vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:" U0 [; F4 T" C4 E7 {2 i
反轉黎諗# G. H$ u* m- a" d
ps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版
0 ]' G' I5 e$ T你睇下DC,X-box, {1 t7 R& t+ ]( W$ m
同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比
( O8 M3 F% t% f) p  C. A你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

7 J$ a9 z$ Q+ z% E+ |; N# B8 U
講中曬!!!
+ ]+ c$ e, j" x' |; ]6 h: ?+ x2 ]1 {0 s' d1 }- G
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。9 J1 Q0 z( `6 A7 I: Z5 B6 ?

" h+ T3 r3 p% p4 x# I1 d講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:9 f4 r" c7 c  {0 W
物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

4 g9 b7 `# Q) |8 d7 t+ ~o甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖! h9 R) e( p) h/ F2 q( x: `; J$ b
4 {9 T1 U- H4 D4 C
要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps25 `: e, n5 b9 e$ b* \7 H- d% i
% V5 ]  y- Q7 x0 V; f; S, y! z3 @: V
其實政府今次立法原意係岩+ ~' _2 Q( x3 R0 Z* `( T8 ^
但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權5 o9 I( L' Y2 s1 P0 k
唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管
2 @- i% g$ x; ^+ E/ Z5 j* p
+ {% \1 D" G* \& n: {  n6 i另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事) y  `& F) o+ ~7 s2 m
一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢+ B. h4 |) ^: p- P
眾所周知
9 W( q8 F# g1 Xps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版. h1 B/ e# `: W5 ?: z' [' L. d) Q
佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps25 q9 _1 U6 j+ w' C' D1 b# b8 [( D3 w
到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
- J1 H  X* r6 p
1 k8 z* f  S+ I. c8 ^7 p; M& |" r8 d講中曬!!!
" y3 e% a/ C! b$ Y: e& [' C+ r3 E) O$ V; [
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。
. y; |' L) \9 a( {$ K& K2 K+ h2 `! T; D3 v- }" ~/ C4 K
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

; K2 w% J/ W+ w5 [" r) r
對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~
5 b3 _+ A+ Q$ s) r# D4 H6 ~
  H6 t4 N3 Z4 [4 h2 yps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...
/ I) n2 `) r& I- j9 m- {2 c其實最簡單一樣野
' I2 S5 A# P% ~/ G" @正版好似翻版咁平
5 w( M6 y, ^* Q& p- ]# m或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁/ ]2 `: z8 n4 z8 A7 Y
咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?! w3 z0 ~5 b9 r9 L6 t: f
5 b! ~7 M2 N, J! N; O/ Q5 Q
But I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子3 v. k4 w; r! b( @; R
因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,
, E) T% _/ }; v+ m0 x7 b( h但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法
- d8 Y' Y4 U$ y5 T( x' z我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣, {, I; [; N3 b: y4 a% @
再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關... N( I' m9 G4 d& j2 {$ b
改機既用途
' U, M0 Q& n# P  n7 x$ O  l1 w4 z如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉
# ^  ^5 A+ E$ F, U+ o  ^/ M, |政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~ - v4 X) q0 r1 {
我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』