coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
9 Y' h. E. u# \' s2 A我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

$ t% D, V: M% E: F2 D5 L/ T

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
6 J* @" y7 q* U9 t5 I2 g3 V' ]* b我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

  J+ C; N$ l2 B& D" e$ ]
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
/ \1 v& _8 {5 T9 M1 K
! Y2 C8 |. [8 l: t4 a  s- \. I無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
: [( ^2 Y. a1 A, Q2 n# Z( ]6 y, y
請珍惜會員戶口!~8 Y8 |$ `' k7 r
/ e: k; @" q2 a/ [- k; K

) Q" p( q$ T7 e9 g& o+ N" d, d
  h/ C+ ~& z; }- R2 _! O+ h# n2 \) e% Q
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:5 d- g9 y4 O- z5 w
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

* h& \$ e% O% r# T

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:8 {5 g( B1 L) c' [' h- U+ K3 O9 b
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

8 n1 j8 ?% ?: m1 g$ Q; W

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:6 k; i& M0 d& x3 _% X. z
6 L9 |/ k, r  i' `6 C
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
* t4 |0 e: o) B+ r咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

+ x# U4 t# {9 I* v" c
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ ) _+ H0 p; @* z5 l6 ]* L- C# z
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
! m- }9 K3 L, S0 J2 l* x有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~