Rika

由最好排到最壞# i0 y; |  l6 S' A/ G( j4 k9 B
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
9 d9 ]3 W- ^/ @# _8 CB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
( M- ~0 S6 u& x( x3 ?S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her* W# {# l+ K  {3 ~1 \9 A' l. o
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
. S% e/ J: Z5 d& S4 cL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:/ p/ r; z8 P1 D$ {
% w& E. z! d4 C$ i" f8 @6 z* ?8 _
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人2 z" D. B+ N2 A) s7 s! \

- w3 K1 G/ D: Q/ ZS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)- v+ y' V  ?' j
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!9 Q" C* k! Y; t# |+ }  J

2 T+ S8 B) u- R- l% f, _3 O+ y! BB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做$ O0 H% }/ C+ w. |8 M

% Y3 Y2 p* D+ i6 W8 b1 P9 n' pL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
) P% W5 F* y+ d) L, Y& I
4 b4 y( d- W! C' qF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,' d  o9 Q* Y7 O5 Y8 s6 \3 p
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
& B5 s$ x0 T# a1 u5 G
  c, U$ {3 `  @% k; a- q# O3 K( Q[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
( |- L8 w7 B3 n+ Y( W% h! S" T而家答多次
9 z& }7 B: L+ `f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
9 |# M- v2 ^  H$ cl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架) x! V( m2 J! j" H
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢5 d) A1 `' B: l8 K2 q
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.4 N  J3 q1 @' C) }! `8 i  E
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
) ^6 Y! w8 W# |  c0 W6 I# f4 v5 H# H% L3 ~
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
9 h- b- t; x/ M# pF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度3 w# d8 z# m* _, h
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
! O9 V: t/ p( ]3 b5 k' u6 n# PS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
: \" N$ x2 c6 {8 n3 |. }/ aB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
2 K1 E# v5 K9 I7 n9 @$ i: LF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
9 {( M8 ]' q5 d. mS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
6 g  H, _% d5 u! L, t5 tM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法8 p2 o- C: \) J$ Y2 Z! l
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果) T4 g3 o7 U6 D' c& G
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情3 q( `! W; C" K; h1 ^

) ^! H; F( b3 w4 R) M9 f  D3 h世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
4 i+ |$ m$ A* @7 cL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
) y! @! k* j- ]% J! ?  ?# wB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
8 {, ^6 v6 ^# X& uS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件) N5 `9 a* ^3 [" m0 U
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
, l1 A2 F1 ~9 cM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

& |* Y5 g" Y$ E; V7 I
: j9 s7 [5 W* [  L same choices with u , but want to add some comments
+ C9 s6 H4 D* E- Q; \; O* q1 e. p: K4 Y7 V/ |9 J7 o4 b
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
  \' M! C# ]# j) C5 }7 y2 R0 T4 W6 L: G; j! o. B' U/ U
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )+ [6 I8 j. F4 p: ^- n& _

0 h5 J7 X) Y8 R1 M) \: C* zF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome % M6 n+ j: \; n7 N5 s

& |- c" I" z+ I( L, d* b1 Y& PM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......9 {& f$ l( z% x" J

% Y2 C9 r) h% {0 ?$ Q% c2 H/ h[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge4 y% u1 z5 b1 r3 @
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
2 H$ v2 T  h4 E/ t$ x! ]9 b1 ZL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
$ Q. @5 T$ Y& N1 S! zF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
! u2 @: q; `. A/ K% c5 [7 K+ c' K7 e% U: [1 p1 e# Q
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
/ a7 z  x3 {* @, n- k; W% ^有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，; f$ K. D( ~9 U+ X, s/ E
由最好開始排起既話，
) ]8 U& Q1 O% ~) r5 x4 O/ {4 ^L B M F S 啦，* j7 k: \7 N  e# p) g1 ~3 ~, `
. U- b2 n% E7 B1 p" P
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，& \0 v5 f: [  x/ `" m, G0 \2 Z
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？1 `6 I) s# Q4 c, a7 r# A! J2 N. _# I
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
# b  \: V0 I& P: C又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
" A, \! s3 u" ^/ \: S4 z/ i
1 o, b& u, y# {/ P2 g* Q% Z! B1 K而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，0 m- z+ \" X8 R$ W, ~
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
9 Y0 U9 {& l2 u+ z" y8 K明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
5 g3 H! q3 K  i  V! T! K. u! o5 F- Z9 ]
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，( f9 s7 J  u) R$ \  K
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，# a4 ?9 ?* ~0 W" C0 b
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，1 b4 i" H8 W4 z; f
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，# A, A/ ~$ k) z0 [+ ^
M 都可算壞了。
1 o1 f& A0 y/ _1 m3 O# i4 k! M7 \: C# {/ |# n2 C/ X
F 呢個人仲掂，
5 c1 Z* J1 {) h* Q2 ]1 q/ c- E知道既唔等於要講，
6 u" Q6 _) C2 Y7 h& X如果呢件事發生係自己身上，- Y* [) {* r- J5 q2 q
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
: Z( R  p8 R- }$ R# K- c0 Z+ r* p( D5 d2 j& G  N
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，: n5 ?* V) R' c/ n( q
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。, r5 o1 w$ j( x1 E/ E3 A
, o5 ~  [# h: W
2 {; _3 B" Y( i2 J# b, W
: C+ w" e! [4 I  D( Q
題外話：  a( `& c7 X; ^7 d" l4 @
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，. H! C- C0 c% b! ?, b$ D4 j
睇到 S 呢條友，& d( E$ a: ~0 B, P" G3 W
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L1 c* E: w. b6 R. d" B& o5 ^
/ V6 p- z( _  S& H3 [- W* x
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!& t3 D: R, G5 V* K2 p
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係8 B( y2 l* h) N  i; l& L
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
7 m$ b" u- Q% n+ j6 D( p$ BB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害$ b( x# @2 a0 ?
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...