Rika

由最好排到最壞- B; G) W# V* P+ d( d4 w8 ~! N
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong( P% l& s% E- t1 Y- q5 [$ x
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount; \  F) K; o6 [$ D; c+ o& T
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
* _- {1 ]3 }! B# j; C' FM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
2 Z% `8 A# o4 `* U/ q/ Y6 qL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
& Q( D% y- l6 H* o# O- H  l, z) B5 j8 @0 s
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
5 K# G# }. k% l$ Y
7 v9 Z1 r( J. e4 J% _S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
( I) j- g/ o3 ?     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!$ X- @" r6 l. B2 v( G; b+ H

' \; s2 b- \- I- w0 y* hB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做' r; {% k- I( v
+ a/ G* o+ i/ g6 y, U4 ^
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志0 B( [6 ~9 C# g; [0 g* R4 e' j

. S( i2 Y0 y# ^; e; Y7 W" VF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,8 o1 M$ U' i8 o* V
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好6 i/ Z" ~( n' P$ Y, k+ ~

) @& v& ^7 y( D8 I4 d[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案- c, N0 Z, `" x! V+ T; A
而家答多次
9 _  F+ w7 q( B* l, A0 o& @( ^f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽. Z, u, H! E. Y, z2 L$ m7 x
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
( Y9 p" p6 }2 d6 ~9 f; `1 Wb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢% Q4 v/ U; c3 c6 u1 O
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
0 t/ i( @3 ?7 p1 w: H6 ~m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S3 ]) ?# U+ [  ?9 h- S' g
- S4 e/ E9 r* _6 D4 K: y6 k) R( n
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
9 }9 t- C) E& v: }3 `, WF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
2 ]' D' L' |$ D) `% PM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒$ t  n( |2 ~' G8 T
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢' C( O* W& P* C
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
# @9 i, \5 F/ K" W" l5 {F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
# J& }! F5 k- k% T7 @0 h: T, BS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
2 @  C( I: S2 T5 ]M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
3 d5 H5 B3 B' OL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
% A' X1 [% D, x' N4 j1 \B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情$ D& B8 j% f! ]! b, @' d, L' E
- G* o- `$ ]! j3 _% l: }2 ~
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
4 X$ J( W6 e4 J# G6 o4 g6 X  g! jL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己) c$ ~0 F4 h% I
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘' ^( n5 z8 }6 p% E$ x
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件# Y: M- \& u0 p+ q6 o: H
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方' ?: C+ R( @( v! C. h8 p
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

, M" Q0 ^. s0 b4 ?3 |" a+ c; ~; d4 m6 B; i% V6 G9 ~
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
, W' ~2 @: r  D/ H% H* B! V- b: y- ~& D0 B5 e- i
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  ' t- C, s1 @6 D5 h1 y

: N+ F, j6 O$ ^+ ]) {2 N$ g7 T) z# OS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
0 B' w% ^$ k2 d; x" q- A/ @; |; I" }' U: F+ t5 \
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome $ m/ V  D& n% M5 E8 m( A8 t

7 U# {: i0 n2 {: S! EM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
  ]$ {) {- G1 e+ I8 H5 A/ g7 N. _1 b  E+ I  \% ]. T3 r5 Y. [
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge% z  I4 X. Y1 X! @0 h" q0 F
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
" d9 ^/ {$ ?( Z4 }& u7 @L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點0 ]9 }" p; Z- C& o
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
' F) {* C' v( n6 G. e, V+ y! w( k! @/ V
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....' E7 C  K3 o& m
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
3 f( M  d% u, ?/ B* {% s% ^由最好開始排起既話，0 b0 r( I: l" i  R$ ^/ ?6 K
L B M F S 啦，2 H! x* j- ]; q8 ^4 q5 g" h

: I! N& v& ~/ i2 ]: K其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
  o) [+ E7 b, R. Y! C* W- U但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？. h/ f0 b" Q, a1 z( ^1 V
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
8 Q6 v4 Z# w: d. @' E' v& ?又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
8 p6 H$ w5 C7 D( z9 ]+ i& G$ ]  m
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，8 @& Q5 X- w( \- d( R. i5 C
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，# K* r/ W; Q$ ^; P
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。& ^+ ?; X# I. F& w& O

: U' I! H5 H9 x3 l& a: C而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，& N& A- ?' N& @  {
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
0 J) B3 a# _. d7 N亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
: A3 X* X" I: N8 \- o) b& W- y知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
& M- `5 Y! J0 y: J M 都可算壞了。% o2 _# j+ f. b, h9 H! O4 X8 V0 z

1 I$ w5 {# I  L5 z3 M+ F F 呢個人仲掂，
, b; p8 R! Z( h, U知道既唔等於要講，# B% {7 k; [! A+ l/ J( H* v* u
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
9 t; g* x6 |1 f& j我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
( v. P  s* k7 H0 g5 U8 M/ x; l6 r. [, g4 ?$ j
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
/ i. r) N5 l, K$ G, ~* B始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。& q' ^2 R" ?* o5 k: N
/ C) t- a* x& y! r4 j
) w' I0 H' Z$ C
, n0 B) c1 G& A4 Y. z5 V3 K
題外話：8 s7 b. g& l' I
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，5 i& w6 @' O6 o5 i6 ~
睇到 S 呢條友，
* K+ I2 s3 a4 H9 \; M我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
. S) O" Q, {/ o0 y5 @* y
- Q6 g4 Y% H3 iS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
7 N) g5 Z# D' i% T$ v6 S  ]; h& NF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係/ g% ^# ^/ B. o! _9 E2 t3 {
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她# ^6 V! _; k* t, z
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害" d1 L4 m. D# l2 B4 J# K) L
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...