Charcoal_henry

Originally posted by beef768 at 2005-6-9 11:52 AM:
聲最靚:      克勤
假音最佳:   克勤...

同意到極點～

其實克勤既唱功真係無懈可擊..... 何止"人肉cd機"~ 直情可以叫"歌俠" 或者 "歌聖" (有歌神阿sam嘛~~) ~你地有無睇<殘酷一叮>? 佢踩住鋼線唱歌都係同cd version無分別, 初初我仲以為踩住鋼線咁牙煙一定係recording啦, 但係原來係live, 我gf同死同我拗話無可能~ 死未?!?!~~

老實講, 十幾年黎... 我真係好少... 可以話無聽過hacken走音~ 雖然我個人係eason既fans, 佢唱功都唔錯~ 但係有時都會走音, 而走音或者唱唔到d音既時候就會"轉tone"或者加d special effect去演譯首歌~ 俾人感覺好似演譯得淋漓盡至, 好有感情~ 其實真係呃左你~ 基仔都一樣, 你有無聽過佢live唱"愛與誠"同"傷追人"會同cd version既演譯方法一樣?~ 講真, hacken要咁樣"演譯", 效果可以仲好過eason同基仔~~~

所以, 我覺得克勤既歌藝真係遠勝eason同基仔~ 而eason又俾基仔好少少~

我認為克勤同學友係同level~~~

[ Last edited by Charcoal_henry on 2005-6-9 at 12:20 PM ]

Charcoal_henry

Originally posted by cwc_tkd at 2005-6-9 12:36 PM:


同意呀~~佢成日都唔夠投入~
同埋唔夠放.(演唱會就一時時啦~~)

Originally posted by sniper at 2005-6-9 12:59 PM:
克勤出哂名唱歌冇感情啦, 剩係識震音, 我一d都唔欣賞佢

我唔係咁同意wor~

係, hacken係好似感情唔夠explicit咁, 我覺得咁樣係因為佢唱歌實在太輕鬆所致, 令人感覺唔到佢好"肉緊", 好有感情咁, 但係我唔覺得佢係唔投入wor~ 其實我覺得感情外露同內斂係唱法既分別jie, 我相信要hacken唱到好似eason同基仔都一定無問題, 相反則不能矣, 但係hacken咁唱會好唔自然..... 不過各有各好~ 其實欣賞hacken既同時, 我都覺得eason同基仔好好架

同埋我覺得有陣時eason同基仔既"感情激蕩", 係因為唱得好辛苦~ 而hacken就好少會好似斷氣咁~

Charcoal_henry

Originally posted by jaykfc110 at 2005-6-9 03:52 PM:


我都係咁話..冇感情仲要賴有感情...

唔.....

簡單d黎講, hacken既歌藝(講唱歌唔走音同清晰,走音係指"好明顯去唔到個音或者係完全唔compatible果d")應該俾eason同基仔好, 因為hacken真係好少好少"走音"而eason同基仔都會

而要hacken用eason同基仔咁"轉key", "激動"地演譯(suppose唔係走音), 應該都無問題, 因為只係控制情緒方面加d功夫

不過要eason同基仔好似hacken live唱到尤如播碟咁, 就應該無咩可能~

see the point?~