Rika

由最好排到最壞
6 {  i/ u+ t3 Y& X. D  I! T: ]F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
! J& ]0 `: Z0 F; _5 M- \7 H6 x3 KB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
6 M9 X! `! [; r0 m8 H! o# \# e# QS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
- J& y, [8 ]+ M& O4 T5 RM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure( l0 o$ W3 I2 [- d
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:& q2 E" w8 c5 u; n1 U
% F; [, e1 X/ x6 r9 m3 G7 y
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人+ |9 P$ ?0 Y: x* b9 a' t7 O- q4 b

* z% F! y  R& m* r1 \# z) u- z8 M: xS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
0 a# ]' w: }9 V7 ?6 N% f8 O     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!  J# U5 `% b, W' A0 F  }; \
) ]( w6 H  c7 l5 f
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
2 Y7 f* D; u, n" ]( n$ t8 ?- A( x' _+ |$ U, `. H. b% Y/ Z
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志. [, ^3 e& O9 d% h  T) t

; Q% f8 S2 t6 {0 W3 ]F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
# R9 j& E# I6 ~# [     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好- D( ?# b& F) h8 `
7 f% G& T6 e8 l
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案3 ~: z6 e: e* ]& I3 r" e- W
而家答多次3 c* a  l, R# p+ U5 n
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
' F, W9 b+ \  T0 X2 T* `3 O) Ml: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
- ~' Z8 @1 v; d' P: t" Q0 V) Tb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢  g. X. r. u) R2 t8 p
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.& R# Y% D6 }& ]7 t" f" A
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S3 k# y, g, @+ H

5 j, z" C0 @  H1 G' X# WL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
( F2 a& v. _. J3 l2 F) N7 A$ qF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
- V* u* m9 s. `( W( C: y$ uM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
& V) O6 S: ]# F; ?2 O$ h6 q% BS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
- F; j2 L* D9 C- @. L9 s5 FB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞  b& X. v7 D) R' y
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"- w/ y; V; h1 p0 e9 e4 T
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
6 U+ J- n3 A/ [) _5 h7 ^2 ZM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法, J2 U! \2 n5 _
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果5 m4 w4 R. M3 c# X
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情1 B' x, g. c1 _, b. ^* A
9 s# t; s- e3 J8 f
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:6 f" g) q; d' p" n% h
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己1 c! P! |- a# U6 o- G
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘6 j2 f" e2 W# X* J
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件; Y1 u0 w- N  X; B! Q# X& d
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方2 A# W: a$ s, a) E/ F6 ^
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

2 e# N: w* I% H8 J6 o; G# x: w! l2 m% k
same choices with u , but want to add some comments ; w+ j! Z: R6 Y. y

% s# l) a9 S, IB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
8 U, h3 t' {+ C
# e0 U4 L/ R) {8 A( U& U2 X' [2 }S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
" `! E* o/ y2 @/ R2 F6 \7 O  p
* t! i4 E) b- ]. G' CF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
+ }0 l0 ^7 ~- \. c2 }4 Z# T! N
( f  u1 j7 F* x& s6 nM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......$ G: O1 ]& |! K4 R  y. Y- i; a

# V" h7 F& K% t7 I2 I[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
+ @0 D2 u% p% a3 v- FM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
2 b0 D$ h0 M. ~5 p, ?L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點# L+ k8 v4 V' W, @' Z5 h
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
( R% [" ?6 d5 r/ `5 X$ P# v2 W3 \' B7 D. D# I1 E
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
& u/ Z3 H! l) v3 w( g! j5 q7 k有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，3 o7 e1 c, q1 q7 z$ R- K4 I
由最好開始排起既話，
* `, S5 K5 x* f7 c4 R  mL B M F S 啦，- [' o# S1 V) o4 G$ ^0 D- a* \

3 F  y1 p3 X: s* X3 a4 j5 _其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，, p( w1 {* h% S$ q/ g* r
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？! W: p! }/ Z" t2 ?; ]
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？3 ]- ]8 v) j* U* L) R7 n5 {: {
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
( t1 r% Q) g6 h5 M% ?8 V# U+ M: v
: m3 `+ p) d+ N8 f" ^而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
$ l9 ~  f  h8 {5 t1 y所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，9 y$ b& R  G( B2 p3 ~9 V: W
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
  T# s, U9 x: f
4 |' p# [: r# D8 p: I: L( v而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，3 q& X7 m2 `; f- K& @# y1 i
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，# [# R! [5 ~+ }7 s6 J8 p! O
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，) E5 Y2 O  x: Z2 C- M1 x
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
  |1 V" {' }1 r" D  S8 w( M, y/ K M 都可算壞了。9 R( z$ D' c' r" b, c7 y9 \
! R- N8 b: q  d/ b3 X
F 呢個人仲掂，
- J5 T5 |0 ?  h4 {* K, w: R& \知道既唔等於要講，9 Y4 g* n- G4 z+ a4 O% B
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，' O# A' b% C, r6 l. |
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。) Z$ Y, a% c! l, g# Z& ^
+ x. Y" N* S, @8 Y
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，& g' d) `# V8 K7 _! |
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。/ z8 w) N- q6 Q" F9 i& ?0 o

% R# ?; y: p8 r) x4 J6 G2 R1 T+ l: F1 L
2 n. f' j9 c0 t- L* T3 ~3 X2 _9 }7 ^% V- [
題外話：4 y: V9 R4 B5 O* Q
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
; y6 c: S2 ^, V+ k睇到 S 呢條友，
$ _4 h/ X+ h; f7 ^我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
: [0 r% w; t0 w7 |0 }& j& @! r# t4 k* A
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
) s- y2 ~7 a" LF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係  q0 q. d5 V$ T+ k3 z$ g
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她- O7 Y' d  I3 `+ q
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害8 P. Q% s9 Y( v$ K1 q
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...