Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:% `% ~2 n# _9 L% C# u

% w& [( D* [) A5 a( I% H6 A2 d0 W: @" }$ i4 ~) Q
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

; e- R/ ]: g/ G* m7 h/ X' T  g
( X+ ~. n, r. B: [: C  JIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:( Y1 T) r9 q  q! Z

% t# r, i3 }" i3 W* e; }; q: G9 i; P+ _- R, S0 `# D
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

' k% V6 Z3 f, h7 X6 \1 q" h$ Q2 j* s! \( K
oh really...+ c4 R4 H+ A! `0 |! N
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
. i- P4 ^* `7 y8 v7 d. ?4 n1 @2 Hi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題! `; I% Y# o8 |' R* @

. H6 q1 N. Z! l當然這是個假設性問題
" f4 s6 F5 \  [% i# M但將人數倍大
5 j+ V. A& r( A7 u例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
' p! c7 s; W; s/ T: B(情況可以換作其他)5 I/ _, k% Q. z* l
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...) D5 A% ~" [# V
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
6 M. i; Q  t$ o" x! S如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:* Y5 M, T1 e# X+ R6 Z
絕情谷既問題...
3 n" n; E! S4 A9 r" x& t% z如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
9 A' e' t7 m8 E) E3 k3 b如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

5 `5 x3 T+ J9 v, q殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好/ Z6 n+ K# q. b/ C5 z2 |
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生4 }3 m5 X" N, K' _
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
" m2 M% W0 ?' f4 R3 Y好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢& u* y: C9 J3 H3 _& `- W
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
# R* t0 i4 U! P$ j& v( x9 {& W" i( C7 Y7 M9 c
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命; D1 R, }! T( \2 h- b8 A
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
' F  u  h! f9 t% {0 x其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

# h8 b2 @/ L& D, B$ n) j/ R$ s% ~7 M9 v5 M
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
8 T9 Q. `5 Z+ B" u你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
4 F. q9 ]0 p* Y/ ?
+ F) Z  s8 X, I. a2 g7 t, hp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child8 V; `, g; u/ a8 X
yes, my reason is helping more0 X8 \3 O3 q: {" {& o% C
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!- L9 l" q1 I- O% k! p* Q. ]
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child/ v1 J/ {% \: v9 D! b5 J
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?9 v# w/ J4 Z9 s/ a. L3 c" i
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!. t5 h- y: a% g  X; ^, h3 k1 e4 R* t4 e
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
3 j" b2 A+ ^7 b/ Nunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~! Q/ f' k% v1 y
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~6 z2 C$ M2 X- ^$ ]  R' m+ R
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
8 D* Z2 J. D) y正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
8 P* G6 S# k) Z' F4 i, ]即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~0 {8 Y& G+ f, j6 P0 k
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~+ A- i1 v( M+ S1 r6 a
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
9 m+ y' l2 s5 J4 B' [2 S我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）