jsqaure99

true say, good example.
- E& V9 [5 N. Fby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
2 Q5 G9 p7 c- w& s* _; Wtrying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
2 t6 i2 ?1 ?+ u0 a2 p! a7 b8 @no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕, Q( y; P2 [  n& ~6 Q
NO OFFENCE + v; H* i' b5 {/ i. m
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣/ F" ]9 k" C- H; W% g
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
- w8 i  T1 b& p9 n: m8 cIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
8 u& @5 D& U5 PIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
& f8 |2 E  ^# n4 g我唔知
# I; C- [1 Z& V但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐1 Q- y* J. z5 U( [3 i; X4 ^
會唔會覺得未夠班呢! z3 t6 @4 z2 q2 t; e) h
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
5 B' a, V% P# ~5 a6 S0 }1 p2 _( L" s但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
' e6 {- [* @0 P- Z7 ^. \又點解釋8 x( W% m- k; ?0 a; n
, ^- ~3 Y. r& a% U% C' ]" x. V
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
/ R, K& T4 x: [# _1 M' t% t+ Q" C+ V, F以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到* ?) C2 |$ N- ]2 C: a
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材7 R1 M5 J* ?9 E2 m: d2 g% L4 c1 M3 z
講得好
" o& t# U) p1 j) s) W仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈+ }- ~- s6 H( f) I+ r
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:1 }/ \; H% d4 J. ^9 z. l

( m* }- f3 N. V2 Y' H/ M+ P& y
7 j5 Z# U9 h0 k  V: \証據...係要証實左既先叫証據7 D* A, C2 m! M

' D8 D  b: S5 B* j( B6 U" s5 l! L/ |用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

8 A. `9 A  T1 B; z# s/ S* m( D, B! t
+ B( k9 n$ U9 {% p( m/ q

6 M! o; U: P6 G0 v7 k% N唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗