coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:+ ^( r3 Y8 Z" h- Z$ J5 O6 o9 u; X) P
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

# Z: q) M( b9 W6 N& s  [

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
/ L% Y# u9 m" J% C/ ?我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

. m1 y6 }! H$ d
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
5 l& d* u& U! u) P- P" R" F4 G
) Q% b! G, k) D) ]* [無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~4 |9 K9 }% S/ e/ S

+ E4 r- t) V4 ^7 ?* v( B/ j3 y請珍惜會員戶口!~- `7 R! X! X( g4 F* Z1 d5 r
1 o/ J& ?- P+ _8 g

: ]3 q* ]$ f- K! S( f6 d$ J0 [5 s2 n7 y# r2 `4 c" |( E0 O

* D, d  S1 }% [+ k- u講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
' F1 g& h  N/ B" c我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

0 w5 @* K4 h$ A; g" ?

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:8 C2 r0 d4 ]5 E8 V! p( s
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

5 g, W3 H- H  e: M2 P% B

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
: M3 {/ N) z! d  ^/ y2 w* u6 C6 \
) W% S) B* e+ x) d* P  G& p( D( c立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
) Z# ~4 {- w# j& K咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

' x0 A# e2 R" |$ h2 W呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
0 c$ `$ ^, p! c5 `- }4 ^成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
2 _& l, k7 U% _; T有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~