奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
* z" a/ Y2 P5 S7 d8 t; b0 n6 J4 c& u. V
agree,' x7 p0 D! P( S
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
7 n; z" D, L# }' c* t+ L但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
8 t+ y  ^" H, @, }5 `# d期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

( c0 m0 r6 q% ]$ x4 phttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html* M  m3 ]1 _0 u( L
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地! W( _" P2 g; M. m0 B# _
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
; m( I# t. d2 N; @Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
. P- S6 ]' N9 G* }+ `有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
% ]1 F# M7 c% M- g3 O5 @! A2 i" M& V% K7 c* K$ R
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
8 j: j  f; w0 Y6 x/ k! R
0 n& ]" Q9 Y* C& G6 z. H為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

$ ~5 A2 y4 ~. ^9 [1 ]& x7 {. |+ ?; T7 _/ h( B+ T5 M
絕對支持啦) N, m# v+ o5 g

! g# h- Z% S- i" B7 Y& `) W( Q有錯就認,打就企定
7 s! Z" L6 A$ G0 Q, n+ F, F) Z
, X+ Y' }9 s2 ?# R無錯當然要撐到底; ?8 M. u  c8 s

' A3 ^" P9 h% v, w但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
0 m8 w3 _* o5 S1 K7 R0 Z9 m3 S6 G, E+ C  P, r. R5 ]3 |$ }
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
( A% e; O) l* v' [1 y" \/ A# K6 {/ k, h( I6 H
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力1 {4 |! ~5 x& O
# p7 L8 {* i  L  j3 W" _. ]% f# I
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
8 T8 i1 {! h: Q( J% i% S# G1 Q. X; b1 o7 V
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
3 l# B3 O$ M1 N5 d9 L4 ?) d; e1 v& K1 `* E$ }% c" U) n% b
我唔認為lor% A1 f9 ]5 F9 {1 `

, u; R5 h2 u5 T+ W9 a2 x唔係話要整死佢地9 S( @+ G" _& s! Y4 Y+ @  D
  b$ U8 i$ O9 |3 H! Q
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用) ~! c; k# H" b: D5 }5 p
5 y4 C9 M. x. O" a9 ^, ~9 }
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
( [* q. C+ l" `& q! _2 k( y# y( F0 ]7 ?6 c
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的6 w, P, k; `6 o& s$ v+ R+ D5 F1 ]* Z

5 l# i& q  N  ?) j唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
* t" h( K: H: x+ P3 Q2 R9 }) N6 j* z7 G7 O0 o0 B( F
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句6 l) z: E7 N$ R3 `# ]/ J9 G
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"* I  O7 p* K1 [9 f  @

1 W8 U+ o; w. s" H- Z% B2 N我們的大學生
9 d, M! V  b3 w3 R. \8 ?9 H1 a( ?' [& B$ A# j9 I4 w

( W2 [8 E  x; z, v8 n. V
6 o- L9 ^( G. k. |- ~: j- a6 j& t! J7 F

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:. z/ q- ^; Z1 Y- S, @/ \
9 n: ], E- O; D  R4 p) A& C
5 v/ |$ D% [: `' ~2 [7 S' [5 ^
有見地 !!!
; _! X$ c% K# l7 p* {$ s現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
9 I4 @6 {1 d& J+ v6 j8 ^6 z  B8 u7 o7 |4 X; Z' W
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
" k& y8 b. i. W! y& y" fI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 6 B: V) P& x8 a# o
I pretty sad that about the University official.$ a2 {' P; J2 Q. o
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
$ [, C, u9 ~5 N2 O
& h; y: R5 P6 l* W[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:: t. W- {4 R* |* c- d2 R6 ~
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
* G* n5 w5 T! [7 F# v% j2 |
+ z# r4 X* w) K; [9 f[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

8 }; F) b, a( p

9 |. V& i  z& l. r+ n- X* d' i兩者有何分別?
! ^' w5 [6 A, [! u% n3 e$ \9 W/ R6 b中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?