jsqaure99

true say, good example.8 R3 p! W' a% D3 q- A$ z1 R
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive." R7 G7 B" E4 T* H+ O& s; F
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
# F: G, ]2 M3 Y6 p) zno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕3 v+ v) ~1 ~: m1 G& g: p
NO OFFENCE
( ~" G% o$ S3 Y0 U6 U但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣0 S; s6 k9 m) t: Z1 h! W7 n5 b
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢1 }0 n6 e* p/ X. G) v# H+ n
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢: f" ?8 c) E  s8 p6 v$ n! l
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
" p$ `6 z+ c& F我唔知5 p4 b- ?8 H3 t% ^# c
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
. y, J# o1 b: p' }# _, ^0 T, @0 f會唔會覺得未夠班呢
/ }: {9 \5 {0 v0 g人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
9 n" {' }. ?9 R. H但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇' C  B: Q0 K6 W! k
又點解釋
4 l, A4 j  K$ ^$ n: c
& r1 P8 U  b2 h  R6 p, F仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
* P/ W/ u7 Z* ~1 ~( C+ |以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
2 o, J+ [; i" o+ n& Q- f) H* |家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材( u+ j1 J2 y& y, {) Z! y
講得好' {2 w: o1 j# ~/ ?8 `
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈6 W. l4 [$ q! j% C* [0 @
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:; y- j3 q+ E, E/ \# S. i& v7 C

! j$ [" y" a' S0 f" i
: D: q: P6 X6 ^# Q証據...係要証實左既先叫証據" Z3 N9 e. K7 v& C& U- y9 v9 e
" c- A0 m2 i0 R) [1 A6 o# x$ \' ~# J( x
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

, b  |: m* h& i- `  {; v1 `" ]7 ]( Q  y) ]% M
6 g) q/ r& k) W7 [
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗