奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:8 S) k, I* T) W; z

- a7 T3 F) ]. c9 I. Y2 o# F, u- a4 }9 w2 Wagree,
* h% ?% o- H9 J; ]2 y# a2 _9 ?) E8 D我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,! i7 L+ j* M4 E% u
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
0 m4 R% a, n' A期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

$ r; W+ _) r8 o- H  p8 Rhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html* H% X! v6 _- y0 H  e# N: M
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
7 H; Y. ?5 i- \0 s+ L搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
( e/ F4 K, H/ X( i% rJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:& ?) C- V4 f. j; R' m3 D
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ # s. r! B! k2 K9 C* i4 |

; B6 }/ t. R1 q8 q5 t) X, |9 c$ K係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???9 ~. Z4 n6 G* B7 S' I1 ~" r8 v3 b4 f

: u  Y( w! R" p1 n' c6 p3 I* ~為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

) t* ~3 q  H) s( p9 `: K
- ^# S" f7 l# i+ I" V) A$ M* ]絕對支持啦. ^9 n4 f( Y' Y$ o: N! y; n! ]! e: [
* B3 d2 V- D5 y6 |; b' F
有錯就認,打就企定
+ q$ I/ h3 j5 s4 S, \- n% T0 K+ E
( a- w2 y0 d; q/ n無錯當然要撐到底5 s9 o7 O2 c; C: W' l
0 i7 z. ]( Z" z7 G0 o
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
% c0 l- c3 ^" q/ n8 Z5 c- C$ j4 F3 s( _* W3 t) s
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得( f; E9 s! ?% c$ ~8 D) v
5 m& C5 c& \" a6 j0 Q
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
, G- ?1 S( S3 {- F% g4 `0 e" R9 n% O9 E; o/ w( _' e
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生: C1 c  l' S9 j# _$ N

5 r: m' {& {" _' l9 d唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
0 E: {2 ^* s3 d( q) r) D
/ j' Z* T% u! N& l5 _" c, M我唔認為lor
8 N& B/ U7 Q$ p. o2 U' I6 [3 F8 k: @1 n2 ?% y5 @
唔係話要整死佢地
5 J+ M. R5 v- c& i! U) L5 h1 D& K+ g' i
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用9 l6 B3 R8 @1 a2 }, k, ]6 {
4 [- Y7 L' D* W; g, [0 F7 \$ k
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大4 U, q9 j8 M( q! K2 i

% l* }( M1 V) f5 S1 X% e% a6 @3 f有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的0 s% B5 ]9 C5 p& @- T! ?

: c: u' n+ q( r唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
; `% }; }$ C/ g9 J  D0 T5 f$ u3 [  }+ [2 U$ C8 ^( K
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
4 T0 [* U0 ~+ u: x"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"9 |2 y. `/ U- p! Y$ e! ^) i) _1 c: X

6 f/ z5 K# U2 a' e7 Y我們的大學生' I' G0 a' A3 z( i( F2 N: W* y" J

4 r1 r, Y- }1 \+ j$ d& O( `
- p$ u9 N1 J* i4 E2 `/ ^2 b1 S  Z
: P+ p" Q6 m! O, L2 e1 [$ I6 b( H* Z, s  s! F; D! \

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
% r2 [! Z( L- C. S6 }
# ^# S* ~& k- S) E$ s
! D+ }/ L9 N8 J: ~7 M4 h; N+ C/ n有見地 !!!/ t( L( E7 q6 ~, y% x
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html: m, X# |2 a$ l

; J- h# U* R# D/ y4 M3 y3 vI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
# q9 s( n! R' Q+ A% QI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
/ J! o; }# \5 x( I% U' `, S' F# sI pretty sad that about the University official.
, U8 M: N% \) T  P8 f& S  YIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la( c/ P  }' {0 \0 f

  v) T+ z  C$ I9 ^  |- X[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
: ~! g- W6 t/ B3 c. H我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
& R; ]1 d1 O# d% I
3 Q/ D' X2 I0 J% p  t8 o, I2 \7 c: F[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

6 I: P) {' N' {

# U; ?0 R" i0 {4 _; L: s& T/ t, E5 T8 m兩者有何分別?. ]5 d, R& ]1 d! i, {/ R1 V
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?