Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
2 C, X* j- }, C
) u8 P% f1 `2 o
$ k/ g. l; f' F/ n7 y% h我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

  u5 J/ y: v& k0 Q, [! v# u; J
' c$ J& f) o7 J- ^In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
6 E) u. X( H% O. S' ]) T5 N/ I
0 l, G& O$ x8 i9 K8 K/ s3 `* l& m$ j# U* p& f& R
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

- m$ i; x2 R* O! O
& D2 D/ J3 `' {4 E
oh really...9 u& j1 n: s( \0 t2 T* E" p
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
  g% y7 }0 M5 ^i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題& r- ]3 U. V1 |( N. X0 \3 a
! B! A8 b1 J1 Z) ]5 l
當然這是個假設性問題
: O- o" B6 W+ s. M& g但將人數倍大7 v- |# `- ^6 e$ |3 b. j
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個: k2 X7 w" d0 \  Y1 W% b
(情況可以換作其他)
, J; W( \0 G& p8 ^( V% t始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...4 s; H2 w4 v, w: v: Y+ k
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
3 i( W% |! j: g+ b6 s5 u如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
  ?% o* c7 c/ v/ e/ J9 F絕情谷既問題...
0 p. ^. P6 z% n5 O5 |如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
3 l6 }+ f. g! G) V" K  A; [如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

1 L, ]7 J) I- j5 Y( n* j& v
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
5 r# }' }; ]" }& I於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
- v& D( ]9 y0 Y; e, t. z但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩* ?3 X, R+ R+ p$ l1 n
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢4 f) s, r6 Z: ^3 K, {0 x
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
: G. Z* b3 M, r% [; e( E1 b4 U1 m
+ \$ v; P0 p* V0 b我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命. Q& W. t# @) `. n$ E
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:' j6 x" U" t) `9 x
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

, t6 @5 v4 `9 O
: s& L( _  u! V, J4 n+ _
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣( p0 K% r3 o( c" z+ Q0 q9 w( _! i6 F4 s3 H
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
# O# ]3 x3 f1 h! F
5 R8 \6 u, b4 O- A& hp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child. m3 `8 e, O, \8 o# G
yes, my reason is helping more- F* x1 }  @+ O5 Y
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!, m2 d1 Q0 x% G7 o6 \' t
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
( F9 W1 h7 s6 b+ o' U5 ]. [because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
) u( \! ~0 L+ o: t$ J$ @1 \also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!& P, D% `& \5 g# r6 T6 C* c, o& ?
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!! h' B6 h# V. ~* [! z' f
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
: P2 D: r9 p; r/ B當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
; B  O, M5 T* m7 K5 |4 h3 B我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~5 C, ?. g3 J# o, _  }( U
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~8 b9 m6 ~0 l; }1 C
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~' _: G9 V6 e! c5 c) N( d8 F1 q. {( Z
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
# F2 _1 i. H7 R: Y( M但如果o係當時o既情況中~~$ c- o5 x, J! H% S: m1 N
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）