F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves! B' K: ]3 h  J& \$ S7 u; O
M is for his pride
! E2 s( {( H7 T4 E2 O# }4 c  hL is for visiting her lover; P3 H* k1 B5 ^3 D) K7 e( t$ b
B is for money) J6 }: i; _0 {5 p% c8 J
S is for sex
9 m7 w; ?) I4 @4 j/ N" v8 \7 u$ Vexcept F, he can't get anything
* s9 C1 D- c7 p" ]9 Lbut he just did something wrong for friends: C7 w. R( U" F/ k' d& M
therefore, I wound like to support F" S/ L! G6 k! O2 s% t: i. ?: C( L
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything7 H: V' b/ c, K! h' Q$ v

1 x2 ~0 U' i8 Q, M" Zfrom good to bad9 s" t* N. {, f
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
/ }' l& g1 {; f5 C1 G準時12:00; G* Y3 g( X$ y0 u
" @0 `8 I% ^7 \8 x, P  R
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
; {8 v" L- A2 ?5 ^I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case, M6 H7 {& V6 \( ~

: e" Q9 h& Z' c4 \2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?% y2 ]: N, F2 w7 Y- L0 ?$ e6 E

* y9 i1 }& }: UI believe this is very hard to be together
: A: {4 D8 G* Z3 I& q  rbut I still trust that both of them can be together