奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
; n$ q& y+ ^! @' x. B7 v' G* w( n' T4 X* S
agree,
' g+ l' _' s6 A6 L我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
# V3 ?4 U7 J+ H( }: x1 s: b但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
# V" V" y/ E+ Q# ?期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

+ H' X* u/ v( w5 U! p5 C4 a; ?5 h
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html% ?3 X2 W; ?, \, Q4 G2 q; p# M. j" z
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地, d# P5 K) S8 T0 n2 Q9 ]8 {
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
% [: G$ l) L# U* [6 p* o/ mJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:" P5 P% M4 \2 e4 C' O- Q3 H4 T& C; j
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ . @- o% K3 L( \* {2 C$ X8 G0 B

& H$ B0 z; X' P% G+ ]7 Y" o係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
2 B% F1 b" o. b- B0 \8 b' `
/ t8 W7 b- t6 y3 s為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

! F" Q8 R" p8 @* j) q5 V2 s$ |! m8 t; M" j, Y: V
絕對支持啦& Z* V  C; |4 A  a* g% `1 }

- U/ ]/ F& M/ c有錯就認,打就企定) D) r# n( g1 Y; c' \
7 O3 E+ m1 g( P3 \1 |6 O3 F; E
無錯當然要撐到底
  v! @' @9 a: v! @) k
, ?5 O5 Q7 b4 c. _1 p% O" I但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩0 R6 c% ~) }4 H9 P- Z

( S$ u; C9 }( B5 q* c3 \在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得2 _* X7 f5 D8 V5 j" X! Q

# j* i7 G# u, g8 {+ }一份公眾讀物係好有影響力6 [2 [0 H) e( ?2 o

- O2 w. k& V5 k我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
& B. C! D4 I1 Q$ c+ P/ r# R( K: H4 f8 b
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
# v2 J4 g0 p, C9 r
; H, v2 X  s. x; h+ t6 Z7 v: p我唔認為lor! s) y  W3 }% f, U- G

1 M2 v; P& x+ |9 z7 t  i' Q唔係話要整死佢地
: _/ q) h! f6 h5 t
) d: A6 w' I& R; C4 d$ I/ J8 n$ y而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
* p& c# Z" k2 v0 w  v) Y: S
5 M* p% Y( h/ [9 K" ^; o我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大" v  e2 n& G/ k& b. h1 n; n7 R5 \

* r, S: Y" _* U- }- h$ C* W有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
7 _$ q6 z9 H) P8 B
! g0 E) k/ A% ^7 Y唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由9 r% v* ~" a8 V+ f1 m
' R0 k, e* _3 m8 K2 M( M
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句3 K8 K) v' D3 k% P7 J0 T
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
: J& c* d5 Y0 K5 O3 u6 I( |3 j: x* ^- C+ Z8 \) _0 i
我們的大學生, _& F6 a# U4 s; R
/ z- }) D0 R& {  m3 F
6 H' `( F2 x9 \, X- a+ ~
( T7 z5 f7 ?. k& m0 a) u7 {- I

+ G) d2 W1 f; \; H6 a1 b0 L9 g

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:( T) N1 O  R) A, X
  O; A% d$ ?& ~* ?

" `: r7 G% l0 C: n* Y有見地 !!!6 Y; [8 ]7 l$ W% w" Q7 y
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html1 {0 m) {! k7 s% `/ y! w* ~% e" F
" n; S1 u; N" U$ ^/ l2 G
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 8 ?' |* D, {4 Z" ?5 l- ~( }; L
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 5 N% I5 {' r0 m8 z, `/ ~' z
I pretty sad that about the University official.
, s  A( e& m2 H$ {- r, lIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la. \3 t/ F, E# Y5 p; y8 U

# v$ g0 _) `5 Q  ~2 Z4 K[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
( c9 o4 e2 m4 U我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la$ Z. c( u# M8 E/ b5 C
) H9 l3 e6 m  t+ t! `' M/ K& B
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

' i0 v; U3 U# c

' J0 o+ @7 f( x+ |6 i. g兩者有何分別?2 S2 \7 Q1 F: N
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?