奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
0 Y2 Z8 G/ m/ J& A3 x. n; y6 o# a& l. {2 M/ q0 J% O
agree,- w& z' F$ \+ |% w: s
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
+ M) r( M, P+ d4 t6 {但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,: o$ X5 k1 e/ x
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

& f) e8 g# v% r" Mhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html0 P* T0 ^, R2 H, l
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
* r. m$ @" x: T4 X9 a  n) b搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media." H9 H: j7 s; b/ `* X3 q
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
' U! J& T" q% I  w. ]  K6 G+ L有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ + Z/ T3 ?, f" ^
  x. K4 {  f* X/ ~, Y8 F( Y
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
9 ^5 `2 [9 i4 D1 e; [, k- U0 ~7 Q3 p6 p0 S) N: y/ k
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

& p" z* O' G: E2 C9 y; `% G
4 R& g* Z5 E$ [4 o1 @絕對支持啦
& ?- `# S2 d1 W. m
+ `% ^7 S5 {9 d; r有錯就認,打就企定
; E- h) t" t4 k
1 D/ {3 W- e! }1 ?  @3 q& W無錯當然要撐到底7 j# R0 Y- O( I' C4 {

6 |, Z7 a: W1 p. s; z9 B6 i$ H但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
% T% s3 j, d( z% }" P
  G; U. k/ b/ g. p5 W在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得  f+ D' g1 u" F/ U2 d5 H: m
) C- p% D% z6 O- i; _
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
; N1 f! Z+ e3 E) K/ P! i
4 y: Y) ?$ ~9 m我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
: F8 h" I% E4 Z) B. m, x- n- t- |( W/ V7 l* J$ d6 n. e
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
/ t) O" w. M, L  X3 r+ p- S, _: @! d) Q
我唔認為lor
, Q$ q+ v( b, l. Z3 `6 B; P
! P0 a2 e2 ?8 G! x唔係話要整死佢地
& U) b# }+ a( m
" v4 B- V3 u. `9 @而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
- A5 h6 w: K! C3 `
5 Z; _2 F# K. @/ U  U我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大+ S7 `1 M* E1 m) M6 G

( B# |, N# M: e4 G, B: P有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
, q& c$ A- ^: X! R$ ]% o1 S2 @1 l. ]' P6 b1 i/ x9 N
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
# ], H1 \+ X' u9 c
* Y1 I+ @7 B8 P7 t) C) k) d& |! h' _大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句0 m/ Z' \7 S" \  G$ ~9 h
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
. U. o# {8 o, m( s; ]( ^# ^5 R1 Y# E% C' u& o8 w& R" w: U% z8 q
我們的大學生
. }9 r4 X  J& G6 h& q4 @! G: D6 z  I9 w) v; N) M4 L
2 A- h. x/ x( X" W8 j1 N* u: O% l
  s, T% |7 B  B! X

! s# e9 x7 M" O6 V1 _

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:5 i* M* E0 f! U. r: o7 T9 }
! m3 |& o4 Q" U8 O+ N: o
* H1 W% c! l* ^' z  ^
有見地 !!!3 [- L, F# T9 J' D) i4 |
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html8 `2 M# i; Q( F
8 h4 C5 A7 B2 d8 {- f
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. . }  f+ [0 ?' g) g) s8 y# U  v+ h
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
% \) ^2 Y: o/ e2 FI pretty sad that about the University official.
0 W+ D' k6 f+ U% N* @: g2 ^It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
0 v! n( D! ?: n& T& S+ h6 F5 q6 G. x# s2 R6 K
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
; I3 f, G$ Z2 L. `8 N& }# b* s我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
8 [" ?, k( [: |! Y; K5 s
+ [+ E8 j+ {/ P4 P5 d) O[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

' x, Q7 _1 c% s! C- k- O5 w8 r
" {" T: ^7 Q/ @4 x$ |' C
兩者有何分別?
. m# v8 i. ?, ~) N  w中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?