Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:+ i8 Q  ~; A* `+ G0 W( F3 H
1 D% `' Y% }5 M9 z2 V' t

" s! N3 |+ a6 Z; Q' _: v我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

; g2 ^1 N8 r  a. f& `
1 ]$ |0 }( W! ~) q4 a0 i6 \  iIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
; h1 w$ s' s9 O* V) e  D9 H. V
) M# c/ x  R+ L+ i8 S1 [; J$ f/ w9 M
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

, p6 u6 B* d# S/ O6 q+ q! v
$ {3 W6 M# b- I1 S; U; ?8 }6 ~oh really...& l" w  e5 Y* o8 {6 Z7 ]- _
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"* P& s) r8 u0 q3 n: w5 v
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
9 P5 A1 _( u! `1 g: D3 p; D) D0 p. K: W: n
當然這是個假設性問題
* S) C: f* z7 m( s9 N# E但將人數倍大
* ]5 h- {, o: Q例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
2 v" H, q: @: f7 ](情況可以換作其他)6 H; |/ _# l( R- g
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
+ a, p& s: V$ R6 N' x9 C. h  T如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
  Z* d1 a$ Q% F! V8 r如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:( w6 e/ d( w- C+ [% F/ I6 Z; J
絕情谷既問題...
6 S5 l1 P6 N3 ]# I如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...8 }7 g% f# c. p& j
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

7 A9 r0 p( `0 U7 d% c
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好0 f5 Z. X3 a" z
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生. H  f; O. r9 H! e/ u
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩9 Y. I  ~4 A  P4 l" S$ z
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢+ U) L1 K+ C+ p3 r; ~& j8 z: O
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
$ R5 ^, u5 s# X# E
) g3 Q2 s5 r) \* f* R我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
  Z9 ?9 C, T, P+ H' a) ?不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:  m' N* d# R3 b# B/ v8 q# w6 i
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

/ R" `, `" b9 X& }4 h; W* j! ^0 H, m# {8 P' j7 Y8 T! Y5 y
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
4 {& O6 x/ g) l% i你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了...., L% h+ R! p9 Z" N( W* P
8 [! G2 K! j1 A8 ]% Q2 Y2 s
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
' P2 H0 E0 S  E+ s, Lyes, my reason is helping more
  [$ m4 x  Z$ E/ }- Ufor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
- r) H9 f  _# h, D% Hif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child6 U+ T" Q% a, ]; T
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?/ s+ G; i6 p% Z  W
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!; g6 Q+ S" A1 x6 b
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
$ B6 A6 U& X' }under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~! M/ T' J1 g) W8 u
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~0 a$ A* e8 `) z" ?" P( P
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~7 R; n9 T9 j7 P5 E
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
7 Q: s5 [* u0 |# X* v6 I即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~1 O) m7 I' s- o. P, q9 u4 ]
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
3 S8 }; U! I2 e6 ?& p) p5 T. g但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
0 l* A; B- V9 K+ Y5 x我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）