coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
( g5 _! Z. L# [我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

  @9 ?5 P: N* r# w/ f2 E/ U

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:6 Z  d0 O& m2 m  O. O
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

  Z* R1 N4 }" V9 i( Z參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
( ~0 m% ^- j' ?) ~7 M5 r
, x% ~2 U! s- ~0 R無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~: m9 A% D& T8 w
( `2 w+ X# O1 f' X7 R" w
請珍惜會員戶口!~
- |4 V3 D4 s6 c2 U( `( Z9 K1 H4 \) X

* v; r4 E( a) g& a& g
0 S/ T& m' `  R: v
  V4 k, A, I& ^7 W講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:. [0 S  y6 E: o) n# D) k
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

! G% h) P( y0 D+ G! i

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
3 H1 {( J" {7 ]% Q0 h我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

' S1 @! }4 K# o1 h( D% G9 G7 p! s5 M

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:: h7 v! Q2 K: i
( s8 z( \& {/ I7 l7 V+ c
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
, [5 D( F! ^  e7 ]' o0 R& l咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

& n  D# n. f( [2 v) [/ v
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
0 w% e6 O0 z6 q) h成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~7 A: {2 l% t: u* u& u3 d1 A
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~