奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
, v9 q: I# U: p* \* [) d5 t3 ~# o/ B. x& m  t
agree,# d4 g: b: b9 j9 @( {
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,1 u) y) b5 |! S; b
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
+ h+ `! _9 x  u4 I8 q8 [5 }2 {. i期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

! {+ |* Z1 b- y7 V) @/ khttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
4 c% y) I. l, l# ^5 r已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地1 X% B! w3 K2 }4 N" y. U9 m$ o
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.- F4 j6 Z3 g3 h( G
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:4 I  U% M" k. T& a
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
, g6 `& a' j, s0 f5 j5 e; ^/ ~' {  V$ z$ @  c8 |& h, _) C  J
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
2 _  V+ A9 d3 l
& f' x& |9 y( ?$ c+ S為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

9 [* _7 q* p! g5 U
( s/ e' b* @  z
絕對支持啦& m1 J' H# C3 Q

$ P; A! l. B% b& m; q) o" M' ?有錯就認,打就企定
0 x# B$ s4 e8 r
5 Q4 C; O9 u; h4 o0 f無錯當然要撐到底, G0 {; a8 h! i0 b, z+ _

; b) |4 X" u' h, `% `9 v但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
0 M8 J- S  `5 R
; U3 M+ x& S+ t6 j6 j在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得, _7 D/ Y& }& P7 _7 `$ ^5 M# o" \! l
3 F2 Z3 V4 _5 _" @* _6 t& G
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力1 L- z0 {1 [" u

1 }: D9 b5 I, e+ m/ E, ^/ I我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
0 G  [1 h" W. ?1 G
3 [/ x" F% C" I唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?1 M; G' Y. G3 W3 W5 F8 ?& \
# n4 I5 J  `: I# {+ U
我唔認為lor
8 U. U6 _- i' k5 O7 l" M% i, U4 n# Y" O0 G+ i1 @% E$ {9 H
唔係話要整死佢地0 }9 X5 B6 O0 u$ k$ m

' E5 v' d$ n" C% _: u3 D而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用: Z( w' `: y" [( t

; Y/ t5 U8 }) m4 U$ C2 X我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大2 i( P' E$ ^7 B2 l

6 w$ |  a$ v$ ^+ u* I有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
/ |/ s6 c) ~* m$ A  ~: m0 E' k, ?  D3 I. ]6 a. r8 `% r
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
8 K5 r8 Z- Y: N0 P" `# d9 g! j0 M4 p  v! e( n1 q, g  ^2 L/ E
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
9 x7 M, |; Y! w! M, l% t"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
6 t& H3 n' w, n( r/ O
$ [2 a/ r4 q. E6 B我們的大學生
0 R' T* ?" L9 ~% y# {: W+ h' n1 S
( z  F- n& w3 q, J6 i0 p, ?: T) s+ P
" x1 K' T% c( |  [* K
% \: L' f' T  b* d5 r" y

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:) h  ^2 Q7 g8 g7 v8 Z: t

: ~& O) K+ M+ m' ^3 ]4 E. T! @9 g: Z; T) |6 W0 ^6 e5 O
有見地 !!!
; H" }; n% b2 N/ k1 L( N現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
1 Y1 E' O3 g7 r8 Q7 V6 A1 S# a" ?- s
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ' v. R1 k8 }: W* D
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. $ a# M) u% j. F: b6 Z* f1 L
I pretty sad that about the University official." ]9 T1 }3 Z6 M
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la2 I! X5 a9 R5 w  R1 I3 E% m9 Y

5 p$ y  e' s8 |[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
2 o0 {! z1 Y( j0 Z) L- c! X: O我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la- s( z" j! L2 F1 M7 M& m# n
3 U; l/ l+ B! \: P& X; k
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

2 W5 A* L3 m' J" W" Q- q- i6 M  t! F% o* g4 p% m1 f& U, p5 r( c
兩者有何分別?
" [+ n- |$ M' x) f+ F+ }中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?