奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
# ?) O) f  u8 g4 b6 A2 `
# v6 p4 L; ?$ P  s3 U/ z/ Oagree," W. Z8 t  {: R) N8 b) }
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
/ `0 ]  `* b6 y但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,% \2 X0 s  }1 {; b
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

2 @# w- |/ B5 m8 @
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html  a2 P; [8 f* ~8 \/ k
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地7 k* L9 c! \- U, }$ ~7 {( @( @
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.; l$ D, j5 {) ?$ }1 h5 l3 N
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:8 K9 S6 \% {# X
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ * l- s& R* @3 `& U7 ?) t4 a7 B1 H# L
, Y, s0 |( f% c# f
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???. T$ l) `& W, E7 t; S
' [- C: Y, |. v1 X7 A+ b
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

+ W- ~8 r% o+ G6 V% U  p
$ b8 w; b4 A9 {* i5 F+ i6 l絕對支持啦
; |% t  O% H; ]+ T5 p3 C6 A' p, O1 N( w, h
有錯就認,打就企定8 O/ o- p5 l$ Y4 }5 z1 D( c
% K  e) T. w9 q& D) ~; ]2 U; c1 t4 ^
無錯當然要撐到底8 g& L" _( Y, ]1 L9 o. e) q
7 n" f# m" j( h4 a
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩, a4 ?$ H3 |9 V

" }- P! t" s4 z3 l3 E在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得8 |. f+ [: R. `; y1 S
, W2 |+ j4 M5 k/ M' @4 t
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力: A  l: j0 }! t

/ k* q  C/ w3 p$ J我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
  L2 `. b% g3 k$ d) _  q# h+ t. P$ T: ?4 v% L7 |/ b+ u9 r
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?; U; I1 G% {7 u& B6 Q1 F) @
4 a: ]4 |; M/ m3 i5 z
我唔認為lor
, {; m1 w+ D+ Q( n$ y9 h
  n# c. k: p( c唔係話要整死佢地) p; i# D+ i8 h2 l9 W' B
# J3 ~8 r- T( c  ^2 C4 z8 d, W6 p! r! ^
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用1 I- `0 N: v7 c0 \4 y& x: R6 b0 u

9 o! @; @9 c& E5 w' k我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大4 R/ r. m- |/ F9 l# Y

1 I( B4 t# K) z, r7 }+ r有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的/ V1 Q$ c8 b  J% x" L4 H
  _. z) Z4 I8 n. U+ o  n
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由1 W. f, `9 m+ ?3 G- }4 Q) y
$ _7 }" T/ f/ {5 T- V
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句& H2 F/ V1 j4 J9 B
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"$ N2 G0 L9 q2 Y* ~4 S' B

, h, m- M3 y! u我們的大學生
: A# \& x0 _5 L6 @/ x7 S2 o0 x! s4 t5 d# W

4 S( I+ K! H! d) C& I9 h/ m4 w" _+ u

; c- P, e3 c1 U1 C

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
2 E' T' B1 X( r8 w* d9 K
) q) v6 `8 o: g! C* H3 l( K" t  J: M) ^
有見地 !!!6 R( P: n0 m, p* `4 j
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
4 J8 G3 U7 Q2 \4 A* v( U
% Y* Y+ [6 s% v) `: }I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. , d  {- x: N! Y) k0 j
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. % ?$ Y" G) I* O3 t
I pretty sad that about the University official.% m0 H% T: I$ p8 t. L4 ^/ J2 v
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la* m6 C* g+ L, f: c4 k, \

- ?( ]  y+ C% w4 I+ {8 l[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
! ^# ?3 B, ~5 q7 Z( a' b5 c我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
) Z9 h( T2 [: k2 O. k
& D5 \% x, }+ {+ I7 N[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

, L' |9 v) I/ ]& H4 l, L' |8 K; n) P. P2 Z/ J2 B
兩者有何分別?
9 I: K9 S% g' E; A/ X# a# E6 x中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?