奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
$ a# ~8 a6 e. P8 o
( U7 y+ f9 y' o0 L' x5 h$ H) Yagree,6 Z# }( F  H/ `/ E# W/ `
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,/ Z) u3 D( b- O4 F+ A
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
, c( c. L. t7 n) H" T0 N; ?期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

0 m5 O+ C* i( d( L: w- w8 F
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html1 d" j9 `: M, a# U: Z3 s- o
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
7 f) _$ z* S+ L7 K, L搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
# d" e+ e( A' Z" \) v! cJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
3 n" `$ _# K0 g8 x有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 3 z; P0 E) K6 F& Q! M4 O

; S& Z2 v  b* S, [& q係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
/ `% E6 a  w2 [' @
) u4 U5 F) B  `& d# v8 O6 c2 s為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

' `2 ?; A9 f2 Z9 ]8 T
; }; B  z% }: A8 K" U' C絕對支持啦1 Y- J. C( _3 l1 C6 ~
+ v) y! E/ w4 P, S! |% n& B
有錯就認,打就企定
4 f; Y. u) s; y0 z% g
3 V) b) Z' f& A( h無錯當然要撐到底5 j& V6 K# X9 t6 o; s. j

" z! c% x8 k2 ~% D) i- T+ T" s但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩5 r; ^8 J3 U5 j; a2 v- T

) a" |; Z. F6 u9 o- ?在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
/ f6 D2 n4 {- G2 R. Q6 r0 O0 S# S* [0 H+ N; @+ S
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
8 w( ^& p& P2 d' W" m9 }1 H! Q/ B! T8 T+ C' S# ~+ p) x% R
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生/ L6 K- `1 h" y

, q" i* E' @& @, V唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?  V. G! Q4 t4 ~6 R; Z4 w6 }* Z
3 D( ]  @) {% I3 y  w8 v
我唔認為lor0 h9 g- f4 B# K( D; v# E$ M

5 J' ?  P8 e9 f- U. Z唔係話要整死佢地8 @5 Y( I( F% K% a. R6 S; t

6 ]" e9 w0 l6 U7 ]$ o而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用) {9 A( q3 j6 P% m9 a  `
( |6 n! E/ [7 ~& ?- w1 ?! y! N
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大  N: W6 J4 p3 a6 t
$ Q, x2 ~+ U; m
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的) m( x7 A+ c/ u# J( c
( _' b! K/ E/ K, i$ B
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
2 n8 j7 s- R, W& a
3 n( u1 l* r: }: u+ J5 z! g大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
, ~- e7 A+ r- b) Z"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
* v& x6 O  F! u/ Y0 Y, y8 T) `6 S* C) d3 r9 f. S4 A6 j
我們的大學生
, f& S) l' n5 \! n' a
: Z/ k) U7 Y$ t9 i, _1 G/ j
* e5 A9 ~. j$ b7 X. }% p
: |3 V- u8 a9 Q- K4 n( H/ I5 z3 o6 Y) b9 h. E* z0 A

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:" T/ S; A" a8 t( M3 }' [! g. F

. Z. m! b# s' y1 G6 {: {2 B$ |: T; U+ z2 V9 Z$ F
有見地 !!!* F9 W) r' ?( L' W" L4 y8 J3 S
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
+ Z, L: M0 a' A8 a& \1 i% @* I
. z  H' Y1 @( e2 c  K1 v1 d; NI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
4 X2 C+ X2 J0 J7 K2 }8 @I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. & d: R2 t' z$ m0 G8 R
I pretty sad that about the University official.
" k! o& l% h9 {( l7 |It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
* A4 l8 ?9 w9 \! b5 b# x1 r# T1 f( ~; H
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:0 ]: W( g9 i: k) W3 n' B: `
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la- o/ E, p8 {5 b8 U* V8 q

% ?' v7 ?) J0 T1 B4 i* A[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

# ^8 l* x# ^  M- c4 L* Z
. L- A' E; {, ?$ {; c兩者有何分別?
5 f* l+ U' l: W9 x中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?