|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
G2 n& Q9 k, K* {CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
* t: z! B1 }! L g* r, Wmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment." q4 I6 B4 _- k
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
- x9 {% ^" i6 P7 m3 t# a! Tin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
! O1 @' y4 o9 H ^/ w: N& r. L2 Q9 }' ~Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.1 x; E( m0 Q4 _6 n+ W" T
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,' G: \9 n$ ^& a4 u3 z ?
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. " G+ n2 w0 @$ N% Y, p* v
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. 7 J+ ?' f9 q0 s* y
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
w! v% z7 g$ G6 [! {" J
: q0 @% M, d7 p+ ]2 f$ a5 Q ?im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.9 i8 f- O. o7 K' F
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.' A0 H- ?- |- [" F2 {9 o4 e
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,% [. C) X# g! Q7 \9 v4 Z
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
. t2 l( l3 b: EThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
2 R3 J; M2 P% ?+ b* q. N9 d8 rbut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
& L6 d" ]( y) F* y
: d' ~3 a, r+ E0 M; Z+ Y[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|