coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
/ F+ {1 Z4 T7 n+ R* s我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

4 j" O: |9 k8 z# G

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:+ Q7 g1 n9 t; b* h! D$ ^
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

3 E. r% A/ R) _" D
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~! O: H& L; A2 F$ q

9 |# x( M: G8 M無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
+ ^; e  \5 w, B- w
4 i* y. Z  I+ D  ]請珍惜會員戶口!~  Q3 ~; G; n% j4 {$ |6 X
+ q+ F8 d3 m5 V* H* r

' C6 s% D" N9 V; m, m- Z) j
5 K, t8 J, L8 ]$ f4 t) D, ^: ~7 `' F9 p2 U: T0 _
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
7 w2 C2 S" ?" f. v5 S9 ^. Y, y& R我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

3 U# Q+ d! H& t: p

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:1 Q% _  S& f' k6 I5 z2 ~
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

1 n" e( z$ `& K) K

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:- n$ T! ^2 a3 ~5 q! X) P" H9 o

8 C% K4 Q! W' U; f2 U) y立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。9 u0 V6 v7 ]) p! \
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

7 g# m+ N3 x* F& E1 I# Q
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
/ o) x* @0 b, L1 U+ r( q成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
/ k9 Z! U' M' ^% s% }有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~