奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:& }" x4 t  e6 C/ h, a# c$ Z
  V  {/ f, a! S. F3 k; P+ y4 T
agree,
5 K7 n) u8 M, h2 w# `, j  j" _我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
( _$ h% S) d7 i& |# q但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
  J% l$ Q# K7 a. X期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

: O  T4 ?% d& U' d% I+ d, k5 g
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
. }( M! J5 t! B! Z( A* }( A+ d, r已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
1 x; b9 F: K$ n搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
, D/ j/ K% ]+ ?+ M: kJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
4 ~+ f; c1 q6 a3 ~有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ + w9 Q# ?: x1 ~" y/ d" |6 q
  Z* M1 Z$ T8 L  r/ z
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
6 S  B" ^, z# ]: L' K$ F% U* V5 E5 P$ q8 x2 y, G2 U
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

- a8 P4 M" E) f

7 F8 F1 P- b' h  b絕對支持啦# S' c# j7 E8 {1 s% v# z
; f, m$ A, r# W2 M* ?& u
有錯就認,打就企定
& C( e  S! ]& ^; Y5 c& E/ e0 V! \8 X
無錯當然要撐到底* \! a, p8 N! c7 c- m# U

' |) f' Q$ t9 D$ ]) o$ c+ G$ p但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
' u, S0 j" D  T2 ]! S4 d7 _7 D) V% n4 u& X8 T
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
/ c, U. @' _8 S. w2 A
3 H! @4 z/ C  i! E% R" Q% _一份公眾讀物係好有影響力6 L; [1 U$ D+ @, p. W/ v

& `2 O, k" v. U' N4 B我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生  p. ~$ `- @( b  |3 |7 A
$ |: c7 Z2 x. s  \7 x
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
$ c2 ~7 Q' ~7 I3 H" b/ x4 z* W' j* ?# P0 c' x) ?
我唔認為lor
; _9 M) f" A$ g% K
7 D, J% @3 M, B$ B唔係話要整死佢地# \; X* |3 O1 Y  A! {/ t  z

4 t" V6 W* z( H2 ^: D而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用/ e5 q# k& V2 D% z) t

" t& G( Q1 ?  ^+ }: f7 C/ K3 C我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大* F& `$ L% f1 k) N' a6 |  B  f& E* L
4 [* a3 X  z+ E7 I
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的, r# A: D# N) p" S9 m1 k
, ]+ h# S; @+ {  k
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
: x- v9 H) j4 K0 P& l! U4 X6 w4 K. ]8 K( V& g0 E& X* T1 _- X  z8 R
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
/ E! `7 p. O3 r"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"4 q' x: Y* i8 D- A
3 T. j5 ]6 W" G# Z
我們的大學生& M$ ~5 O; _9 ~/ P
/ ?7 q1 D$ F( s
( l' U& V5 `8 E- b

- o9 Y& N  _( }* y, n
6 A/ U" k/ x3 T; i

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:2 I: D/ r2 \9 V

# u1 e( @. A* t
- R% v( y; R8 B8 r- F% ^8 o有見地 !!!
' y# k' M1 {0 @/ g現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
" G) G$ }  ?1 @  ]& Y% O
: o( L- C+ `6 L# }- b, {3 AI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 8 ]7 g4 g$ i9 a: L
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
2 Y# L% o" i2 E1 ^/ u; GI pretty sad that about the University official.
( X; L5 X4 \' ]4 ?# A7 e9 c4 vIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la0 r; @2 L: b0 b4 l6 P

" J1 k0 o/ P! Z0 @: M5 A4 \! B[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
& L4 m: m" M& V8 ^& V- F' \我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la- l  c: y2 V7 Q& }3 v5 W1 M' x
! g4 ?1 @3 s; a
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

" k3 S& o( ?, c1 D, @1 a/ F; \6 @  U+ ]* e, O
兩者有何分別?1 _$ F; l) E* Q" y  \! |
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?