Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:. I4 E2 K/ w  t6 f; L
2 s  V8 T& _$ C8 R4 V

7 J' q% F. J" I3 ]- K' Z9 Z9 W' y( w我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

9 C. L0 W; l$ t, z: ]. O; S1 c
' G# [7 I5 W: ^7 X- y9 E& |In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:" R. B% I0 N6 m5 V( _! B) _( N. y) q

5 p; m: i# p3 y4 ~0 b1 l$ }$ Z4 _( K) M! |# D( s1 [
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

/ w, o- X, |3 a2 J! s
4 r1 t+ U' G) I3 J8 Aoh really...& X. Z( T. C- ]. L/ _# X( u1 q% s1 h
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"' ~2 g6 B4 e/ {5 l7 p! P" A9 Q
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
* v" p! g* w- W" d, q3 ^9 ?- U4 M$ @3 D& ?# _$ Z
當然這是個假設性問題
4 ^3 F* T6 i5 h但將人數倍大
; M. l/ Q/ o3 K2 T1 W例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個8 I0 g1 u8 w+ C4 L0 C1 B
(情況可以換作其他)
9 e& ^5 ]1 u8 W" M2 h1 e7 b始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...* ~. G  A# k$ ^/ c
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
) E4 A& [* X* `" `3 ?) L如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:; A; }7 f+ {. i
絕情谷既問題...' z( V" l' [+ Q- ?- N
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
' h' G! J: W% K, B* S如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

  f4 q8 X: z: G( n# U殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好) x8 N5 j- z" K6 p) n* u3 m5 ^
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
; P8 S4 B4 Q6 h$ {1 U: A2 c但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
- _3 ]' r# y# B( V' C( E2 H好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢6 j0 Z7 T4 }+ {' ~
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
5 s# G  u; h; t: q: W! D9 A4 T" s; n( i
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
5 |1 ^# b& y7 E0 _不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:; ]9 v1 o  R2 a; @$ y, @  i5 I6 O
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

/ K# t4 Q# m3 {# g% l
# H" J/ C# a) j& H  v& ~haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
' X5 `0 N; v% a3 }) T0 w你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
+ `1 s+ m8 e* g# o
# w; B' b9 `# W0 Xp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
" j2 z2 y4 b1 q# xyes, my reason is helping more; ~8 n: C& Q9 j
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
% b0 [) d; z% C5 G! Bif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
* J( ?! D- h. m( cbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
9 F  H$ ^* v+ g4 r$ U9 ealso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
5 O" d) ^0 m7 Z/ I' Ymay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
+ H: e6 f2 S, D9 qunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
3 Z; [+ M5 J& O) X. o8 ^& M當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
. r* L; Y# B2 g, g! S3 p( f4 `我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~2 {! I# r+ h8 n7 o, }
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
; `; d! S6 I1 C# R* k8 ^1 ~! X" ~即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
1 c6 U0 p8 \0 r3 f! }我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~5 H. b1 G: |0 N" f
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
6 s) c0 t2 I: J我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）