奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
( O  C  p9 T3 K, C/ I  z" T. M+ \+ F0 |) A$ {( z
agree,
/ y2 c3 d' Y% g1 b. Q我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,: B/ F% G/ `3 U  j! W/ j6 d2 Y( }
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,/ Y2 X6 l2 P1 I2 t& `
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

$ n0 m  O2 E' J; v7 x" E( }http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
8 v# i3 z3 }# _, s# U9 D已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地4 u1 W5 |4 z, u. S
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
9 o* r9 p" ?( I4 `! T0 `5 g  x6 VJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
  x% G. C+ D& I/ B5 M- j; n# d# b有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
# z, [0 z5 |! [1 i7 F4 K3 z8 R0 U- @/ k, X$ _8 U# X# Y7 _
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???; m: {' N9 g7 |8 \7 G3 `' C. e
+ B+ }% ^. p% |/ J4 ~
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

' S- T5 p9 I5 @6 }/ r& M; l
  ^5 Y8 O% K5 E- ]# j6 F8 f絕對支持啦. s9 i6 F1 E+ Y) B
4 }) D" t8 Z3 c, Q
有錯就認,打就企定, T  V! w3 R; K
1 `4 _& _% D' N. ]% d( W
無錯當然要撐到底7 L+ N, @, C: [( F

$ u9 ~- g' F" P9 R. @! T! V- M但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩. A7 e: q4 z- I/ m7 \+ b9 |

/ E- \; ~# `2 U( Y; k7 {4 v在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得( K, m5 [7 A9 E

/ B7 j4 q: Z, s# j  J7 s一份公眾讀物係好有影響力3 k" t- H/ ^7 v
& I, _1 K: E; Y7 `4 W) A
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生+ x% _$ c+ B5 `- R. o8 V

+ \# u7 u% u6 Z2 q) v8 k) f唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?1 G8 e' b' `# W' K7 D6 A" s

) [. Q( e- V5 d4 D+ @+ k3 P我唔認為lor
9 q( \2 l$ V; A. ~7 E1 X
& ~: o  ?, P- j+ x; o  c2 V唔係話要整死佢地1 U: h. C* z& @6 ~9 Y

' L) f$ u# J, W) `6 ]/ g而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用/ ?* M2 K, p4 z% s& \  s

' l0 l, W- C+ Y- c/ b$ j我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大7 K& y3 H6 T$ S9 e  l

/ S* K  D5 E1 l6 ]有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的( _- `4 [- `# G0 \& k* @! [; i

, I/ t+ ?+ D+ ^1 X8 H% ~/ \唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由/ h# ~9 g0 m( a+ Y7 U( u
5 l% \% r. p1 P4 }  d
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
6 z7 j1 Y* L. p! b* Y, d"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非") p8 v/ o9 \" e' V) B/ a3 c
5 n/ D8 Z; w0 |! X2 D) I5 Q
我們的大學生2 R8 l# \% Y: O4 `3 D

2 X- b1 l* ?2 V3 _
, \3 L. \  Y9 N$ S$ `9 {- H2 o8 r
% q3 f- m; H- r$ J2 m' ^0 [+ R
( o; f% M! G7 z( A! C

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:5 [' V+ H4 \) I" P; l* H! s! [* a
! `) C  s1 B) s! e- c# T
) c. i+ _9 C7 u) r
有見地 !!!2 X" @) [- U0 e" Z4 N9 M$ T5 b6 l3 h
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html9 g3 S& z* z3 @% S3 ~
! X8 q8 K+ d* k' G2 ]
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 5 ]- W5 s7 F) q: c$ T/ X5 A5 Z
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
+ A6 d* d9 _, O, F( QI pretty sad that about the University official.
/ I( ^" P5 l) k  s0 XIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la0 k; h9 Z4 K2 j+ h

# h0 ^; c+ C1 |4 N[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
4 S7 J6 ^* D/ I: ^3 R8 g我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
7 S0 @$ p" l0 ~8 ~: c$ f$ W3 j* i' E- Z" ~1 T4 |4 x- u: _; i
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

. V2 W- z; G! g( t( o: `
5 J, {! d, t5 N- |9 Y兩者有何分別?; \1 U  ]( B; u/ A
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?