jsqaure99

true say, good example.
4 x; N  l- r$ |4 W- gby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.( }( V" u$ h, Q3 p4 X' k
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
: l# N. G: n5 H0 o; A9 F9 }no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕  s8 v% @( O! u5 ~* k2 ?' @
NO OFFENCE
5 `6 U6 e5 {8 d; _. J3 M& S) {* S5 ^+ B但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣8 t' h! d& y% k- ~( N' l6 w
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
; t: L& g8 I& L0 M% X3 AIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
  \+ J- N" b5 ?, d, nIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢2 c% J# h* n6 D; b$ R: I
我唔知
7 |8 O8 }$ \3 N4 G但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
! q) s! y/ t9 ~! e' J$ v% W會唔會覺得未夠班呢
8 j" m- z6 {1 p5 f# R人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附. @2 v- v0 I: w0 |6 D! `, R% N
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
* S* C' x1 t' p- Z* [6 A' D又點解釋
4 T6 k4 S! R; L8 t/ v5 V; }& |  l
0 P* x2 C# M+ J仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
8 {8 C9 j6 K! b& g" Q- t" |0 _; @以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到$ c3 v- |5 e6 T' o; M% H
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材- i% D2 ]+ q  ?' o; p
講得好
  T7 Z% _5 [" d1 e8 f仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
5 f$ ~3 o8 a$ s8 C我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:! O( B) J0 E4 I7 Q" c+ H5 a5 @
6 x# Y( b8 }, s+ S% m0 F

* f  ?+ R! p$ R5 ]8 U証據...係要証實左既先叫証據$ D- S( f7 {4 C' d& `. c

8 K9 E$ w3 S; b! s' S( J% v用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

$ k* J# z2 z% ]1 I5 H

* [9 b( M3 {1 s, F! B
" q0 A7 X# @% c. ^' S; L: M  B& z$ w唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗