Rika

由最好排到最壞/ g: d1 J0 |9 C1 n: q
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
/ O9 V2 _1 L) T' r* ]) T$ h/ a0 BB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
5 \1 B8 r; h0 O# x# x0 NS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
- y5 N$ U$ D1 J/ s2 LM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure5 J5 ~: O* K: r8 `, G) G
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:7 G2 E$ A; N0 T8 n5 N) e# \; Q# ^
0 d" s; k1 Q6 X* |* n: b1 E# d4 f' t
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
( R4 b' T2 D! h) z% u. r0 ]( P3 b+ I1 q  w% S* |0 ]
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)' b( z% J5 |4 u# C! z. ^+ a: n
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
1 ~" x! f, N& ~
7 J. k+ o1 g! x  H2 ?- ]B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做7 Q$ P$ E. Z$ G( R
  V# n% {6 u8 U: O+ l/ r
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志. p( P8 D2 E6 O1 _: [
: J3 m: [  Y) h) V! x! {" S
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,, g7 n3 x+ T. W% i# f$ g$ O; J# N
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好1 k7 e" W2 P: X$ ]
: f# T% o5 X0 m4 u7 T2 ^/ F% a# t1 f
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
7 \& O# p, U* c( S. i  @1 v而家答多次- A/ f9 n5 g& G9 l# Z" d1 z" o) r8 |9 H
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽  U5 o- w+ @- A. s; u
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
4 y+ v; _' v! n8 ]4 a9 Fb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
: y$ b9 O7 E1 R* r- ns: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
/ a" ]& o: o2 N  k* w& @m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
% R* z9 L( `9 L" L8 C( _
7 Y; e& R/ X$ k% W5 J9 K4 hL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大& M- o/ T0 M; ?; N- g
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度7 w' Q0 q5 R* W, J+ Y
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒- U( ?  G3 V6 K2 P% ?; c( V
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
! B; h( K) H5 w) Y6 ?' E, s, \* wB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞' U- }+ _6 e* f4 b& Y+ k
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"& F# \0 ]6 R! U1 ~  m
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取& Q0 J( b; C! F: C" s" T+ m
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法4 E0 w0 c" p( \$ w4 d6 o
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
- [3 J: R- C3 w* n$ I2 ]. D* z2 WB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
, c2 w4 H5 l) v) `  \+ t3 R/ E' |4 @1 T' i* ]' l' _. l
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:7 v2 E  ^& E' _2 G6 X
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
5 G0 b: j$ L6 l: X& ?) kB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘6 J: w% w) F+ U! q
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件+ D+ f/ _5 l2 c* k/ f
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方, b4 H6 F) w8 L* q! `0 R" ?
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

  I; e* q+ o2 J- ], |
( L; Z9 j" b7 c& z! I( e' H same choices with u , but want to add some comments # J, Y! N  {! z5 m5 R9 P5 |

, {1 p* S' ^) ]3 bB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  - `) |+ t7 j/ H% k0 w2 c( }6 z& s

9 U) A2 H5 S) a* ^  q0 gS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )& a! A: Y+ S; E- A: p+ L
/ Y( H. f  _$ |: @( K- u2 h
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome " _3 N- A* X& M0 Q0 N1 o; T
8 `& r0 Q% A. q3 j, x7 L8 v
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
+ P3 G  g& n4 [0 N3 L
$ J. a% K$ ^8 `[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge' e8 D; d% d) l) {5 c8 ]
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
( [5 E7 z$ h" J+ VL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點! f  \) N5 q8 m: G( c
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma* u+ X7 D# v9 W  [' I+ V  |, r6 M

" I6 F4 \$ _: w, O: H4 b4 _最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
+ x! r) w# n6 U1 ]! D有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，! B' Y) o2 X9 o5 Y2 P
由最好開始排起既話，0 E7 E% a0 ?3 |; w& y
L B M F S 啦，
" x- C2 L/ Z+ `" f4 U
: o2 p3 k: q6 [' q: G& c' a8 x" f0 D其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
. Y) {/ W) c/ Q# m5 S4 p8 s但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？, i/ ^! q/ n. d( H) R" R
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？2 `/ \2 J8 S5 r& N( C0 U
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。8 D, V$ r  ^- f( L
4 o( W* F/ e/ J4 {! L1 d+ h+ T) V
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，7 V1 j6 m4 c3 Q$ n9 n7 z) U
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，& J. r$ ^2 ^/ k0 f: _& W+ C
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
, l5 v7 G  o: Z8 C  ~* t6 z3 ?1 i5 W5 g1 x
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
, @5 Y$ a2 D: F8 U; z M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，5 X0 t1 N8 w: Q5 h$ O4 I  Q- }
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，$ X$ j5 o6 s% f; ^5 v2 m8 @
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，2 R) W$ u! [- f! a" p2 A. e
M 都可算壞了。$ P1 C5 J3 Z! s9 `$ h2 p# a2 v
' ^+ E4 v4 x, A9 ]$ P
F 呢個人仲掂，, \/ f3 M- j4 z2 m* h+ g
知道既唔等於要講，+ _% q6 Q6 }& y; Z# I% A
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，$ \& `$ b6 m4 o
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
! ?# {! w0 ~2 |; m% u- j, S: i, l) t& k/ F
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，2 f5 B. C- E  _
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
- i* Z. U1 L7 M" e
/ E& A8 h$ O  I" m/ W4 l2 Q" @2 h2 B6 W/ v: f

1 {6 n8 W& `5 k題外話：( l0 L/ k( D4 k
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
0 W' l0 S% R0 w; j, S0 {睇到 S 呢條友，+ F  y" ~0 b7 R
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L+ [4 {8 V' ^9 W% t1 M  N. s
; i3 W; x' l: m) x, S0 ]
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
& t, L2 X0 p4 G* S+ `5 VF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係) L, ?! @/ ^, c/ z' C: m$ x) j
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她* `& [% h  O# N" B, c
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
  e: r. N% `% W  vL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...