 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
: ]7 z' E* G4 L6 n- z5 M& c' S3 n; Q3 }+ G$ v" m; Z
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
2 h5 ?# R9 e. L! r6 j
1 |$ Y' t4 T8 W0 IIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
0 d C* B) `5 Z, jand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
- B9 |2 P; g7 R9 ?! l) h# \
2 c; \+ G" v; R6 {: ~so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
+ \ c1 y4 f% a5 a7 ~4 y; t% t( @+ T( ~; \" I: L# G- a5 ~
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, " H( W3 K a& Z+ A
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|