jsqaure99

true say, good example.
3 l  R$ S& A% B; d- Eby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.# k9 i* y# X/ x; z% l. e
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.7 j4 _1 k* Z+ b. n4 F
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕- k% m+ Y( a" P  J' Z
NO OFFENCE
6 K0 i5 @. s6 H& _$ K但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
7 z7 p, m, ~5 t係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
4 V5 Y( d: u: \6 \2 O, ]IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
; h/ Q5 j9 ?2 O. T& DIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢: v' S+ \8 X' _3 ], y
我唔知  v# }7 F. l0 @
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐3 K2 ^. Z" n# ?( |! Z. N
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
8 n7 H5 J0 z1 d# O0 o5 t& @人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附+ G: b4 K7 u) v: g
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇" `% h0 @4 r: d5 J
又點解釋
6 V9 L# f5 s  T% W5 a0 F
) L" B, o' ^; t仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
' H7 _, `" P' I0 W6 m1 i以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到( p$ i5 F5 l) l5 B1 k5 B  y4 g' P- M
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
% o: o, B* z9 m講得好# \' k7 T0 F) M( D
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
- x+ w, ]3 V- f  t* V7 w8 A  Q# `我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
# ]6 m' X9 |: M/ J* X
. x3 C- ?5 K. a4 l% K# O$ _3 \: v+ _; ^
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據2 Y; e! Y! ]  ~; I2 K# v" a% k
* f9 N0 y. p7 ^8 t' M2 {9 L2 }
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

: J+ O2 e9 @) d  ~1 z- \
% U% T0 j, J- X; W0 R" `
$ s; t: S7 U0 \" ^4 [7 |+ C$ D
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗