jsqaure99

true say, good example.
, S2 ~2 y; H- y0 Z  s% |2 W- dby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.7 \8 u$ l) r" ]  {& i! P
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
, t# a3 Z' W6 D' A$ K: h. f! y. b1 rno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
1 W0 l& A0 `8 w- X$ wNO OFFENCE
1 F; U, m3 S, d* I- Q$ P但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
6 ~& I$ M) H1 z' ^5 i( u. g' U& i係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢  O3 H# H: u  k7 m4 C
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢% r/ p8 S7 n, }: B  I! \
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
& J! D2 N$ c( _2 C# g7 a+ Q; d  G我唔知& i# e3 z! Y5 ^: B# N4 L
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐3 k) c/ n' B8 z$ a/ k+ s
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
8 d3 R* g' L4 i7 P人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
. B% m# t* m) J7 {但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇  b& }8 K7 z' h7 z3 u# m
又點解釋
- B. v1 l& \2 V6 r2 N* X8 y7 \, ~  U' }, H4 M# |* ^( x2 m( P
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回) s0 Y/ K, B; G$ ^0 f% {
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到0 q2 Z0 X9 z: ?: n7 M0 y9 |$ J
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
% x# r* N: M* M& k% L講得好  n! S( d) W9 c
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈4 c; i( U+ r6 x4 n, i
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:* k% o: F" G: n9 R. I" m5 f
. P' f5 g7 f# A. s5 b* {1 {

0 d, N3 z' W" s証據...係要証實左既先叫証據# N5 z" `" y; g, q8 n( s7 \
7 A0 q  v6 |& ^0 o" s/ h5 X4 f6 a3 a
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

1 d( R% L; k5 l. O
7 V! A0 X( h3 `) D6 ?

* ?+ v8 X9 Y9 n! V唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗