Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
5 P4 b# }) X% \) s0 H8 L4 @& }' \6 h  n/ G3 [0 R
  f9 Y' @  C! X0 m
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

8 `: b+ i! |# o$ t4 ^8 B* X
, K# R0 y1 }4 Y9 y; M0 Y2 ~' m2 ?$ cIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
+ z) Y. A! v* }1 F" p$ F# s+ e0 j& z4 `2 O/ F. k' Y( f

3 B" C1 B! J) P6 q2 W# ^; tIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

7 R% I! E. K# Z9 S. I+ v8 U) g0 B4 {. ]' R
oh really...
+ E* ]9 c7 x( v6 ~  s: Chahhaa, thx a lot^^"
' Q2 s9 \0 S) O5 d1 Hi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題. F9 g# n9 z+ l$ B# y, l
0 h7 T; Y, d7 c) P+ s
當然這是個假設性問題
& `+ R9 e* ~5 N7 O) r但將人數倍大' \5 e) t! o; a% t$ o" [( A
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
1 e5 c: X- D6 D3 e4 ~; \: T(情況可以換作其他): v- I+ ~( Q; W
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...0 {8 C0 I" p- z* d
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...( g' O, P4 R  \' v8 e
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:7 E' k+ g/ d& a: `* {
絕情谷既問題...
- ~1 E: H6 S  R4 t% H; I* i如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢.../ M. \4 m$ p, X1 O& v3 q
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

1 b: F0 d$ w5 F8 S2 l
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好) G, O  Z7 T3 W8 p8 x
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生9 @/ L3 y5 g- K9 J* n/ C
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩8 ^% \, [* s* F/ C% R# P: W( Q
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢$ f6 \8 P# X7 l  Z6 X
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢2 E, b/ l% A7 X: O3 l
# i3 R5 `, A4 E" q
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
' |9 H! w9 d8 [+ R7 g3 m不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
$ P& Y, ?8 X4 w& N4 f其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

; z2 E; A/ t, o. I8 P: {/ a. w* u  n3 v
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣$ A- z& U3 K5 X; I! Y% t
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
! T( d4 ?) q; z  l/ i" s8 j! `! `$ x3 e" Z, r/ Q8 t
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child% ^+ V3 A! R- f8 z4 ~# ^, q- j& |: r9 E
yes, my reason is helping more
1 q; c0 \8 X; H! m; s  t7 Ifor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
, j2 s" d$ O* h; zif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
2 |; T5 v4 l3 Nbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
' O- m3 ^& m9 ^also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
+ d" c- P* ^) d3 Gmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!( o( P" t/ y# J* p" u: A+ Y- B
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~. T4 |8 R+ O2 g( k
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~; Z) g! j$ s) d! S. P; W
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
. E( @6 S. n. h5 j" w; D正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~  ~2 r: \6 s. Y' k1 y4 y
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~" x/ x; ^5 ~! U. D; v" ]2 G
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~8 P9 n2 S. D% i6 V
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~6 V3 d' ?8 H; F/ h
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）