F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
% e. h; R0 \( Z; K! a! d: JM is for his pride: v7 H# }- x1 `, @( k
L is for visiting her lover1 ~) |( J0 S! T9 }
B is for money+ a% Z4 c  }8 V- D
S is for sex
* L8 j6 u; j9 F7 aexcept F, he can't get anything
) n3 L1 V1 s" x' @# Gbut he just did something wrong for friends/ q% x8 f: N6 _2 a. [
therefore, I wound like to support F4 W% @  [  p7 K# @" S/ g; e
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything" m, z# D2 z& B# R8 U, k6 r( O# `5 }
3 }& q) h2 M; \. t4 B
from good to bad- r( b4 o; P" Y! e) g1 a) X* x5 S5 l  b
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
) }! \0 _' j$ X* ^& g2 X/ O準時12:00' F, T6 }" J, ]& a+ q% n$ z
: @& i' s# O5 r
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me; a0 M; K. b& s2 n! r$ i, y% X& Q
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
) F: e, m& M  W" W) I  o! \
8 W% t+ r) u' j3 \2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
# p: c# e- I% S% m
( R' P" n$ d9 W- m& H+ C- QI believe this is very hard to be together! s; r; [7 F  E
but I still trust that both of them can be together