jsqaure99

true say, good example.
3 g' F, i5 ]) R" r: R  |/ [by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
, v, A& ]% [' j8 E; mtrying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
0 z3 i$ \4 C  X9 l0 bno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
- o. z& b3 g4 c# q- N% @. sNO OFFENCE
9 D% u. E0 N" B- y) A但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
3 H2 }& O, l0 ^7 J. M$ Q1 Y! h5 v- t係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
3 a; c( i: j- `* b3 \6 E; Z* W6 pIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
# W+ p3 @7 B3 TIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
0 Y+ D: i9 H. H* h我唔知- X# E) I4 d6 q# J+ R
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
7 ^- O0 S. k: v會唔會覺得未夠班呢0 ~8 ?$ i8 q0 J; m8 r. p2 y1 p
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
! E  A% Y8 I8 f4 p! j8 s但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇! f( z8 \6 i- l3 P( j2 p
又點解釋& e/ j( T9 Y! I) \( t! g; t% r' |; u
7 f) J0 W  l; ^/ w/ R6 F
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
' _. A: ]% P& x& p. R: b- m以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
: ]. a, c% ^6 b. Z  o家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
  [, A3 S9 \  I+ Q講得好
; Q7 s0 w5 m& T, f; P8 f仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
. m9 [% W. ~) t; a) M+ u我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:: M" L9 D. G8 A/ A* K8 p  h

2 E3 ^3 w" D& Z, e# z) I9 U5 r6 B, o* m* f5 q
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
& h8 Q7 m4 m( i( i  z' N: }7 j
1 T) E; Y* ~( g用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

. ^- [" Q+ M& h4 p- U2 z& M
8 ]- t) H1 V6 y$ p6 A$ a- x$ l
' A+ u7 @2 V- o$ h( a唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗