Rika

由最好排到最壞
. H0 x1 _; J+ I3 w5 d; O/ CF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong6 ^! k2 s0 e$ g1 G
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount4 |  p4 T$ H/ H$ }. t4 R4 o
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her! P1 u7 h6 D) t7 U$ w7 \
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure9 Q- L# `  D/ N! }3 ^: p, q
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
) K+ [0 l8 n% R8 a$ x4 \; J
; i& N6 m3 Q; q9 qM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
4 C0 T7 Z, c. A4 e6 `+ T
7 y4 O: y. C5 E4 \S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)% g8 q0 S& D& F
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
0 p$ _. W: E: m9 v( @4 H2 d7 W
% o4 a  ], u: F' C0 ]1 yB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
+ S/ X5 u( y, B& D7 d: S8 _! g8 V: \! K0 _. p: F) j  H
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志9 [7 B9 z4 Z4 B
+ q  P1 v( w4 u) l$ S" L
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,- U+ ^* ^; |- M3 R# a4 E& \
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
% ^6 A8 B7 X  W  O2 a# |) o
: i6 t8 Y! i3 |7 H[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
& s# w" c- V5 J' w, Y% i3 g4 V而家答多次
7 m  p/ |3 m5 _% A  k" d- mf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
4 d4 H1 m, `! k4 c; Bl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架2 W0 u! D2 x# i/ n* r6 u9 f: M9 x
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢/ }% T& ~6 P0 R: }8 L3 Y* d
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.) {+ m8 c( @2 M* ?/ A
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S( ^9 S7 e" s4 z
! m6 z8 W1 W* {7 C5 P8 {
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
. y( ^( `! g# {# fF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度7 b. x' d9 y8 E
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
4 C* i0 m4 D! M  N7 ]S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
- O( }! o  C. F* a3 qB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
1 L" N6 Z" v& l. A  y; m# ?5 YF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"1 ^' }: s* M7 R$ S. ]
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取" P, U/ F- }# ^. A+ ]* z
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法# c) {$ P3 D" B  y3 {5 c
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
0 N; }' M- a4 n' I6 Z3 \) FB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
$ L1 r, D1 g" q2 C4 b7 y' p8 T9 o( X( K! o
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:- }& I: [( g/ n3 b9 ]
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己: _" h6 E, S  h4 m
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
# t7 |; l1 h. a' r& G2 L: l$ ~S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件1 t: ^5 X8 v! N
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方8 C+ s. H( b8 [7 i1 E
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

- @7 q/ \7 V0 q/ B; p9 ~8 S% `9 w
* v: |- Q% X0 R$ a0 c* ?% ` same choices with u , but want to add some comments # B! c3 A4 v, C3 c0 O2 m; R0 ?
" m! H1 X3 \- E- y4 T+ y
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  4 z# P' I% s* g! J% b  a

+ O" F2 z( |6 k, W$ GS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )' P9 x$ @: `+ d/ V( S# L& p
1 H" p+ n5 g1 B
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome   z4 M1 S- B1 D. R3 ?3 v+ {4 |* Z
  d# f! @% Q! {# D; f$ R: `8 x* e
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......9 C5 m9 l( x' l& k+ X

- a/ g6 D  j0 X2 `[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
1 O3 ~) t6 ]# z( A7 r) yM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
3 F4 ^- m3 o, GL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點  B0 Y1 ^0 a( `2 @
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
9 r( S% T7 D; h, m* m* _, i3 t# j/ F$ j" ^5 V3 b) V
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
' [5 i5 @. \# R3 ]0 G% g; X+ h( R有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，# L9 @. `3 Y3 {, {/ ~% `
由最好開始排起既話，
" {$ Y+ ^" u% H% _" s/ o! V9 kL B M F S 啦，/ o1 W! [8 y; [% P+ v& q

( u4 ~. v6 j' G* G+ d5 [其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
; ~6 v/ R# J6 a/ A但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
5 T. v" I1 ?5 b, w# g! M如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
9 ?( P: [3 [" M* B) z& F- n9 [又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。; }1 o6 I: I2 ]4 a
$ P$ H) \/ x0 f0 k3 r) ~
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
& g' ]5 C% q) V0 ~# q所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
% d# p! V( `- j9 T4 W" s& i6 K明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。+ x; }- M2 c- O/ y& _2 M
6 i. t% Q, U5 r- P, s7 k! v
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，8 R: x) f! B/ x" ^( k
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
9 C6 W: h0 F* ]' w5 z8 L+ D亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
9 |# y+ @" ]1 Y. G知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
8 d; I% L' x- b: ?6 c1 D  X M 都可算壞了。. i) r- x( J5 B6 [' P

$ q# c( h' F+ i& l; V) i F 呢個人仲掂，
6 Z( Q" b3 S! j知道既唔等於要講，9 ~/ {/ y" u1 M0 \! N" n
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，) u* i  m. [  Y
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
2 d0 y' o; j4 x9 C) {% ^9 }& F- R3 p8 h0 N7 e& i/ _
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
8 V8 b9 k4 y( }( e* L$ W! Z始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。, w0 [) b2 w' l) Z2 T" t

' x8 E9 w) t' d* F' o* l- q+ p1 P
3 R3 e1 V- L# s2 r  |/ E' `) X
# `$ H# t) _8 T- G題外話：1 C. s. T/ L) h
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，7 q, _: o! d/ I1 |" @
睇到 S 呢條友，: Z! y9 Z. z( X4 L) |- O
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L8 l7 U6 \* F  f( \

' J! Q  O" ?2 G4 h  d: _; LS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!) t. I! N" S2 _% ]% K  e* H2 {# ^* a
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
3 E8 w: G" P& z8 [2 jM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
: s- T0 b0 a$ ]B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害7 m& A1 b7 `2 n, _4 w3 s; A
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...