coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
0 g, E4 k9 i' X我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

1 ?* a2 f  `; b8 s" H- Q0 B; t% }

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
- F8 S, d" X( \: K) f& d7 G我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

0 X9 P! ~- o6 [) r9 c7 z7 i% s
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
' k. t  s- S+ U( Z2 M( w, y1 S* g! @! N0 h( p4 Q5 r
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~) E, D: `4 J% D' f8 C

5 K; I; s4 N' B3 {請珍惜會員戶口!~5 d4 W! ?& f) U' d0 y
) }1 ]# O* A6 R# u

4 _, F! e# }) d/ M0 [) M- K; [% Y8 D1 e- K; c1 i8 d
+ Y* c2 Z% }: Z5 {5 i1 y
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:6 W5 I7 E5 G, J! i" @; ~2 J
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

$ O, t/ `8 O' y( i( ?1 S* y7 v

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
6 ~6 Q/ ?8 S6 X0 K我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

- M4 K$ ~7 X( {1 ]+ p

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:, {  w% k& T5 n* ~8 u1 C
, ]$ C$ H/ p* M+ W0 y, Q( M- Q- V
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。- W* a6 L) b$ `: `$ S
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

+ j: J9 A7 I, l
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
7 @) \9 Q& g3 w& I: r% }% |成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
; h6 C2 a( x: i6 V1 s! ?有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~