coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
" R% q! q( R, Q6 }3 l) `我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

; V. J1 @. c3 P

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:6 E& E" @9 k/ i! Z3 H9 j4 n
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

$ J, ]" r; u0 V* W& R; I! Z" q% g/ I參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
: i5 D6 [  U$ F8 H8 d9 J. ^
& W$ |8 R. x" x: J" S0 [' h( F無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
3 y( N& i+ j1 M0 Z8 O. ]# x3 T9 u+ Y" l
" S1 P% u' O( P, ~, {請珍惜會員戶口!~
% [$ C) m, ~- s% x- W  v1 t
9 r4 y( @" J8 m6 O- S: h+ Z& J  |% X- Y5 d+ K9 ^6 U4 t

+ J% ]3 B0 J2 v$ Q$ @) X5 D' V( q. N" `2 D5 E
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
; R' ]7 ]% P( n) |0 J4 B我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

1 a7 K" _$ z) r& k* y

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
' C& Q& p% Q' ^6 ^+ j我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

1 W, w( |2 N* n" E7 e# M

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:8 n  |# X+ j4 y( Z( ]8 C& m
/ _- n1 E+ p* i) q0 t
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。. E/ D, R$ ]) w6 u7 i0 O
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

/ D- i1 y8 N0 @! `( V% b+ e
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ # v6 t% ~6 N+ X/ z9 c. C" y
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
2 Y" `0 F2 Y2 k4 P有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~