Rika

由最好排到最壞
" u3 D) j6 N) E1 g3 PF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
) i3 E  F# D* [' @B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount7 ^4 m9 g3 g0 O2 R& ~
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
$ K+ s* v$ ?0 K4 z+ J0 iM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure0 p, c' A5 |$ t" x, d( p8 ^; R, W% s
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
1 T& X: v: ]% t1 ]% e* ?5 f/ g
0 X% j* X3 y* y* z" NM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
/ M5 l( Q# L$ j) l6 J0 `
, n# z3 N* y/ u6 oS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
0 A7 a3 i& Q/ x! r- ~     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
$ g! l9 O1 `; {  V& x3 m$ v
; |( Y  S# I3 C% lB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做4 B8 s; |# g% W/ o! }

3 |+ x7 v7 E5 w, f# G3 d' ]L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志/ P" ?' p+ M- K5 z$ m! r( |

! n& R3 ]2 S9 s% V3 RF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
) A, a& w. m7 d, J- z     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
. b# C% P: T0 i% X3 s! e" }- a* J. j* g) w7 ~4 t8 M- e0 Z
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
4 z1 |+ [# Z0 M- C: G# h6 H9 r而家答多次+ @+ e. u  Z4 y
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽) j: L( \: ]0 V* s( d- K3 f; W
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架! B; }: _; u. _( }' I& I: _
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
! W) T0 u# r: l: h# D; @: cs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
  @! [" o/ F4 b; Bm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
. Z6 {6 S6 R6 H5 ~. ?: \0 a; |, x& e1 K6 I" I6 D" Y) w
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
, N/ ?0 X* O3 O2 Z% ^0 B2 {F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
1 t# L! x! ~$ oM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
8 _2 v' s5 g+ b2 Z+ b# a4 ]. ]S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
& M. N  m& B! ]6 G+ FB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞) W% T+ ]9 r( Y- R' f; q
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默". }$ i4 O: p2 m" T7 Q) {7 t
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
7 Q7 ]0 h) D5 x7 s3 aM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
: _5 _, _; G1 n" t( r. G* L- oL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果7 y# F1 [& w6 p! m8 g
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情, j! q) [3 g. C) r3 k9 u

" [+ q! q# J0 M世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
) w; H: `  i+ B7 Y7 E  \. z- i* KL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
6 N  |% X! C# l% \: oB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
/ T" ~- w7 C+ G8 RS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
  K, O. h! ?" ?! ~8 Z( G& kF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方1 e" D1 Y. Q6 I5 S8 M- m/ w
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

2 h3 n, |1 o' g8 l* k% V$ y/ C" l+ t7 H, ?0 {
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
8 a# m; K4 _: C& Q$ Y0 C& h) [) B2 _" N. m* I. `- R
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
9 C* D+ J: Y7 D- ?! w7 j$ W9 Q
. l) T* y0 U0 L* ]% [S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )! [+ S  I6 s. K

" [( _1 v1 D  z, k9 tF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome # a  G8 B# ]  v& v$ J  M! ~( d
0 b. I2 Z2 b- p, O0 b) w5 U$ n
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......) w" b- _: ^# j" e

4 _. j% o9 R. c$ d[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge' ~( Z8 N. |' F! U3 M' r2 n
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢: d! C6 t/ u' \: ^# U
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
+ m9 a3 R' d" [+ R) b% k8 vF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma$ r" n6 q5 M& g
' C. N" [$ _2 Y1 q% C; a0 `; R' }8 S8 Y
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....% [% B3 y; j/ _
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，$ N+ N- j( S# q# k3 ^
由最好開始排起既話，
2 F' l  p+ S9 f" f6 i0 C) A* l- RL B M F S 啦，4 `- L  B3 [4 X; R' B6 s7 x
9 S/ N& z# f9 _2 u6 O; K1 r
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
0 C, G6 P; }! B! g3 C& d但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？- \6 A! p2 C2 q% g) j
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？8 t: y$ D. Z- K: i' r
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
7 D# e" |! X9 J# |5 O. k8 H& u* u2 T1 i% F6 M& J
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，; F0 X, P2 w) A
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，- X8 q; ~$ w# B7 w& ]1 l7 Y& L8 J7 b
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。0 Z5 e1 H0 p! W: K7 @. D% _
/ b' ?+ Q9 o8 N7 x* t$ X
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
( u0 I9 M1 j/ w- b3 t M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
3 I+ i4 x: p- T  v5 f) j亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
' S5 I+ |1 }! ~4 d8 Z7 l# e0 R知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，( }1 x/ S, Y: z; N' t
M 都可算壞了。
1 |- W, d: ^0 L/ E/ x/ D3 }& s
# j3 U. _1 X! N4 t$ T. J! d3 q% o F 呢個人仲掂，$ y$ s9 e) D% Z. U0 X' t
知道既唔等於要講，
# m: |+ y+ [6 Q) S# d9 @5 E$ p如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
7 V+ L4 f7 Z7 _, T/ D; M我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。3 z' W. O2 {, q5 w8 Z$ o
8 }: \4 Q0 C/ V+ a, q# v
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
2 F5 V" L; m/ m& Z* z始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。* B$ h0 q* }6 S; Q# t) E
9 V5 Q& C8 {  b/ R+ y

0 w1 x! n, L9 L4 P7 _# I$ I+ N6 }
: T; k/ V  p2 L( L題外話：; v) U/ s8 Q) g  V
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，5 Z5 _$ K) }* C+ C
睇到 S 呢條友，& R8 e* L$ f7 R5 X' Y3 v: j
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
* J1 g- e2 ]  W( D, }8 h
" i* P: ^# {- G) ?; b' `9 ]* y* AS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
+ u1 I/ d: [" ?+ _( b$ F5 [F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
8 Q8 q- w; p! H/ X' t+ vM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
/ e* F4 d0 b: o0 I, e4 F. nB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害8 D7 L! e: T( ~. }
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...