jsqaure99

true say, good example.- g1 S, V  @/ R; @. [
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.4 @4 |+ j0 V" M
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
, ^4 L9 i& m8 O9 bno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕7 w9 q& }3 r+ b& ~
NO OFFENCE * a* O( O1 N4 l1 ]0 b; W. _; F8 m) q
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣. ~4 H3 d0 [" U9 w8 S6 m
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢9 K/ b$ T, C3 p8 y
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢) d" \5 F1 \! `5 }
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢4 G% b! ^- M" R# T& e* D
我唔知
3 g- l/ _! a% `  d5 T& ], x+ l但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
& |) l. E/ ]" H2 q" u) ~$ |會唔會覺得未夠班呢3 x+ G2 g8 X3 E& ~( A( k; z$ d3 [6 H
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附# w. @6 A. k- z1 A. |0 s
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
9 z) S0 U, S+ s  H又點解釋
  p$ l, j1 p9 O* U1 Q
' R* a) {) F  W  O( P2 J; r仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回, ?* w- ~( E1 R* A0 L. h6 e
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
2 F1 L& r" R1 E+ V3 {: Y0 q' i家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
  V" f( {2 {' U' V講得好
+ j3 u; p1 ^# q/ K仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈$ y; K! N$ T8 Y1 F1 l/ J" y
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:7 x5 h3 q! F( x) S
- G- _, Y, y) M+ c

8 \3 g1 A9 y/ {証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
, P9 w  A' ], s2 \8 v! S1 W% M) k" X1 I% U2 |
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

! F  @7 {+ O. z% A; m
  D4 m8 }3 o5 D" e# `
7 o: j; \- m; d' r5 G/ |5 T唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗