6 S* v  k[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
2 v2 C/ A$ e% y* |/ ~- h  ~! K* ZI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case- p" j" p7 S! s+ K

2 H4 D# M  ?  ?% j5 T2 o. T2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?' f+ F8 ]' u$ [* z1 R& k. Z! f* E
( e2 p  i/ Y1 t- ^$ f# E
I believe this is very hard to be together: ?. t2 M# j3 i6 g
but I still trust that both of them can be together