fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-17 12:43 AM:

同意~
如清揚所說, james = 1.5 t-mac, 條數真係幾難計, 所以要換佢都幾煩

呢個我知呀  ~
但係 2 trade 2 果個我的確係死得太多..........
今次你信我吧, 呢個3 trade 3係幫到你嫁 ~

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-17 12:53 AM:

加 james v t-mac 我好似蝕左喎

冇可能 ~

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-17 12:56 AM:

2 v 2...
alston 轉 m. james 會唔會幫倒你?

如果 francis 來投, marbury 可能會轉做 pg,sg, 所以唔敢放俾你

轉變不大, 出 alston 搭佢地反而平均得多 ~

同意, 所以我唔敢選marbury, 一定會浪費好多時間 ~

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-17 01:01 AM:

你竟然覺得 alston 好過 m. james?
m. james 可補你得分

對我黎講, m. james = 暫時o既 marbury
alston 就仲升緊值, 我都唔知佢最top時可以點

m.james 比較好 ~ 但係出左佢我地之間既range仲係幾大 ~
所以先出alston, 再搭佢2個..........

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-17 01:09 AM:

2 james + dbt v nash + t-mac + Z
依個係最 balance 架喇~

nash 真係唔敢放住.............paul 真係咁唔得咩 ???
佢都出返啦........到你手時相信已可回勇 ~

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-17 01:13 AM:

因為 nash 可以換 iverson 嘛~
而且上面個trade真係岩岩好, 你仲可以留番個 sg 添~

我唔得...............sorry ~
出paul已經諗左好耐........
nash..........真係唔得 ~ sor

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-17 01:21 AM:

咁我訓先喇
希望聽日 alston 打得好d, 爭下氣啦

即係唔得 ???

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-17 01:23 AM:

3 v 3 差少少

真係咩............仲有咩要求 ???
你考慮清楚吧.........真係幫到你呢 ~

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-17 09:35 AM:

t-mac 轉 howard 會唔會易傾d ...

paul 只係小事 ~ 仲有機會出明星賽 tim ~
sbk 不可傾.........

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2006-2-17 07:34 PM:

諗諗我個條件low

咩條件 ???