Rika

由最好排到最壞, K4 r. P  [6 ?1 V
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
) ]$ V) Q7 S2 Y& i  `( {B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount& e; a9 Z$ p' _7 h
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her3 `7 M6 f- x0 G  [7 K
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
7 _. Y8 q4 R* ?$ ~% S0 fL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:/ _6 ^- F- r# q/ g! s: U
' A, b3 c2 D4 X4 o
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
' z3 i( }. t) Z
4 n; D( W* V5 rS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)6 y8 t! y  a7 ~( o
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
" l, S; K8 @3 ]+ d6 F
" P' y8 l7 p! S2 [" ZB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做" V/ s0 }) ]: S2 ^' A8 j1 w3 g: u
* H- m5 P9 y; ^9 }( w( u
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志; K. I9 J! c/ _5 O! ?2 p- Z
% p4 O; t1 o1 Q6 p% X9 [# V% l
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,/ ?0 }; v+ @$ {, w# R2 h
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
$ [; q1 e7 k$ n  A
& q" S' J' E5 d6 S5 \[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
9 O7 z0 I9 _- I. U; F9 J而家答多次
# D2 P; T! ], `9 @. Z$ wf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
) A0 L9 e% P: cl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架: y. b9 f$ w3 f& i! W$ r: s, F0 y
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
0 J* Y/ v5 G4 r( x, z; {s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.5 D' @* [3 r# U# W0 B2 N/ f$ ^
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S* e2 ]; n+ \2 E6 ?+ R, `! H

& a" W( x( T) e5 G" nL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
, \- ]4 w( o; n' n: U- n! a1 i7 D) yF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
( @: e; {5 C. e  {3 h' e: ~: o& }M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒2 q! \/ X3 N4 D* C8 F
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
: c3 P( T' Q1 u% ?6 R9 c* bB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
( s9 e" m0 T2 \) c1 Z: O* g% S0 u  VF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"% x+ }# a9 r; h
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
( w+ C$ U6 O2 M6 @M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法8 F0 b8 O- {$ @4 m9 o
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
0 L7 S5 D& l5 G5 T8 nB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
: f9 }# c5 S* Y8 m% Z0 e6 @4 _
; O/ L+ y) b; Z世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
' R: p' b/ Q4 F  v9 zL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己1 h8 }9 Z1 _- [3 d3 ^6 h6 |) k) d  `
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘" S1 t1 I5 y8 j& p1 @( Q7 V
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
  r% {: {8 f' TF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
2 O! P4 a8 {( T0 z; p' U2 I5 \9 k# VM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

1 u2 B$ {1 o' H/ C7 {4 g; y

7 Z- {) D0 G4 J6 A! ]* S; d  x; W! X same choices with u , but want to add some comments - N: ~7 Q& p8 y0 L' o
2 S# d: n; Y5 c4 L9 R6 ~% k
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
3 k, F+ g( N8 [, n( |5 C/ E9 R, M% X- D% x$ r8 u( m* e3 B0 q" w* t# O; _
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
+ N( R9 L3 A. h. [7 P2 E9 E- F  S' M8 V5 S5 U# v+ B6 Z
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
- R% J! K  f1 `* k; n
( {9 T! s- _; R: e( `# _M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......! |3 ~. N: I3 w5 @7 \$ g+ ^

! q* v( i4 c+ B' F& ~! p[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge' U8 k1 a$ M( F
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
4 j. R, p% N8 O- t7 w- O# `+ EL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
9 t, k8 [2 w. q: |F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma' v( \  N' S7 q; ?/ }9 ]. _
5 Z& M0 A4 W9 J8 ]+ x5 V5 N
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....* l' t" Y5 v/ d* Y
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
4 U& `$ o7 c9 R由最好開始排起既話，
- X6 L8 J$ C5 k  b2 |L B M F S 啦，9 N% X) s9 X) D
  f; K, L( l) t- j
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
! f* h! q( x4 c' n6 z  O9 y, i但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？5 G; h! K0 T5 b# Y  h
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
# k3 O  |8 l" G又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
3 @) f' K: K8 {' E2 W& \! ]% j' E( Z8 N/ u
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
# j! i3 V* a$ H1 L所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，" {7 T( R- R4 B5 B( p
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
! u/ G$ U% b( @) X! b1 C# a& r! Z/ G
4 X, l8 b0 ^# b8 W而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，+ c0 M- j6 R; N3 b, A' {
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
% v; k6 P9 U! d3 j亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
! E# D+ T/ k) }' |知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
! \. d2 H* m0 a M 都可算壞了。' \" G- Q% j2 N: E% D

) J1 _, s6 S& U# |1 ~1 c  x5 \ F 呢個人仲掂，
, f3 u- B2 S5 H. K8 {7 F知道既唔等於要講，
' Y* q1 ~3 z3 |5 p如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
: [' ]& w. d6 n' o' v我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
+ Q% r8 q& i# F& u- V
) Y% }' |) `: |  q  ^最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
: d  X+ s- j. k7 V5 c  N始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。4 ^+ C* l/ U& [6 ~; |' b

( E1 G! L! c6 {( }& l5 t
! @1 s0 Y# Z% W- a/ l1 ~
" z% X4 U- R8 X5 r題外話：
& O4 ~" |5 N7 R7 S8 ]唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，1 g! v1 {+ |; P0 U7 m2 `  m
睇到 S 呢條友，: x, S; C( T* k2 o* r) m
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L1 b5 b; ^9 Q8 p7 g8 p: q$ X

6 S2 o4 B! ^; k0 j* }4 Z( L3 lS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!4 v3 C- E/ S+ G2 Q
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係% o' D$ R+ e: i+ F' o2 H
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她6 }# n4 y8 ~3 x" U0 P( S2 F
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
0 v" u) B- O. \* l- c: H% {L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...