Rika

由最好排到最壞
8 y. I9 |9 |( ]- Q2 G4 v' HF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong0 Z# [; Q) N1 X
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount/ F9 \+ [! T' D9 L/ @
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her( c8 V3 y& n$ I" q
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
& ~: E& x" w& `0 A2 @& E: uL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:5 @/ ^2 g* G% d) A3 e9 g
! J) R) s- |' [" v  @% H
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人; F0 o1 q/ l+ M
# w- q2 c+ h( o6 k
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)1 J# @: [$ y( F1 h1 l7 n
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!6 o6 Y) y0 \9 u( M% S

# n/ U9 f+ k- k5 `2 ^B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
) Z4 D; ^$ m) r5 o# n3 r$ T0 X( Y' F; I" I
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
2 D/ R% |2 }3 \0 T4 w0 a
' D& ?& p( q5 s2 XF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
) I' |: u' I2 s; f. N& E     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好4 K3 F9 B. Z. N1 x4 U1 d

& g5 u. C: E" E: l5 Q7 ]. P% W( D[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
; n1 l8 @* v  I! \/ F2 B而家答多次
4 D  k1 }6 Z& e6 a: w6 `4 \' Mf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
6 R& P+ c8 g% F2 `+ }% V  Kl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架6 X0 e+ {5 K- G/ k
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
6 {9 w7 C2 [2 c9 Ns: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.2 ]. A4 [* F/ I/ c
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
5 `8 L& v5 C8 K6 {
' {7 _3 {, w" [+ cL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
1 ^5 d+ B% W$ E) O, ~5 D! BF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度4 ^/ c2 P: |  Z. @
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒% P  r. R+ k$ U2 \
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢; J1 A4 e9 ~+ B5 a" ~2 L
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞, E: c( c, f+ Y/ f5 Z  N- {* _$ ^( p
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"8 C+ Z. e) Z& B* }( @
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取9 ~& W- P3 f; E; l1 }
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法- f  x+ B# E# @% Z
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
, L+ |0 w  z- M$ n" FB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
; I9 q6 y1 W+ d# j2 |! W
3 W! O# ?0 b, R8 |/ P) n世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
( S! }$ I. |/ ^4 u# W6 Y3 |3 E* dL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
. ^8 H3 t2 R+ O; n$ d2 iB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
! w8 M+ X5 d( U$ X6 zS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
# q4 u- J% |7 o4 ]F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
9 r, V, V; d' f0 S% N5 ^; c: S1 N: oM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

% u- y5 \; `) i8 M, Q7 Y: `) |1 u/ [+ a2 ^1 V, b% G; r0 G
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
3 X' M8 U2 }! j& [1 Y" z5 M- Q/ C( m% P$ q
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
9 Q% Y* i3 v$ d# J; @- y2 ]5 Z5 D. g, z: [5 \. X
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
; w2 ^4 ^6 N4 h0 @; M& h" v7 W! V9 o! b0 H5 q/ I
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 2 M: i' z0 a. e, V( G7 Y  @5 E# p

5 r4 a, [7 @3 J3 O/ u$ W4 A  DM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
/ n. k. n4 H. M* H, o$ Q, k1 Z# R
- I& L& f2 j9 L4 d; F, p[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge2 E, B! p5 R( G
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
5 _" ?% F! R& k- ]. \0 iL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
; Y  o1 l' S( }; L' VF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
/ z% \* e4 l# A/ O# ?, p, f" L; H- J, w4 @
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....1 Y8 I, y2 M. C7 ?  x
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
2 A0 a7 P! z9 L: u- H$ ^由最好開始排起既話，6 H: P$ y9 \* F; m
L B M F S 啦，/ m  S* R7 Z6 t3 A- e3 T
+ `2 Q, ~; |8 m) C' z) E' g
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，' e$ V5 M' ^0 }' c8 O
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
% R! L# a8 ~4 \1 S% Y如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
" }$ l, C% U6 t; |又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。7 [! m# e7 J3 L7 b; e) C/ Y0 k
4 Z$ p, z- q$ q- Q3 B$ O
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
  P3 q4 O  O4 ]5 \0 O# H0 J& p2 K5 A所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
- _( U2 i. A1 f1 _% M7 A7 S# {明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。4 {4 E1 G! f: F$ N* p! L4 c
- l1 X* I9 _9 X9 e5 z( m* F0 d
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，1 I+ N# j* h  d+ M! t) N; @
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
  O# \' i- V/ G: s" V亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
6 A& @2 \! c8 T知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
0 b+ E  h/ c! y M 都可算壞了。9 _2 N* z7 v0 y0 c

  e5 J3 H& S% k9 p1 Y+ A8 `6 W F 呢個人仲掂，
$ j! i5 E- Z! Y/ ?# {0 k知道既唔等於要講，
8 \  u( c' w2 R: d7 n2 p+ p如果呢件事發生係自己身上，' K" n- o5 h  [8 Y! r
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
$ o& O( S* b3 c" R; ]! N* y- i" K: ]
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，2 Z- N/ F9 Y+ a' U
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
- I: o9 P1 s9 B/ p. \$ w/ n% D  }6 {

. N, N1 |% g. Z' e" I5 ^( b- i0 N" C( x8 ~* z0 E/ W( V
題外話：
' P0 A7 V: M  p7 C1 M) ~$ D唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，, x  h) }" E. H
睇到 S 呢條友，" u# s  a, y8 c
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
) A; d! e) ^7 u
- s9 ?8 T* l: D' [S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
0 b- E# U! |% Y9 i- t1 sF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係: r# w& ?, W3 f( y
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
' ^- o: G9 Q  u8 l/ `0 bB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
( U( ?2 E" C: T2 ~8 IL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...