|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
& q q7 l, ]) v. {/ |; r" f8 V
9 P o8 ?, u$ [% baccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
" U F. [+ S" a& q( ]1 |" q6 ^$ M q
+ s* ^0 C5 v# k! yIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,. [( F# X) w! N4 L. s% F
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
7 |8 l, ]# r! `" g8 A- I% j* O) e1 }4 O
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
6 P- n% o- y) ], X, \9 X9 E% _' I# y
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, $ J2 e- L9 \! v9 U/ m% F
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|