     
- 帖子
- 15894
- 精華
- 2
- 威望
- 9737
- 魅力
- 12
- 讚好
- 0
|
2#
發表於 2007-5-20 04:47 AM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:4 Z( ~9 ]$ s: o& q5 Q
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方) 1 w) [' X( m$ Y$ K; V! \Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
/ s- x7 f; d. p7 t: i' c我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方) 6 @9 V+ o. m$ d& nOriginally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:! X% @7 Q( C- c8 ~+ M6 m* P
* q4 b% I5 f, _立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。4 y5 |/ O+ a9 P. k# U0 X1 l/ J( r
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係... . ~7 b! y- g* q: S9 G5 d- G呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
6 E4 G( S) [4 q, }" J1 ]8 m/ \) \! W) B成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~" E7 ]- {1 ?9 g+ g8 e- M E' P; y4 A
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~ |
|