jsqaure99

true say, good example.) G2 j2 U) u+ D8 a6 i, p
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
2 H0 D+ q8 Q4 c' N; a' l. utrying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
' Z0 p( n; W3 A: }1 u$ ?; o/ eno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕* h3 x: N1 T' S/ X; k; n
NO OFFENCE
  q! ^  G6 M- J但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣5 o+ t5 t- K/ k, M, x
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢: d  Z4 p% n: {
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢! a+ h6 B4 a. h/ r3 g( @0 ~9 }% c  |
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
; d/ o! E* `- m( Y8 G- ^我唔知
  [" k" i& J- i5 y) Q+ e( \但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐* ^2 D% D3 k/ r7 T: N) V
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
3 J- Q8 S3 U+ }! l人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
- A+ C2 {* f( l% F8 D但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇7 h; p8 r; p6 g  A9 L
又點解釋
5 u5 ?: \7 T5 l9 m* A2 {
! X7 M) Y' f; U6 _1 S8 v) `5 @仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回) j& d. B" K* H2 R# X: S
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到; G6 k0 Z( ]- t0 \8 @+ V
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
3 f5 n2 F* `# j& H5 y講得好
- ^" j' F- k9 A( z7 T2 Y仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
9 c/ x7 ?2 W1 I  }2 Q' Z3 |9 ^  S我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
/ N# `" a$ ~! T+ l( Z" i4 z5 T* \7 _0 ~
+ P( n' j7 m: l8 k: u& W4 P; ^
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據: a7 O, n( U7 I! Y3 ~8 v
8 ?# V6 Q5 k, A; k" n  S5 a* h' {
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

+ g3 I5 t; ]9 D& D% D

# h1 w, k/ c; S' B5 f: Q$ d9 C
6 e( G' m5 S3 i/ T唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗