jsqaure99

true say, good example.
0 [2 V3 Z& R. d3 X/ X* ?* {0 hby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.* _$ {9 M& I: K+ P7 N6 I
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.& @0 x/ r1 x9 c4 P5 h8 n* p& y- W
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
0 I8 L% M0 p( G+ ]4 ]9 K5 BNO OFFENCE
) @$ Q% [8 v/ U7 G+ l; i7 ]但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
: @9 ?% ]5 [  X! s4 |係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢/ e% I, I$ N( e. z( ]
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
% O& f$ B6 j# J: {0 |# f5 bIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
% y7 G* _) N# T: R; w1 E4 b我唔知
7 T1 _( q3 G# v7 x& c& ~" K  w4 U( m但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐( I$ Q. G* _& n0 p  {
會唔會覺得未夠班呢  }6 s# @' o) W# F5 o9 L
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附! R9 c' A3 U; `! W) n5 N" B
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
& P: j2 o9 g; ^) i( O又點解釋
; N* b+ j) j! }3 Z) t
- S+ G# ?) |: c. V2 W" `/ G仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
/ s2 O, a7 q8 \1 Y) b以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到+ q0 y3 b( c4 I9 P5 y: ~) [
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
, {, O0 _2 ^8 c* ^* {講得好/ Y9 e; B3 [' u2 ]* R
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
( q/ a% ~% @6 {5 p( L我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:& W  ]% ^- I, ^- p$ O) |
5 P2 Y5 T% l2 B, G3 S2 V- G8 B
# S2 m. s' B# e
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
" ]6 ^' m$ F7 y4 p! t8 t: _$ |8 h$ O+ M. k# J( I
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

8 U: S" _5 L. v

( S* g* E5 [" @" P
& A% U  c! c; M# p/ r' E0 E唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗