vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:
' c# ]% L, N+ T! h- U0 L% _, i( K反轉黎諗3 O. ~1 I8 H7 `( b- g
ps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版
9 A! x6 P: J. W: l7 p你睇下DC,X-box
& ^$ V! ^; A' ]同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比6 |* z2 {$ m5 c1 g: ^
你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

9 }  \( l$ M8 ^! E) ?7 p7 `
講中曬!!!
/ c& p3 v& S* A6 \$ `3 p: c3 Q
$ I( C6 O) I4 b- [0 m2 T9 U仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。1 x) N8 e( h: k0 R+ v0 T- r9 U

+ r/ Y& H& g6 O1 a$ p講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
0 N$ }) e. H! p9 d物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

" Q* K: ~- c: j
o甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖
( \4 ~! R1 L4 v) }+ x4 m" I, g5 Z
' d, G# |2 e7 X5 V: P: K要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps2
( R5 w0 b6 B0 o% s: k  }1 R3 `! a+ T: O) _( q0 c" a0 b3 f
其實政府今次立法原意係岩
+ t( m- @! Z) s( @7 R0 T1 J+ h但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權( x2 L, j; k' K0 S/ s( D) J
唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管
# w/ O  A0 d; R' X+ x7 V. |2 t
! N7 L: z: n' p1 F. v7 y, z另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事
( t2 w* f' Y: z3 Z. @; a一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢  o. e' @0 v" ^. g4 q
眾所周知/ K, [& l2 I! M$ J# e6 V
ps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版0 B$ v" o) K' M6 B9 @' V
佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps2
+ V$ a1 C3 k: J( V4 ~+ P% O& T到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
9 A0 ^3 H% s; G6 F) Y6 R* N* z) ]+ p5 s& Q+ e) E. F4 a
講中曬!!!
; q. [& T1 n4 g/ k# u0 Q
* d1 T8 M  E& y仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。! V2 O# [! t. W6 Z3 A% F

+ ^2 r& }, f8 U$ F% J; a% A0 ?" o& f; d講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

9 q8 @; I; q- ~" H1 U, r" }+ i: P對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~4 y! E! T9 w' ~  A" T  e

; \( K7 Y& j8 {* @6 sps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...0 M$ n& P* O, f
其實最簡單一樣野" E( n; r6 r0 k0 f7 H
正版好似翻版咁平0 U8 u7 m4 T3 _* ]! }" W' Z
或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁
1 W- D7 p7 G/ V- y咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?0 ]0 M% ]8 u9 j( w

3 i/ y& ~% u5 b( l2 ~! eBut I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子4 ^, s7 s5 V1 i* J. \7 m' T
因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,
9 g# c1 Z6 V. {% N& A但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法
# ^/ [6 A# V7 m, ^7 B我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣+ U" q+ |+ k/ T; y! c5 p% `2 H
再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關... H2 Y( P! R1 y. C3 Z) ~/ z- t
改機既用途$ z4 g% R& ?0 i  W, W6 [7 C4 H: R
如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉
: D( c  Y) q& `政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~ . k- Q2 O' E8 O1 \2 A
我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』