coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:$ }" y! }$ ~, |% a& }/ T! G2 H0 V
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

+ |' @! ^$ y! d9 ~9 Q

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:& }' r1 n- g6 }9 {% ?
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

6 p8 M+ b* ?% |1 l3 A) ?) S參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
$ M8 c- i* x4 c! |) A0 K" b8 C  L
# M  f( f$ ^& _& p+ W% `8 U無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~7 f; ?) K7 C2 k

( d0 B1 y# N2 H7 O, }請珍惜會員戶口!~, E2 N6 i, L5 j
1 U* Z, b8 L6 a! x/ {4 I/ ]
$ J: l4 k5 ]" i  w+ {6 b5 C, u

* Q6 G4 l4 w/ R
" y7 [. h0 C: h/ A5 `' w4 w講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:% p3 E( C7 w9 x% `1 b8 ?
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

: T/ n& i- g' M; S% _: @4 t

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:0 U0 Q% ^6 N; {' L
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

1 u( X% y/ u' \9 X$ L7 l( V( \3 a

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
5 w6 |# I+ A$ L' A+ a3 L3 h0 T. |0 Z) k( W2 a: ~- }
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。: U* z5 s! V( i( Y0 r' G6 N- p+ L! Y4 @
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

6 ?9 Q+ W) L% S' L* C* v
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ % K) j8 ~5 [6 k1 X3 O* P
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~! x# A. w  A& ^7 @% d* t& H1 l
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~