Rika

由最好排到最壞( i# H* W$ X6 _- r% R0 M
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
9 t) R8 N0 a0 z% yB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
( f( h4 F* D; z8 |S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her" Z1 t. g, X7 [) D
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure& v: c2 I# s) K* u- Q
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
: N! G; P; \5 Q7 a9 a4 e" |$ ~- P
: Y+ a. y+ Q+ P* n6 jM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
" l* t6 K% ^# R# x! o
" G; Q& j- o9 Y0 I# AS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
& O+ i1 U2 @6 ~7 v     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
0 j, f/ I$ l" l! [' V/ C/ A7 i: P+ {7 p! Y% ~( a  F
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
5 T5 C( |4 ?) e! M5 g& c2 g+ W1 h* B
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
3 ]! s) U( L7 R$ t( ]9 z: m/ ?/ `. Y  p: v8 [3 r- F8 T* a
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
) y+ D% j9 `/ H$ s0 ]  L     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
" p! N$ M  N% y+ [
6 w/ e: a  F1 A# ?" ]1 j! J[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案2 q0 D0 S  p0 w) k5 O- F; G
而家答多次2 K$ J! K. `; F4 ?8 C& H7 E4 l
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽9 d3 i2 e8 n  ?8 Z3 x/ H
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
& w9 Q* r4 O) B8 G; A. mb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢5 r4 L( `. f) l! y+ n8 |* k0 j1 o
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.  i! z5 U& ?7 ^  w; g' H" B
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S! A5 M, a% Y1 e  i9 v

- T2 s$ Q, e/ H) d$ kL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
9 h* `# e/ k; [" L+ `! uF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
! H4 j% @8 v2 i( x- J) YM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒9 W/ @5 R0 A& P! b* I8 D$ t
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
9 A# ]5 ?: w$ I3 n9 Z$ e: z) Y: \B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
2 w+ J( h* u0 v$ S' a4 ?$ [. LF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
" E2 e; I3 h$ m) QS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
0 A' {! O0 h4 ]6 N" RM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法  J7 s( S  E2 I
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
5 a; h+ ]+ Z$ {- r0 G( `  A, Z( [B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情* p. A* L# l1 k- j' B. |1 p
% @0 F' I+ \& e+ o2 p; m
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
; i7 U9 v8 i% f0 e* l9 E( H$ hL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己& Y9 \: ?) W3 v0 [2 ]' z
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘& ?* D: @. P5 U  Z1 R2 t' @9 N
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
& G2 t2 W. k+ _/ C& s+ O" UF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
; U, Y4 i# R5 f, P; }M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

5 M& A# e! K1 X. _
& X* ~0 a1 \( h, E same choices with u , but want to add some comments : y& R  p* F* U: z! J$ O4 D
* t  J* B+ l- Q5 W
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  / [: L" f+ }+ v& J( s2 w6 ^) M8 @
; i& Y# ~" b1 E: G; A
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )2 F8 k: k6 r& K0 Y! A8 Q

, U/ ]  z# T/ e0 A  fF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
. v: [) {  J( V+ [7 \5 }! ^
! v2 Q7 b3 x7 R. S5 \. F! U+ ^$ xM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......, g) M+ z; M( f2 W' z2 n/ P/ A" z

7 f7 N- c2 O  v2 W8 |5 Z[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge' N$ c" I. ~: R$ T! C
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
2 c! v' K( u; C5 Y6 zL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
3 i, w  S' ]3 k" t; M2 n1 {F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma0 u" y6 i; z: r" v# t- y7 |
$ k' H' ^7 R; ~5 ~' ?
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....9 T5 \0 G  t! W# w/ y
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
5 o/ T, x6 T5 ?# ?: v由最好開始排起既話，' a2 X* o  ?' h- R3 B: ~3 _" S8 m- h! s
L B M F S 啦，7 j' [8 {( y2 V# R$ O5 \/ q

, ~% m% s$ w/ Z! a/ I6 ~( H: N其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，4 r% W2 `9 p1 C9 v) _
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？- Y+ s$ Y  X: l6 J; H  k  }+ v
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
- i; k: v/ W  z- o% g3 S又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
5 X: e) i& O( Y, Q' }1 H1 D
1 i+ ?2 f3 t" h" y6 H/ y" Z而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
8 i3 y9 i) a- E% ^% g! O8 `所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
: X. r) X% Y0 S, v5 T明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。" z3 N; X1 o7 ^& j9 F7 H5 j9 S
/ d8 z3 r/ t  F
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
$ p) [+ |0 |; ]4 m# e% E, E4 s M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，$ Z: `7 N' @# v* h0 S1 j
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
6 O7 O' f6 `3 @9 c6 |8 o知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
& @4 E9 J4 l  P+ v M 都可算壞了。
' x$ M* \2 b" W) `
( t; s: n3 ?2 a3 t$ }% V F 呢個人仲掂，
! n. l! Q/ j* d7 y* T: n知道既唔等於要講，
6 D' m0 o) ^  g7 G如果呢件事發生係自己身上，; B* t1 j6 j. V  I* R
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。, W9 j; b# |+ k  a* Z( ?
5 }9 k, w4 ^/ _5 Y
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，% B$ r7 @+ ~3 C/ r* a9 H& O0 `" ?
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
  {. x: p" u1 y: }0 l& c" _, g: o% b/ X' _+ K( }9 b% T

: z, W% p& M% }7 d% A. r! _5 j
! R* R! C2 ?9 ~1 T5 f題外話：0 P! n# a) x' w* ], A& V% Q8 p/ T
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
0 h% k) u7 L$ @$ r) B, t8 Y睇到 S 呢條友，/ U! S4 [4 G* Z  P6 M  n5 {: R5 j, N
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
$ Y; T+ \5 V1 _' S0 G& B, u% E$ b
# V6 B' P/ g) ]" I; H' X0 u, nS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!; X  ?3 S# v' ]$ O# H" ^3 b
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係) ?/ B3 \. e3 p9 `
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
4 e# A0 J3 m2 nB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
$ v; N* s5 F; {L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...