Rika

由最好排到最壞' S5 {  K9 K) u
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong. p* }) ~6 W; x% Y: ?; S
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
. }# u* S& `; c/ J3 U/ R# zS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
8 D- s  ]& j& |' w. i: J! i, YM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure8 C, b5 Q: X: g
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
' ?- h9 ]! c* e, r
2 }& u7 U9 F/ nM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
0 b, ]$ C: e7 F" N
" X" s. k4 m& M$ [3 J3 n  w1 LS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
7 @/ x6 W/ a" g. J& x8 s     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
/ X4 \. c9 X% p6 u2 D* |& J" G  a3 z* ]( }* i' c' B! Z/ F
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
+ a7 X% H" ^" g3 `) O  `6 @# t+ {+ S/ l' |
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志/ R+ U- z+ Q: k* R$ E
; m; o7 D: l8 v3 s
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,9 w1 y1 P3 k# T2 q2 A
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好3 k. g; s8 `4 u. L

* `+ z& {% o, o3 n2 R[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案* v) g# J, l* r) F8 d3 s% J
而家答多次5 [/ }) X9 ?, Q& H
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽& R0 c0 |: B( h' L" o
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
) {: U  \7 ~" K! C; C" Ib: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢0 \% h' w* q% E* W* p. K
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.3 U) g6 p. Q% ]' o9 u! T
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
0 ?/ e' _  f, W  F1 ?7 g
% w# a; w7 z! [! |0 ?4 Y1 c3 CL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大6 o! N8 m+ h+ t, n, w
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
* D9 b' K7 j8 A  }3 b/ _. AM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒. S& F& d$ K. d; h- Z% O5 y8 P
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢  ]/ X4 ^, w  i& a& b2 x- c
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
# ~) _3 r  N+ V7 K2 r. c. tF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
; W+ n: A9 d7 kS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
& o* {/ E7 X6 O" hM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
7 }; ~% f0 \3 V/ m+ F) u: {, FL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
# a( O; ~+ L1 L: l9 |B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情( v% \8 o! q' j# Y- S
, l: Y% Z# U2 l$ s, o; E% `0 T& k
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
) L) Z2 \* a; \6 k, k. g" K, wL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
2 R* B+ @: R2 K# C" Q9 n/ `1 NB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘: x! G; S  F3 ^( T. r: Q3 V3 W
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
2 b6 Q& R/ B8 qF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方/ m5 }' r/ \4 j/ n' K% t( j( P
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

* Q. X$ F, E6 }8 G2 b$ [! p# p0 ?9 i7 K. k0 N0 ]
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
0 o7 N# |! B* q. }* B( T" v
& @9 |, D( \. E! [3 lB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  : O2 l* ]3 E  R! G
4 m1 c2 Z- O% s! ]9 q
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
1 [$ M! b5 D' k( U4 U" D
) `) z. x+ v1 n' h( Y" Y5 xF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
9 y5 G# D9 |+ D; q7 q- Z
1 i6 z8 h; B( k9 m0 Q' mM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......; D# F+ K9 p& u
3 ?, K" K0 X& Y& \
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
) @! Y* D  x5 L0 _1 I, l% g: XM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
# d& F; a0 p* z5 N% E, eL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
' y( Z( O4 t! K/ E. D: g6 YF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
' S" m6 U) f2 d4 D
- m. C; c- O5 `  }最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
9 I* c, J" _6 U; T( \( R. J; x有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，# x5 }4 I8 t, p% Q) Y0 m
由最好開始排起既話，# c# Y7 b5 g; ?+ {' w7 o
L B M F S 啦，; N2 X( }5 w. Y" a# j" f+ h

9 n6 x( {: W9 Z- g# t* |其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，9 P2 G% l$ ]- ^+ {: ~# A
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？0 h' C" g2 z8 k
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
( C% D5 s+ T9 Z3 o4 n% n- F! a又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。! \  {4 S6 j& |3 m5 N! P+ U; M  _
. F5 M+ G" q$ f- K" y
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
* g3 n, _& p, U# |8 P所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
' O  E6 s/ y+ ?7 M明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
' z; Y: a. e% u0 h/ h9 J5 q0 h
: B) v$ E) \6 Y  ^0 A8 C' V3 z而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
0 z/ ]4 J  p* L M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，/ ?1 }0 h( h3 S! i; E: u, M" I/ ]
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
) v. f2 a7 Z7 |# C! Q: H知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，$ ^7 l; l1 ^! N+ u4 Q" j$ w
M 都可算壞了。. }/ f$ i; i& D# k6 B; ?

7 X% V1 c/ C8 i: K9 R1 o& C; E' w F 呢個人仲掂，
: i9 Q/ `% H+ h6 ^+ @知道既唔等於要講，
7 \& Z4 j) a: A2 A! W# Y( s. E3 v如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
! e+ ?+ o: F3 G! g我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。' z- H: w: P& D6 }

. a$ N! ]# a) y7 n. T+ i4 F最衰個個緊係 S 啦，2 S1 }; z8 @  Y# L* V
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
  K0 p- K% G# N$ n( T9 u/ K. i) h# M7 ?* S$ O9 J- O
8 _8 N/ \8 t7 Y. {, d2 G

3 K  [  [) e2 Z4 W; r題外話：. R/ a4 z% z! d+ Y
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
; M7 ~7 b$ k% I2 j; a: r睇到 S 呢條友，
1 q! p+ \1 Q) [  l( N6 H4 W# A我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L8 ]6 U' j! W4 s, _3 C

6 C% g1 O6 v5 F4 |3 T. n$ U7 DS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!3 C& ?2 t0 n, ?! C, [
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係% C" B; U0 l! W4 R# @: B( l+ m
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她7 u3 b2 B4 K# g$ g$ E
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
8 e9 g) E& T0 T5 a( T5 b+ b9 lL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...