|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
0 F: n; w4 Y$ @9 {( U- N
9 H; w! ?5 q; P" n3 daccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
- d Y( N$ w9 w& d, T, Z/ j* d$ p
$ c: m' @- u" D _9 B" @3 fIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
' z5 s. g3 ]" }0 z( O$ O: U0 c, Uand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
{9 a% ?! G) p Z! p8 F' U( g3 I# h/ y, L/ Q9 U8 ?* V4 c. k
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險% ~: K1 n3 n" A% p+ P# t7 K
: L' o- n, ?* L. w) D3 w% n0 A
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
! o0 t1 G+ r# Y- o# j2 G9 b& i2 fat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|