奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:2 H7 B" O' P/ L1 R/ @
" {# c- ]4 B+ u& s7 e3 o' [
agree,
3 w8 t5 y5 p. r4 a, v0 p我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,5 T* ]" `  I0 p' y% ]
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,1 Y; U# r2 i* V0 |$ _* c% K# c" x
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

* j& T  J. x2 R
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html9 K) i2 M$ |* ^# v) g6 W& _8 L; i0 b
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
/ O9 L1 |; L6 i$ X& T5 D  [搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.- M9 ^5 I# h% r$ q7 l- z: F
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:) U2 r3 A( B, I% g* B7 D& d
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！   r" H) i* h6 r$ y- n9 o

9 N: V5 [  w# q+ N5 R/ X係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???) x1 q# o9 C$ v' }- _  Q- N" `

. S* A$ a7 `7 }) X! T為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

; |# ~  k& q/ x+ y8 [9 Z# n4 K( C
8 e3 S5 U$ s; F, K5 p" z
絕對支持啦! L) m8 |1 s( m& U, P# Z# i

& u1 z8 H, R8 U9 U4 [有錯就認,打就企定! b* \7 y9 Y' h2 j
7 q* o0 v( L& H) a- s7 ^. z# V5 c
無錯當然要撐到底6 g/ B. Z4 `6 v5 \* p) B  B

- k& ]1 |4 c+ F$ d7 h. X但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩5 ]/ X1 ]' @. j3 F& [
  C& }2 b+ v% R: _. z( g8 s/ d% i) Q# X
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
- d8 m; [1 ^% J5 G  \5 P- F5 j/ V- f+ O+ E  l
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
- F0 w& i4 {* G5 d/ ?" [2 m
3 z, s2 C& Q- g, o" R4 L我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
/ M; m6 H( g: Y
+ n0 n, `# I2 z" T1 i, m1 t唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
6 r9 S: F& o5 ?9 p5 @- U  E5 W: X" j( M2 g! ]2 p9 d, C
我唔認為lor- @) h7 m* q% |# r( N3 T# e1 C
) [' U3 h1 x  n: q1 w+ `
唔係話要整死佢地
4 l8 y( D# `# B) G' T& h7 t+ C+ I: b; [8 J' |
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
! S1 Z$ q1 v! n: U4 W
5 u' |6 {) C; F! K& l1 G0 j- i我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大+ g" H+ a5 D' v$ L% n; F; n6 g
+ t3 P! k# B3 x+ L: H6 r( E
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
7 J3 c5 F% B' M
- c) ^/ v: |4 Y8 Y; f/ k唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由! t$ L  t1 s4 T# M# D9 k* a% O

0 X- O" ^1 d, p. G大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句% p+ h9 g9 X: m: L% e: c$ P% V
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"7 ?7 s- ^+ x3 ^# y9 a0 Q2 F

) a" B/ M! p! f9 p我們的大學生+ V* e- p- ]/ I5 ]( u9 S4 K9 b
/ d* r4 H- C4 R, o; z- ~* w

* C0 {+ `! J( {2 K
; ^4 Y7 _( b+ L# w+ q8 y6 B8 U( K: S/ \  W3 P

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:, W0 r# d  j: L1 {

7 U# ~( u- ]4 X0 {) }& P3 ~6 Z1 ]8 H+ R
有見地 !!!
9 C3 c1 x$ M# B4 G6 T現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
2 v. \6 J% x- D$ @: J; Z/ ?% j! U+ p2 }" w9 n4 ]# \3 _# q5 b
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
( l7 _* W, L; {0 G% Q( p$ _/ U6 Q6 `I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. # U) y' N4 W( C0 X! @: k8 L: e8 Y
I pretty sad that about the University official.
2 B3 e+ M2 ]" N1 h8 M9 k! eIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la+ s' S) I2 @$ b9 Q, \3 ]
% C. O" K" T( J2 V- @
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
$ _7 h& N) r7 y1 j* D1 ]我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la4 R; ]- q1 k  _, a  m

0 K  E6 D6 l$ T; C, b& Z# Y8 e[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

1 A$ c) L9 r# I1 o& K& w* J. U2 s

1 w+ M% h6 ?& Y6 P+ B1 C+ M+ ~兩者有何分別?
- ^# r8 Y  w; ~中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?