F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves4 d1 @& |' n* J  w0 Q. y3 c1 i  z
M is for his pride/ S& F- \$ k6 }
L is for visiting her lover
$ M# A) K0 j# `- P7 @; v/ ~$ {. p6 ]B is for money
1 ^* j+ `( h# E& YS is for sex
' v% }2 I  x7 D+ g; J- h( b, Jexcept F, he can't get anything
+ A( T% ^' E0 U- l% \but he just did something wrong for friends3 {! X! Z9 |/ u. _6 ?" A* O% \  i
therefore, I wound like to support F
4 {3 _% F5 M8 {! [Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything) V5 v! y7 `  |+ T8 s9 b
; J+ H% @, R0 Q4 f* w- U. x
from good to bad
0 P- z6 T' M9 T, J8 J$ k, I, SF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:& G- o8 t" Q& f. S: U- @/ q7 n) R
準時12:00; z8 f9 q. y- W8 k+ A
+ G5 C- U  p. g: ~
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
3 v9 u& ]( E7 Q3 h) n/ dI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case' {7 z4 r9 {  T9 i& _# o

4 Y" Y  s+ b" w& c6 e2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
, A9 f! L8 E& c2 [& A: ?+ S. q; C: d+ W% a+ r
I believe this is very hard to be together0 o7 w- y  j! N' P2 \
but I still trust that both of them can be together