奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
/ Y3 Z0 k  b0 Z1 b1 x  E# k( b3 I" y' Z: H
/ J4 f2 ^& m/ v$ c) D8 Kagree,
6 {4 P5 _6 |4 a& {, z我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
0 a. {, G. u4 E& u& a但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
7 G% R: ]. R( t' b# K期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

: S5 d: s/ {  I. k6 s7 Y4 Thttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
5 B( O' j- z) V# Q+ G$ j1 x已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地: s4 q" r9 _( ]; Y
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.2 e- S3 H% }# f) f. W+ U# E
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
7 _, y3 D9 n. t3 g' \4 K# A有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 0 Y# L- c1 L- g  S+ r1 H

% r: \0 f1 \. u+ q- C; v0 X係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???8 X: |; y5 h" ~) E1 ]0 H1 R
. A, h) y; e' J9 e
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

* Y" @: m6 x6 f, ?0 z0 I4 u4 E& r7 `- u5 }1 `' C* U
絕對支持啦/ @) H6 J/ V8 V2 }: ?: Z; a3 B
! |) b; O& s# K
有錯就認,打就企定
2 k5 r$ k7 \3 z  v% ?- z% A
9 z) O( Z8 ]4 y4 B) f) o無錯當然要撐到底
/ }' W2 l9 z5 w3 O! d
8 Z$ N3 j+ Y  s' o: |2 ^但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
: K' `* ?3 s* f. W. \/ z# h: K+ W, j, m( ?! j7 U. g2 a
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
9 X! |0 l7 t- z) _' i6 p, t
+ L8 F6 m! w9 {. Q8 K一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
1 j8 w! N! Q7 O- E0 F
% ^6 W7 t6 v3 E7 B# r0 ^: V% F我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
8 y% v7 q# ?0 _& s% K0 @
! l7 B4 ]6 I7 r* ?" i% k( O: a唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?9 u; T3 B) g  v# U9 ]& s8 E( Z7 ^

1 R' H, F6 a, t8 f4 d" v我唔認為lor/ G+ @$ Q. u1 Z" G2 J
, U3 D) u4 u1 H( F( E5 R  T3 F
唔係話要整死佢地
1 f/ X$ T9 C9 g  I) f7 a
: g5 @  b6 S6 K7 l! Z. C, D而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
7 d$ l  D9 r% J9 b# m8 @. Q  u, |( P2 n' N1 q! `
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
! \  H7 R  Q4 E
8 N2 l! @8 k4 E( G7 q8 c有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的# a$ Q. W$ {+ {6 |+ U9 _' q8 {8 a
5 i6 K0 i4 {+ p
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由$ q" D0 L3 F% L# e8 T! }. }0 }2 s0 |

( U: {5 ^6 G( K/ C/ l0 }3 x大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句2 h7 O, B7 ]) n$ E; k
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"8 R+ d  b: h+ H7 |

- x( E8 d9 N  o- ~* L我們的大學生5 A9 W" |( |; a/ y/ a% I$ f7 U

$ U$ b; [2 ]7 |+ e* Y8 V
8 {- I+ Q5 w$ w( j$ y3 w$ g# R1 R
' M: E6 |) t1 C0 {8 q. @3 s; T; U% L4 \8 d3 `

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:) E: C& X/ {) u( \; \

6 g5 Z; l! Y* g5 z& {6 C" S* }+ y9 U/ h. Q3 u1 C, k* T4 {
有見地 !!!' D* S. T: m# S. R8 X$ d; [
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
/ a7 w( ~3 Q; c( ?. j
3 O+ Q7 q% k3 X) ~* \5 FI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. $ T, ?5 M6 P9 `& p7 K# k  ^' g9 |, Q& Z
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 7 Z7 w5 t$ B; }. r! {" @/ H$ G
I pretty sad that about the University official.# R- F4 O# I2 [" \, B$ p
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
9 j' r+ O8 S# O4 e0 X5 m  }. `4 d- ]7 E7 [7 p1 ^
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:( S" u0 C9 D4 @% h$ S" C0 Y
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
2 E& Q' ~/ ~' C: q4 Y
! E6 Q3 i2 O2 A. R( c[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

6 \+ ^, S5 a$ g* P! F: M/ Q

  D0 D1 x& u6 C, ?# g6 e兩者有何分別?; Q! ~* w# M# |- T+ V7 V
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?