奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
+ |+ x- {3 `5 _0 {4 k* Z+ R  G
3 g$ y, W" g0 R/ S# ]: }' iagree,
+ G9 w2 x- q1 S$ X$ B( H% r3 h我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
0 ?" J! @  w- S0 g1 d$ O但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,( [% s, x! ?3 Z- D! j. T8 e
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

  E: i0 N% _4 _. _& j2 x/ Mhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html3 L' ]1 P* q7 k3 I/ G  g
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
( f2 |- ^1 j- C搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media./ K# B1 K" b2 ?% h9 _) d
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
5 V8 L' j. E. H0 Q有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ ! V/ t# W" m0 m0 _

/ `9 W- E1 o: [9 P係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
5 ~0 F) v* j0 z' w" p+ r) D# u. [6 g+ ~  k5 l1 j3 x
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

8 L3 i0 c8 h* Q! s( q6 K: V& \
3 B8 R5 b. y, b" X絕對支持啦
% W7 X8 a7 Q; |1 F( ]' d8 Y  d: L# i  m! k! ~! `$ t+ K( w
有錯就認,打就企定5 {; ^8 w! ?( y) y. V

( c1 R( a9 w( _* `) J無錯當然要撐到底3 m0 ~( Z+ F* U' q

( z  n9 K0 |4 f! y- O但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
' h& J! ?( _2 K3 m8 [
) L1 p, y; s1 T在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得6 Z2 v5 {5 H( w. l( Q  L9 z

3 \7 p% i: L1 p+ q1 v& K( N一份公眾讀物係好有影響力) h, h' c8 {" g: i2 ]1 M3 F

. b) s) b! _" R/ a- J( ~) x我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生  P# H. U5 [" d$ n. J

! f6 ^* w  P3 J唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?, X4 Z3 N1 v- d1 _  s
4 H8 Q( s2 E: ?' y7 u- ?3 S+ o
我唔認為lor! V, H7 z* Y; S7 F1 E6 l, B

6 ~  Z+ [: V  @唔係話要整死佢地
- k; U6 _3 x5 @4 s  j
3 x" @% u( ?3 N8 p' G, k$ `而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
! q2 L1 \$ ?  I* S3 U6 O
1 N0 T6 Q% ?" M# ~+ Y% v8 e我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大" _, r. ~8 \" h3 e% q  u8 n  H7 K7 i
  c- ~& M# k& ]8 |( I
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
2 P+ \$ ?0 R0 `! J# @5 E/ P' N# o6 P4 H7 b; n6 t
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由, e6 h0 `# q7 u
7 Z. p% E% `* ~2 Y& V
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
. Z9 q1 {2 {. y% I3 d* e% v* R"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
9 G7 ]( O2 ~; J4 M& F
+ k; |9 S( m* G) L5 E我們的大學生" T2 H" f) ~6 _' ~$ c

/ J" A) H7 p/ @6 Q: d* l/ M- ]% J" O- f' x7 k

/ |. Q& s) Y" e& Z+ o2 T- B) K5 T0 j# W2 P! j- L# |: K$ h

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:. U4 S; U" k% B8 N7 l" B- v& U

/ u& Q2 Y4 z1 ?1 d# l9 L$ z5 X* z7 {! k2 W* n
有見地 !!!
& K0 V3 F0 O: ?: u) z現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html. z2 n! q. Q- n  g3 X5 n5 k

8 b% j' E8 E) E  c7 ^I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
  B, `2 o: v$ M/ d1 F0 mI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
& |& h4 s  E/ p  ~7 WI pretty sad that about the University official.; V2 e6 f1 l' d3 u. u: z& b
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
( C  \9 J. B$ [4 \$ i
# S' A9 L6 \$ y* ^[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:0 _+ l3 {2 s' G1 t/ M$ R! H
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
) U  _: _6 D' j1 ^$ n: @
9 Q* w# S4 X- m0 E[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

+ k$ B% i3 e1 p& z" U

# b/ C7 g# o7 g  P兩者有何分別?
1 v- q; I4 E# F' T0 D* D9 c8 h中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?