奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:' Y  c& ?8 q0 R
/ h, k) q1 y+ ?$ P3 W
agree,( j$ R% ]+ y( @
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
! w' F. E; @0 E; V- k& b6 u4 |但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
6 Y: h% C# \% T" l, U9 h- P: T期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

8 w2 S+ w! ?& ~$ E! x) ^
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html: P- M% f# @% N4 F. p/ @1 w
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地9 L- ?' y2 S  A& b9 h( x
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.. w5 Q- j2 A* ~" P4 Y8 A- Y" I
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
2 h: Q0 A, H4 u$ C$ Z9 A有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ / y+ S* K1 z, G& ?+ ?' l0 s' ]  P
) b; O. B' U- }( t5 x
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
* f$ _; F" ], |7 O8 [8 K5 G" y6 J5 W" e3 H
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

2 v+ C1 ]! G& E' ~6 ~- S; D4 x" W8 Y! M: B7 E, b; x
絕對支持啦, i" w1 W, o; X- h

9 l0 j* K; X) K' Y有錯就認,打就企定
1 {! c6 p- g* M2 f" a3 }0 t" }/ X2 }. L! q+ g
無錯當然要撐到底
/ {6 u  e/ t$ t+ V2 b7 |) q
9 j+ }  @- c. W4 D( y1 U* }但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
' i, v' a" O4 N9 o, F+ c( R) J( \( O3 h/ |3 Z/ w9 W7 o
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
& p5 f0 m' j( h
2 Z1 w. l, s( @# o5 L& U, L6 n一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
1 B6 \- ~9 w" u1 M; [  l# D, p3 O$ e
) j) }: U: H$ H我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生) _- k4 D3 `6 W$ }; |, r

) a$ H1 i5 j6 V; B" S唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
0 x( x" Z& w4 z! t, f7 _/ {. P( \' H( M
+ s7 r- k( r. s' h" `4 |& G7 p我唔認為lor$ l1 i: i  H0 a. s% a

. |% ?5 t0 Q. M2 B  I. |唔係話要整死佢地+ W7 D' g" u- M3 D

' F, W! S9 o- B4 C而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
+ E1 F7 Z0 Z1 D5 t; K# L$ d# b. |" s2 i: f1 o
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
7 U2 X3 F. l( V1 e+ S! u6 _) |( Z8 {/ \8 ^# k. r
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
" ?, D, `$ K* A
' {( l3 Q* x( o+ c" ^唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
# l- w$ w4 S! Q* J
! o+ e3 ^$ s( ]& J1 O- ?: A大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句6 X% y9 O6 M* N& j
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
/ b4 f8 u/ ~3 O* s# @8 g: f2 C; b, }
我們的大學生
' f1 [6 p8 D+ s& L& @0 X8 v' ^8 X& K  c* b6 b+ q& m' V9 K7 ^
1 Q3 s+ F' J8 `: W4 ^0 S% i: v! W- B

& x7 k" [% t2 A% n
+ b' ~' i5 N0 a, ]8 X1 Z7 F8 e

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:4 y$ W0 B# S8 R5 u0 I$ N2 k

6 Y8 f5 V; ?8 G! u
- a- [, I9 r$ o2 [0 }有見地 !!!
  B3 @* q  N' {/ h) Q8 j- g+ N( t2 S現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
4 o3 r  U7 \" v
# g/ Y% ]# Z" D$ O3 g  Q% q4 wI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
+ N: S2 e( E0 f+ H! E( KI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. ! s  o9 F5 X" _0 ?- E
I pretty sad that about the University official.) J/ z: y/ A, ~$ z4 r" h
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
: n2 S3 O3 h( _" J, c/ @+ y' b2 Y7 Q5 l3 R
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
. V1 f" x% h" T+ D; z我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
! k4 y1 i  A% X* V, b) x3 |, U
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

% W# R* c6 D$ N$ @, i
, B' A# \3 P! v) _
兩者有何分別?
8 T  Z' V! E2 \* `8 T0 H中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?