Rika

由最好排到最壞: k9 X9 f4 W& ^2 i! I
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong8 g: c' E( V6 L9 g* L
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
9 Q3 Q) y" X4 m9 US, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her+ s. a* \3 j  m4 ~- I  a! J" o
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure- [9 D  P0 X) _$ @
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:$ Z; m9 f) q4 D1 [' u

  A8 D) ]$ ]2 i2 H5 rM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
- z6 \" ?# {; y8 n% H/ Y& |6 K3 s4 c5 p& x* k9 B# u6 n
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
6 p, s% i* a' u8 m0 X9 Y     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
* P8 f3 Z7 `  F, a. l0 o9 `! F9 Y4 H# p- a3 x, M: Y' B+ `) L
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
  C1 H; R9 X, p/ W( Q' v) Z  K
; t9 ^! D( v) ~% I& _L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志1 K: q! V( C. \$ T+ G: j( E

2 x  c' j2 j- _( v1 rF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,* }" `) D% Y, v4 s
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
4 ~1 Z" |4 ~; p1 v- w2 M
" ~3 K' D$ s' T[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
$ }' K# N) C& J) C/ C8 T而家答多次
- j- I3 T, K4 j6 I6 F; zf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
" M  q/ `& i0 Y% }0 V3 ll: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架4 W. C2 e/ l2 w7 {' a' W
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
7 q3 o( N) s5 E: A, Gs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
  ?' g/ R  _$ Q9 Xm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S9 g" _* S0 ?% p$ M8 h% s
- |8 ?$ ?* m9 S+ G
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大1 [; M1 G- u9 {5 l% N* v, z6 E- c
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度# m' l3 @# L: J* z) I, e- C' L% }9 q
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒* Q& d4 v: i: n# l
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢- ?9 x9 l" d& v0 _3 p, }6 i. K0 O
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
' p& Y- M" c' yF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
' s% s+ ~2 A: G1 a7 oS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
( u0 k* {! v! TM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
6 H) H- {" ]/ }" C2 zL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
  `6 W0 T( `% f, i# Y- CB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情0 E1 q! g1 W0 R$ N$ P1 _9 R

+ w. D+ S( t% P  h  a0 Z6 a( ]- I世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:9 Y% B4 D9 v5 x' G! t* l. ~" Z
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己' I+ r: U/ t8 ^! r4 d
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
/ N, N7 K1 w$ D, Z3 N: _( bS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件; Z9 e7 h2 |- i( O; ~
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方: N: O6 P+ ^& ?6 v
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

' r7 u# S  m" G: z
0 u" W% d% u* m( L+ o3 F' G
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
* t6 R$ s" V# h3 w, g( d$ L1 u; y+ H
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
. B' x$ J$ S" h6 H, o' d+ y& P5 n! K6 ^/ J9 F
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
* {/ P% `" Z0 _# p6 s4 U" b% a
7 `3 S  ]. K, V# A! VF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
, B" J3 X. ?; ^8 \1 W( {+ C6 n) ?: ^' }% e! `
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......; n5 D7 K4 R" t" |& Y0 Z; |
" V) q( X1 Q4 X! `+ N" R
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
1 u- ?. b/ \8 A" d2 TM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢& Q7 j! {& c; [* C0 {  G% i& g$ B
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點- b: Z( f8 f% O
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma: {5 B9 l6 c$ q2 t' x& ~$ P4 d8 ?
# {4 |2 n/ V. F/ o
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....- W* f/ E( n3 R" U% d
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
  e- d7 K1 d+ X% k. R/ f+ a9 A由最好開始排起既話，
& ^* w+ K& J+ x2 jL B M F S 啦，
4 l8 z& Y0 o8 U1 m
  d" z3 l$ ]+ a其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，3 Y3 ]2 Y4 r7 \* M6 t+ A/ e
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？1 v1 N! a; K% N
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
! N# w8 l6 R. n6 m  B3 c, Z又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。! v, Z2 P% N0 d

, }2 ?; @8 O( }$ ^. n; `而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
0 U+ a/ t$ ^. q3 Y. c所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
: K8 p2 ?& l! u0 {8 j明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
" {$ O3 y( w; c9 w. R+ B' O+ a8 Q1 b6 |2 ]4 W
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
) s6 W1 Q8 N( \4 O$ K M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
4 R& |/ U, e! A; q6 V& W亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
! G6 @8 l( M$ h1 }: }知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
  G8 `: H; {* `5 @1 S M 都可算壞了。* U% w  U" z9 [3 \/ i# W
3 J: \* s. h8 p' p) D, y
F 呢個人仲掂，
. P$ C- \$ S& F$ U# u7 A- u知道既唔等於要講，
! @9 x0 b, w! n* R+ t7 M/ S如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
7 H; O* X: U3 {5 U我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
/ M  S; H, V* g( h, X( Q. V9 ~9 f9 a9 Y* C. q+ _
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，; L3 r9 e6 |9 Y% K
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。7 U. P6 _  }' |  `: k

* H: u8 ]2 k. H- X0 X& ~
# Y, s# n) l4 z* K
. r! C( ?, K' H7 i1 e: L- J- b題外話：3 [) M* I6 h. {6 f% `# o  y
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，. X; V) }6 z4 _7 v5 t" ~' _- t; V
睇到 S 呢條友，
, k) z/ d* V) U. {我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L; Q6 F; }3 i* b+ y. @

" _; w5 c" Z4 u7 e$ y+ a6 A8 g/ a% zS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!$ [! p2 E  a9 ^' P. G
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係4 h6 Y+ F! V$ s. J0 I" y3 L
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
) f0 t. N# \# u: {5 yB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害. h) Z: a3 L) ^& y$ M3 B
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...