jsqaure99

true say, good example.
( t4 g2 o9 \6 k8 r' E( ]by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
2 l* `1 g% }8 Ztrying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.6 d, X. l6 X1 ?  ?2 {
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
; Z6 a8 N2 R: {/ \& mNO OFFENCE + I  p+ y4 s2 N* H2 O
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
# C: K4 w  U" w' f- ]係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
" `) v; w2 T. ~, y7 PIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢/ E9 `8 m" E" m; U3 |. L: `# t
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢8 }6 \! |" L7 d  S/ w5 [, E  m$ A
我唔知
* n, a' u+ t4 z( A但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
4 A7 t2 s9 @, |5 F6 d3 g會唔會覺得未夠班呢
3 M- ^( ^; I. `人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附# |3 U6 U  r1 @; E' M' c
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
2 m" S, C! y% J% Y( x1 j又點解釋0 [9 R$ q5 r# N3 N

" y1 W5 J) G; w  u- t仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
; b4 O- w7 f& @5 C8 y以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
8 B7 I: d& G8 |/ [: H, }8 z  y) R9 }! z家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材& k0 z/ V; W( Q) Z, S4 ?
講得好
9 [( E- \6 V- F仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
) S# i! x9 X* ]' ~我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
+ h* I4 A: \: n& a3 o- w/ [: W; i( |( d; U8 ^' J/ ]+ T; V

! T! C: n+ G0 d( r) o証據...係要証實左既先叫証據  y5 t$ e4 n' E2 N! ~# `
7 F' |. D* e  x9 }3 z& u3 _
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

- g- h5 n- I% l" l

8 E0 ]* t; B: s' l
% z# Z5 U/ D3 _# ]6 y9 z. a$ b唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗