coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:/ J7 {  h" M( q8 O- ?" z1 I
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

+ U8 d/ P: f# l$ K5 e9 v& |

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
9 ~* U8 X7 H* |5 g我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

/ `( q3 d! t) g
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
8 B1 a' i4 M' A  N" k- k. E8 \" u9 i, {, d$ \
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~% S7 R  n, j( t2 G* A8 r, L

+ J; X0 O& ]! Z' A! R. {6 {請珍惜會員戶口!~7 V4 q- N( {, t9 h7 P' g

# C- l( S9 T$ c' _) z4 ]
8 ?. |8 m: b; `! a9 f
2 I/ N) b7 k% j2 ]& m: Z& q4 x# Z1 Z& C8 c7 x
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
( S# r) N! |- w! Y! H  ], m我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

" G* E3 I# L% Z/ A* ?

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
: e; q6 t; Q4 x! X" S& y: @- B我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

$ C$ \9 i4 e, w

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:/ n- L% |3 u# d+ q; G& x& o
# s4 }- A7 j, n. k7 }0 K
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
( k, }5 `. S, L, w& K咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

9 Q" t+ ^' T* `! Q6 f& s, y呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ ! R6 K5 b+ f1 }9 w# ]+ E7 @! G
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~6 ~6 a9 b2 m3 o" n
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~