Rika

由最好排到最壞0 D7 a1 V) _+ a# l9 a7 e3 @
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong2 ~) f7 X- c" }% x/ F9 X) `
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount# W7 P8 N% J: c8 C5 J6 |* ~8 B' a
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
% f2 |" e) w6 [! |M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure- M# F% s8 Q* M* z
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
5 }; ~" c" Q* M1 e+ l' X% {
9 K  ]. K4 r5 ZM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
* v8 w( q4 T2 Z3 c) _8 K# V$ C5 R3 d( D& O4 P
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
( w; O. s/ l$ p9 b0 l) G% Z% \3 s     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!# l; W; A7 P" p+ [3 X( E
" i) p" P- d+ F1 G0 Q
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做4 I9 F" G  R# |- E/ O% g

: {. {8 g; R  }0 WL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志! f& O9 _* C7 b6 y5 I- `* A5 U
) S& R  B+ i$ H8 ~2 V
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
% J$ ]6 _2 K( Y0 z# x4 e! S     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
, o7 K5 R. C$ Q
8 y  U; n2 ]( p5 J4 \[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
& x  c2 }" m2 y: r9 _: L而家答多次
3 a# n. i. t+ t. _' U0 pf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽& H  c0 S2 e; q. Y# e+ Y
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
6 D% Z9 b5 s/ a* P/ R9 Pb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
$ P% i7 T8 r4 F3 j0 Q; ?  vs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
  O0 {) g/ I2 Y0 ]3 mm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
: x: ]5 E9 W8 U6 f& r$ s- _% X/ o0 V. I. ^- r
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大; m9 e# M4 S' N
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度8 p0 L  k1 I& S$ c4 ^
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
" n  ^/ \8 s( T2 J9 A% LS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢  H. e/ x1 @: f: _( G4 \  X% i
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
$ S# V: c; s; I1 l* m. M6 r3 wF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默", Y* q: B9 T. O: ^. |
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取& X% k/ k" T4 v6 g1 h, n
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法# N; i6 v4 Q8 _4 o+ t, [
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果8 |1 v1 w( b6 P. H2 [# G2 j
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情/ ^; p# Z/ h; S; \$ T( m2 @
8 s2 f4 e" }5 D: g0 y. @* K
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:$ Z' p7 }( |6 Y
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
6 j- J7 `- h! \# JB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
  ?" Z: n2 t% N* x" qS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
$ m7 `% I8 x5 t  o! rF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
5 J  J1 \  x/ X7 XM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

" I' Z' x7 L- b; t. M& F

  e1 g3 y& g5 P- Z# D% G; I same choices with u , but want to add some comments ; @, {5 _7 r* F7 t& s8 u' N8 T
; G0 j. V' X# ]) t
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
6 t) @% @( f5 B5 A9 V
3 e$ Q3 _) A3 H# R5 C% L9 H" rS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
( M: x4 a" o. _; e8 f  \( y* u' l' `- ]: u0 x6 l
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome % F6 @4 ?( o/ q' N9 Q5 q

# i3 s0 e( ]9 ~1 T' `1 tM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
1 t/ g0 R1 K# ^) D
. q$ [1 S2 O; A, }6 l[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge2 Z; d" q: y# d8 Y; _. b2 L' Q
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
' V9 _- I& K! w3 _L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
: q% c# X5 W9 w# J  U& `6 xF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma- a6 p. V- t- \: t: C% d/ }
) U% ~, T3 E8 B& r* N8 O' }
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
; z  V2 v, P' Q# F7 W有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，3 M; f7 H$ u0 {$ C
由最好開始排起既話，# K$ U+ m! \" A& s: y! p; J+ p' |
L B M F S 啦，
! {1 `& _; e1 T: e6 ]4 r2 ~+ h) w4 Z" E
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
* o4 J5 \3 P1 Q. f  h) O但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
( |0 i4 P: `1 l如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？6 X% C$ d. P* \/ m
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
3 d* R# o' f& O4 F: m4 v( [& o0 q% {8 ?, R6 C
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
$ `/ x( X& p0 p( Z& B所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，* A2 z/ A5 r# m( F" d) m
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
. t, Z7 g3 ~- n7 ]( s0 g3 I+ J3 q# p2 j! g% F6 D% h
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，& d/ g& Q8 C9 V* v
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
( A* T; o" |0 j5 x# l9 N/ X亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，1 a, |7 B0 T7 ?' o: T# l% r  y) L- _
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
8 e; E4 T3 z( g$ @- o. z4 e M 都可算壞了。
" x8 G% Y. M; R$ P8 G& i
! b- N5 k- @+ U9 k( d6 q F 呢個人仲掂，
& f( j2 w9 t, P* O" g知道既唔等於要講，
9 s- n9 P+ X4 g# L; X如果呢件事發生係自己身上，% e; H9 S( I( e9 ^( ]; T5 M8 W
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。3 ~# P0 m: g4 [
$ N- `" u7 k  ]9 A" ?: v% F
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
# Q  ]' R2 I: T1 z" N( f. E. j  h3 P始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。1 L1 a3 v! G, S4 F: p% |  r7 _

. I& M# P6 [8 n( ~" |; y
6 z5 V, V  j" B3 w  b  M% D  l/ Q2 Q% g+ _" z2 F4 y
題外話：
& ^; w/ p' p4 h/ O* e唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，; i) w/ |. X' K9 I
睇到 S 呢條友，
2 x0 |' U# S1 b0 B. l3 C9 t0 V我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
6 Z6 @  \5 W4 L# {/ M  ~1 J: Z8 N" i4 m  g- Q8 u
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!5 [3 ^" d' G0 k- k1 |6 y
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
6 j5 {3 ~9 {7 c" e1 ]M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她% i' }( V0 [/ J4 f& {/ E  l
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害( I  h' `8 f) h" `
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...