coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
, N0 O, b1 P3 _我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

0 ^6 B) T6 `7 _# O" O

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
! ]1 r3 j9 O1 h0 d- \我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

; C" H4 d2 z4 v9 M/ z. S8 [2 I, a參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
! q/ Z, x; S7 M  ~# W8 h& w
8 U; K2 a1 L8 ^' {) Z7 {無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
0 d2 d4 {5 F% n9 Y: `0 H& d$ c) ?5 y" i8 Q$ W6 ^
請珍惜會員戶口!~7 F2 {+ S0 J; p) Y3 y8 Z. F& n5 w
9 u+ z& ~8 K8 S. p/ B1 n8 _
. O2 J: z2 V1 T  X" S; j* [3 C

# Y+ M* s8 G. U% G  e* L4 b3 i1 T# K/ Q" f
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
0 h* i0 x0 t2 R* d我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

: l2 h& H0 P% ~

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:) w9 E  H; `6 [9 z
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

, e) j, ]0 [2 O; k5 _; b0 S

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:& ~% V/ C. o, v3 b2 w6 B
) s0 W$ r; \2 y0 X
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
' j, ]5 Y- D+ r, t& ?, \咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

- O5 y/ A- r9 i, W' e* K. K+ _  [
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
( i9 S4 j1 p8 Z, _, n成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~  {  ^! k8 L/ K" G
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~