jsqaure99

true say, good example.5 _7 P4 m9 ^" g6 R9 B$ w
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
5 V! y/ S  H. b( q# Dtrying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
+ ^5 V" @( h9 n& ]( X3 kno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
: u+ d5 d* b2 d& ~NO OFFENCE
% L( @2 z/ p( D9 X但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣/ m2 @, j. k  t& V7 E1 [+ [
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
: Y8 r2 s& S8 N. y" U1 C1 L2 }# _IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢9 E( r! w* P4 ~2 K
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢4 N  z- c" c2 _& U& M4 |8 E: }
我唔知
; }5 b( o& a7 V8 u  s4 y# v" G3 ]但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐! ^  N$ [: w. \$ G7 ^
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
% {+ Z- N- }2 b- M人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附& ^0 T# l) H8 O$ N# {, b
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
. t% c9 g, S, _# L又點解釋
* q% Q+ q- a" P8 f7 s5 L* I) c, D& E
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
5 L2 b8 M* z* [5 R以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到* J' s* X6 `/ d3 Y! f' s  X
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
) u, R: z' t7 ~; U講得好) p- ~  `+ d" \6 {/ K2 D1 K& V/ |
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
3 O+ N3 _% f" \我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:$ g9 W0 q1 H. ~' |
) t2 g: l1 c4 Y% M/ J8 s
/ o& q+ t1 b: m! V# t9 j
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據9 X; [+ `2 `* o  l4 g5 U
2 G" r/ g' A) ^  s
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

8 a3 V* e3 {! `0 b9 Y+ T5 C

# R; g+ c/ i! z! f- P3 \0 O1 E- @  F/ p4 c! F0 \3 a
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗