fantesticming05

G.Wallace 放假後出得.................真令人期待 ~

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-17 11:31 PM:

點解咁問?
有得諗, 睇下你換邊個先~
好似成隊波換咁, 不如交換acc黎玩呀 (講笑)

我要埋另一個James ~
howard trade 埋 bell ~

睇下清揚個陣就知 ~

既然已去到play-off, 比你著數又有咩所謂呢  ?

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-17 11:41 PM:

m. james 同 bell 一齊走我會好危架, 成條3分線俾晒你
咁我唔俾清揚囉

我得分死左, 只可搵試下搵3pts.........
整體上已幫左咁多, 你就比返dd我啦....

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-17 11:41 PM:

m. james 同 bell 一齊走我會好危架, 成條3分線俾晒你
咁我唔俾清揚囉
佢放走 iverson 都會冇晒分姐, 駛乜驚

right ~

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2006-2-17 11:44 PM:

我也幫左你兩鑊,幫多我一鑊罷

我咪放緊 law..........

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-17 11:49 PM:

你叫好唔好俾佢喎

到時你自己睇下個形勢後決定 law.............連我都睇到, 相信到時你下到決定既 ~

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-17 11:53 PM:

我冇乜留意~
iverson 換 nash 都合理呀, 何況佢又幫過你
不過我會尊重你o既決定o既

anyway, 等我計計數先~

我冇決定d乜呀...............
我唔換返AI只係覺得咁樣好似冇咩意思姐.........
既然合理既, 不妨考慮一下 ~

fantesticming05

講返個trade先啦...........你點睇 ???

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-18 12:02 AM:

trade 完後...
pts +3.9
3pt -2
...

你都冇 reb, 和你點傾reb呢..............
所以咪咁 law.......
話左係幫你..........now 清楚曬啦 ~

[ Last edited by fantesticming05 on 2006-2-18 at 12:07 AM ]

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-18 12:10 AM:

冇左 howard v bell, 你就嬴倒 reb, stl, blk, to; 我嬴 pts, ast
對你數d~
唔駛幫我, i prefer a mutual benefit trade

咁都係幫緊自己既...........I mean 唔好話只得我有著數 ~