奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:3 d' T$ I+ O- c% x  u4 i( n, @1 c
& m8 Y( k8 G2 p
agree,
: ]0 E% K, K' J2 U我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主," ^( u0 K) I& ^" D& ?6 j9 b- U
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
6 n8 D- E8 n+ X期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

9 C% h% x; Q- c% c( uhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
) Q& l4 f$ [. y0 j& I2 x已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地* H- T9 `- @# v
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
7 G# E- z0 W% _- m; O, U& {! a1 ?/ H# {Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:" \( n# w3 K; R1 i) s4 {0 T' c
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
: x. M" l5 [& X7 @' }( s; H7 B6 p* p# s; q
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
; d3 }1 g5 Q8 r# e5 d2 ^8 D
5 W9 [  y( A8 U4 E) g; F0 Y' W; p為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

% @: Z+ j( [9 u0 F
2 o" V) U& ]; V, q# r/ ^& j  y" D
絕對支持啦# U( h: j. H& Q2 E9 m6 {- M

5 W( T4 C2 w* Z0 m& a( {有錯就認,打就企定
3 r# V) W3 D/ W$ H. ^% p9 r" n! H5 a7 M' L( ?
無錯當然要撐到底- |5 k  v5 Z0 t* z" u
! g! b/ f" d5 f/ W: ?
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
+ Y. @! F1 o9 ^2 M8 K0 D; M, B3 |, }; M
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
# [" F; }+ t3 b/ {. C9 N# n
$ Q% e5 L  J1 Y! ]* n4 }一份公眾讀物係好有影響力( W9 g/ g& s) [( F  E

8 F% _/ B2 }  N/ p我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
' C( `- e7 Z* ^( @& g
% @8 V4 L  V1 z% j# p7 b6 N- a唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
9 c% \1 H3 S4 W: ?0 X
4 _0 [8 A) D/ z- m/ o9 E$ Q8 ?- N; ]我唔認為lor6 Y* G( B# A0 F9 ?4 k( k2 [
2 Q) v* K( W- \5 i! ?  l9 s0 w& T% u% @. i
唔係話要整死佢地! d  X7 W" d2 f1 a2 @, P
  w& P. n+ D/ w1 l/ d6 }  _
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用" g3 L( e& P9 o2 U: D3 _

! ]+ ^- u( \5 x8 i$ P: v* b我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
1 P0 r" }( E/ T7 {0 E! _
' d7 Q! m: R5 C8 ~, E有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
4 I8 {9 N; w& g, ]
# S* _5 ?: d1 v: G5 c+ c3 z唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由/ [3 T+ ^2 C6 W3 ]9 H
' Z% t4 t3 x' B. O% N! |% T
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句( J% ^' q, ^# d3 J
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"! Q3 I* J, k" W+ B
+ A4 B  w# c) f3 L2 k, L
我們的大學生, l' q/ H0 f! }$ Z/ S* l+ J" u

/ q) E- R/ P, F& T; Q: c
$ l3 ~2 d( Q! H0 T( i
/ h* g, u* h# n( H& T
1 k5 U2 n1 e6 h* V2 i' i6 S

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
- A& |7 {% ?! R6 m" Y9 ?6 P5 \0 v; C& ?9 x' E* g9 w$ }5 l

+ c! T4 S3 x" C1 y  E有見地 !!!, M; V$ `& E8 P
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
% T7 S4 z5 y% U( D8 K6 {1 l
9 d1 ^2 o/ n6 p" jI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ) v# p, p$ _/ b1 N  V
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
) z$ j8 ^+ `$ r. UI pretty sad that about the University official.
% e. ?$ |1 N  @: I* AIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
5 L4 Y. b5 l5 g6 `  X' ^
; F9 _1 c/ Y' o% a( \[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
$ Z# i& B! E0 p: K5 Y我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la1 g5 P: ]" o0 _4 A+ ]

! Z" X7 h: Y1 l# Y! M[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

9 c& K/ l: _( k8 T0 J3 [
* B6 x  z+ o; J) _0 d. T1 ~兩者有何分別?7 g" r% S& b1 |, y% p* d- [
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?