<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
- ]* l1 t% c$ N! @8 G. `但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
: o. f4 V% d0 U" o0 J大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
! a# X" y" w' |6 T6 s! GI agree you points that it could be illegal
' h& p8 M3 g* x; w8 bbut that is still a "gray area"
6 A5 w2 ~  f% v  Z/ P7 q; q+ Uwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
+ g3 Q+ E0 k, _1 a7 i% L& k* m6 L& h. o7 H$ U) T/ n
anyway, I want to say that is" z" }6 l; N' T/ H: Y  M+ B
who is supposed to be protected by laws0 @% O  Z! w% O: p" I
creators?+ S3 E  Q% I7 w' s
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market6 A9 Q0 C9 M3 Q/ R
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.; T& y; T+ s& H6 l( C9 Q! l
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those( @( K4 }. T6 D4 H* v/ m5 e$ {+ n7 D
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:# J3 J( z& _; Z# `7 q& N
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
& v+ D$ g7 P; Z; b+ m' d我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:: k* T$ Q+ h: b0 D  n( h: _
! f* z$ l0 d8 D3 a! P0 T6 x
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
- r+ T& J% m# `6 z+ a; M" }, I( C) O) W: R
唔係喎!
3 T4 u# C/ b( \& }* o古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!" h  G3 k" e) O$ k7 [7 p9 `
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!# w$ Q  w) d3 y# t2 b% `* T
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!1 s, ~% r0 j, k* M
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
3 B. r$ ]  M+ x1 N2 a3 _一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!% ]+ t5 j) z9 p+ ?0 G7 G
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......# d8 x( x" [7 e( E
if so bad, dun download la, right?
$ D3 A( S9 E  C, O* t% x' }i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
2 q6 Y$ p8 j' P# dbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct! R" t8 f$ t: R8 N3 W+ f5 H
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la1 {- Y. O, v. W
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
  d1 ], w' w( q& S" `2 ?! dusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........$ s1 S; r- b0 D" R9 y
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!4 f- }' L' v0 y* i. ^5 X
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!* ?1 E  Z4 D% Q1 f0 E
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~5 B! s" ~& K  R$ J: k$ v9 \
政府想比下馬威0的人~~3 w- Z0 {3 l- P
錢就一定罰% q. B- G7 Y1 R; w' r; d4 C9 ^
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
' N; i! i5 N- W8 T( F唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
! z. T3 @: c) t* [9 K佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
% V9 Z! X2 b( k; C到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。