coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
. j; W8 ]) [0 \" i0 ~我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

6 n9 s- P, `. w; A1 D: W% }4 E. a; b

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
! w% ~* u/ Q8 ?, M5 B- G我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

0 e, y9 f* t$ V! _: m6 v0 `
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~( O8 B& V% t# w+ d: ]6 j3 V
# P/ j1 [, s; H2 b
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
9 ?- z& ]% a8 c( [; e' G0 c2 ]- b5 [, \: Y% Q  c8 a
請珍惜會員戶口!~
1 N; c3 z  [$ ?! k! Y: D# M+ S& H. q8 ?$ h: ?+ ]

. ?5 F. A, W: {8 O8 I0 e/ X+ B4 p3 ~( P8 ]( G) P
- Q) v$ R2 V  ^/ w% L0 w+ N
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
) s# F  j) j2 F, S8 c我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

2 L: u9 T% i7 C4 R' O' Y

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
  D6 z2 l' \3 i# U我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

; t3 A6 E$ q' M$ v, t

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
0 f' [0 j# u8 }2 l0 {; V: ]4 ^4 h7 W& Z. F. [* P/ M- L+ k: n; G
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
; a% R3 \- F3 n) z7 y咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

& v0 R* ]2 }/ [' x
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ ! T9 B: p3 a) Y5 b" G! f7 z
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~# `, O( @3 j, r! R* C
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~