奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:. ~+ Q* R1 i5 A  a

# o7 S* D3 r. w( P1 \2 K, Uagree,
) N5 w" Z  ^, m& q. r8 Y' n我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,0 u& m! B, V5 a. q
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,3 ]3 L! P+ k/ b! k+ g
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

% h- m6 r1 l# l# Y& [
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
7 l0 i% x6 J' W, N4 J5 Y4 {已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地; K5 T+ ?* I6 M" f1 D$ h
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
5 G  ~: F. x, l4 X- c2 q- EJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
" n- t! ]- k* y! K4 k* t/ O有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 2 E3 E/ I" f5 e0 ~( U
) x6 _9 J5 ^* w: L$ G, L
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
5 Z4 e0 U4 }' u; p$ }- v- D6 v% `9 Y2 `7 i$ a0 I9 l
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

5 z. u) R  m" X5 p3 J$ Y

; U# W  x0 v' a+ {- a絕對支持啦& E& G! m6 @7 m
; s8 s) n: {5 ?4 k9 i  U
有錯就認,打就企定: [8 g$ j: Z/ N# z7 d0 j

# ^. H/ N% Z: n. d' p4 U8 G無錯當然要撐到底" M% ]- j* y( G* x# D9 ]

3 A' k  U4 n, T6 k. f3 }但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
6 ?5 j& v3 B5 z# f- b1 B) n
# D# K- o( j8 ]6 B! C9 v在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
6 Z+ P. s7 ?0 d3 j: p# x! Q% m# m# K/ V, R9 e( N8 x
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力0 [2 i- l5 n9 Y- f' W

* v( ]& P4 Q' ?4 L+ k8 ]' u6 b我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
3 T* ]/ ~5 h. [& W8 C. Y0 l) v
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?. j; G2 G" h8 v1 }7 l/ w4 ^
1 C$ v4 q4 E: [# G
我唔認為lor
" a( D6 {  s& }' _: K8 C
" G* y3 C9 ?5 D' y* y唔係話要整死佢地( v% q& r8 v: D
# h9 g( v$ m( p! {' u
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用  P4 c6 |5 |7 j3 f7 L% x% f
, X  ~" ~4 f: `3 B2 c6 T: T# n
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大9 y9 q& Y% V' g/ @" }$ _) [

' o; _$ |5 K! i有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的" |  n$ O7 ?! |" ~( J0 e0 K3 B
9 Q* n$ f+ a0 f7 a( @$ a. E
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由8 C  u8 [; [2 }& u

: n) ~" ^) ^+ A6 I+ z大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
* \% W: D1 M1 ~' l"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"  j4 N. N/ ]/ ?- F2 ^- R' G' H
3 J- Y% \* \. n. p; p2 T
我們的大學生
- E9 i" c5 i  D$ l
% W- X4 e3 X3 D& t$ h
- x$ E4 @1 x# ^: y! v/ }: P& u. x* i/ [3 n4 K  U  r) |; E2 }8 Q4 e

& t6 w$ {! w2 L& l, h

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:# ~2 Y- ~. ]  j" U0 K" l5 c

! B" t; K7 b+ R9 v1 d+ w# `( l2 p
有見地 !!!2 a$ {9 D7 x7 t5 ?1 H" ~2 M
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html- f) @! f( z6 B+ L5 w  o& |

% v# P7 _5 H* \I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. , z9 E8 }7 a9 @& Y8 F
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
/ A; [" a2 ]( wI pretty sad that about the University official.) c" ?3 l3 D% w- Y; D1 r1 K) X
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la* E6 g/ ^7 Q7 S  O2 p1 `

, `: t9 [" r  @0 q- D[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
7 n* I8 v: X: x/ ^. N. U* p我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la$ O, R. A* w( F. u( Y8 U
9 R. n3 M4 B7 @
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

2 \2 L# b: }, [$ F" P. f% F* D
3 R& c' R) B5 x% K兩者有何分別?3 J1 q$ H9 n# [. A' C
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?