Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
( s, W$ r# j9 a8 K8 r& @( |. i+ ?# h8 X

1 j# N- I- d# ^4 L, X0 a我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

  I2 ^8 l" ^6 S

+ k# o6 w7 m9 BIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:/ a* H9 f6 K2 b4 W" n$ k7 B' R' f

, q. ^/ F6 P+ M# u0 q$ v2 o
) r( h0 j, w, A1 w) R. a* xIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

0 [( P( S. \) r* c! u* o
1 j1 |3 c+ ?+ X2 Z$ h
oh really.../ C4 G/ f1 ?6 w5 {5 i
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"0 w( s: V# _+ V7 A4 h% c
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題* v( j1 n0 ^9 T$ a1 k
% [% k% l% R9 ^9 s# n# I# K6 J
當然這是個假設性問題' _- n( @! ^) `# \7 T3 c
但將人數倍大
  y# Q1 D  S/ D例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
$ S  g* Q% ~/ R+ M% a(情況可以換作其他)
" |2 X. Z7 F& w# N& G7 y' e! g1 i始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
" q0 A3 y) P' L- C+ i4 V如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...! b9 O& u9 Z. {- i$ M* f
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
5 {1 r: J$ J) a* d8 M6 `% T" F絕情谷既問題...
9 i0 S9 P$ C6 m- z# @% R0 |7 t如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
$ e4 p' K) j9 x如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

# I; x' f7 c! \/ @. p殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
: C: p2 j% ^9 C' _- F$ d% F/ }* a於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生% C) f9 G$ [2 k( s  d" k) V
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
$ a. N8 A/ n7 m9 R4 O好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢2 G9 a; U% F( i; S" b) ^
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢! n( s1 }8 R( m+ @9 g

$ _2 B- c$ c6 X7 j我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命0 [& N/ c! w8 P* t" @
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:  T- U: k8 |- J0 f7 i# r9 g
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

# |6 f' u- M& a, i! g
" g8 O6 ]4 ~# p: F* Y
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
* }( ]* J1 B1 Y) l) ~/ d* K  F, x你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....) K! G+ e+ L0 C4 {8 {, k

/ w. p# T( [5 g, ^3 c: Xp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child/ ]/ |0 {9 b  b9 w+ |1 C: X6 b
yes, my reason is helping more8 s2 E2 S5 b/ |! t5 b+ j
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!9 L, c+ P1 ^) X' p" q- d6 {5 J- p0 t+ t
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child- b* h* d; H6 v' ?$ L  [3 v
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
7 @" u: i/ o' h5 X$ y, kalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
( K- `0 [. Y, q5 amay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
9 b, C' L) p2 R! `under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
( V; K* I) N# I4 e6 q' j0 p% F當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~$ t! e- `' I5 M
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
! _( f* d6 c1 u5 i# H/ K0 l正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~: V# L# Q# i5 N" W
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~8 E8 u. V% F  W8 [5 h, Q, j
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~' a7 I0 s8 n6 E; d( k5 }, b
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~2 S. |. X9 r% _5 z7 S
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）