Rika

由最好排到最壞3 x5 ?6 T* _- B, w9 f
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong8 Z; {6 I9 n! r/ c  z5 K
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount  [8 b2 a! y" G7 p, k6 n, D; s
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
0 q1 Q8 v6 u$ o  X( V7 W( uM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
: J% f, h' G- FL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
/ l' Q2 p" g1 u9 p2 D. @/ R8 W
8 E+ e3 R/ G8 E( ~2 M( K4 MM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人: \: x( i4 R9 x/ G4 ?" e/ j

- q6 U' y; [4 x) `# \: \5 _S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)3 |& ]9 x( h% ]- @4 b" x
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!8 ?2 s" k' L" m
% e- y2 b. a8 u. p4 _- c
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
1 z+ W6 s% P) |9 E0 c9 _
4 U9 p' `. g: \& h* F* G( H+ HL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
$ b0 j* e8 h8 @/ F3 Q1 K5 S: m( l- `% c" Y! `
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,, K& |# a# V% F/ K1 m
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好9 w% ^. ~% Z. u1 D
) U8 _: i/ c4 p3 C6 Z6 q5 H- Q
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
; L1 U3 U  Q1 e+ r9 `/ Z0 ]而家答多次$ y8 i5 X) o. L; [) {; c
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽5 V) {- ]. |0 U9 S) m: V2 @+ U- ~
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
$ H  ^0 @: j4 y: e: @* Tb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
# y/ Y1 }7 ?! u: [, n1 T9 cs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.0 f9 m6 I# N! v
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
7 C. E/ ^- G8 o# q: K- C
9 E' J. z& n( c& F& E; h% t2 pL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大: D7 h4 \( v4 ?
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
0 H) v- j# f1 ?5 u% ~M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒5 D3 j& z7 R- Z) [! x+ u% r
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢' t. o: A9 ?+ ^4 R' S
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞8 Y0 {, ^4 o* W1 ^9 @
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
9 g, V3 R+ R5 aS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取9 d6 }7 T+ p  P" r( U' m3 c
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
: ?% H) i; ^$ k& WL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
4 m" q# o2 I* K1 J" lB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
  ]. J* Q3 o( ]/ o! i5 ^7 S' C) ~  N- C9 n" z0 {! g
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
! }5 X& z9 [- `7 ?9 _( |6 DL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己" h/ z+ C. D  C* J5 e0 {/ u! F
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
  G  w# U$ X9 z( H; B5 XS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件  S  t( g' U/ n5 e/ E" ]
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方0 m( ~4 Y0 Z& L  p0 c& d: L5 r: _
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

, ?. g5 F, F7 g, v# f7 x
7 N1 Q( G2 A7 E% n+ J4 D) y+ E
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
) y' ?( L: f( ~! v) ~& W+ Y
# n2 ?% P$ k9 rB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
( Y2 B% F4 m! K. t  _/ K$ D8 q
' Y. n- k: Y1 @7 v4 C: ?) h6 DS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
: }# A2 i5 {0 w% L5 G$ P- V3 p0 a3 w1 E# R% R
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
/ O) I5 y2 A5 l( m9 \# L9 y) y$ w$ \1 V: @! ]1 C
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
  Y$ ~, Z2 y' j: H  I  t( i  y1 k5 v- D7 C; o  R' W5 ~7 h
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
/ S; B$ v  @, X+ zM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢+ D' ]: A6 U2 z" w) W1 M
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點& s2 m/ T0 c, B7 ~1 a% {, E# ]4 r
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma, W$ P* u; s& m7 P' K* x; C2 ?

8 f8 `: D4 `, f% J8 p最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
. A# r. I4 ~& ]  b" j5 y/ l有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
+ \& U( Z$ p: Z; Z2 ~; m由最好開始排起既話，
, \( n( X) V. L: J! uL B M F S 啦，% _, t1 @- M( f; x1 P
$ X" B9 }; ^- g5 A, y7 a
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
- j' G: x5 j9 s( u$ Q但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？& G! |' @- T5 H7 n) ~
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
' U4 M" s: g9 L# l  a; K又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。5 j, {9 J. {4 @' n1 W
& v- b3 i% X. V
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，6 k$ _. Y3 p5 X# y
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
% r6 ^( _) S2 v5 h4 [6 ?, C5 h明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。; J3 ^5 \6 s$ c) H8 o9 ~

+ s" K% X: P6 H# y而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，" q4 }6 v+ X! a. s/ B' z4 ~
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，3 r5 G1 Y* U0 L3 R. T
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
( @% u" @2 x7 }5 Y9 u知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
6 M8 E: @+ l6 p( E, x% [ M 都可算壞了。
& D- ]# d; P" A& T2 p! Y- m; E* E3 q4 v
F 呢個人仲掂，
) ~; @0 ?- c, C/ k9 C$ r知道既唔等於要講，: [1 l" v" @3 `
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，0 b5 C1 s  |* E, R1 D% u6 |3 K
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。) @* z, i1 o/ t

. @1 [+ j2 T% s+ O最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
6 F( d7 l& B( s. @* k8 l' k始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。5 \8 L4 B3 L* I* E1 |  {

2 {9 d0 f+ \9 p
$ V+ p6 G" A; p8 p9 R7 i
' B6 `) H& z; Z" O題外話：2 w8 |$ T0 L9 S* S7 S7 r
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，( Y% h: |+ e  ~
睇到 S 呢條友，
; h4 t. O9 ^8 E: `我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L" a8 C6 o2 X9 v

7 Z3 `% [# l, uS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
6 p4 `7 K7 x; Z8 `2 H  oF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係8 Z8 w; \) W' C
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她' E7 G' Z7 a! @: G! a* ^
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害# Y. m; d& @4 }+ {  P3 i5 A
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...