jsqaure99

true say, good example.7 z, P0 y( ?0 v
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.3 y' W4 h, \$ n% O* i. ^
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will./ `* Y4 r) [; f  p8 V) }) z+ O
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕% P9 F# x& a( l! Y& U
NO OFFENCE
3 H3 W( D! g! y: V0 t但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
0 Z3 N4 e+ B6 P; @9 |& o- k係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢4 i8 D% _3 ]; H. b) g
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢8 ?3 x& I$ E% U
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢0 N4 p7 f' o3 v# E/ Y
我唔知
3 Z- i* J$ x; d3 Y. s但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
! R% a8 x/ `% ~* w* W6 k. ^4 O會唔會覺得未夠班呢
; l) E# T( C: Q6 m人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附+ {  A# N2 @; g6 b. c4 q$ O9 r
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇' J: y$ ]( P8 o8 K0 _
又點解釋" x7 A4 I; E( b) r

) x% A$ r# W: M1 |9 t仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
+ v* s- |4 l" z0 M' ~1 n以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到& ?2 E4 t( W6 M: [/ r" G5 w; q5 j
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
" p1 P+ U0 t( b1 O講得好7 v! f4 o( `" m, s% w1 x1 L; |
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈: T; r1 l; }5 l8 ^2 m
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
" r& T- o/ L, o0 P9 P9 P" j* Z% ~) ~' v* t* F. b! i

$ Y- d% S% e( L" k! q* @: G2 S) D" q証據...係要証實左既先叫証據4 e4 {3 s( d- o
- A; k& `) l' @# L
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

! }% J& l- b! Z  N; }7 V9 u

+ t$ W7 A2 n/ o0 S4 v% X/ y0 x
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗