奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:. [; l0 [" Q2 D1 k7 |, [$ w" V

2 h6 ^1 A# s0 ]agree,  ~# l9 J# B6 ~' w
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
/ U2 q2 i4 x/ |% {$ M- C( r, R/ F但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
' B3 r, Q0 a" `! j8 g  m2 V期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

7 J) H  T$ f+ v+ x- m
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
2 S  l- l" e5 j& F/ L2 C: [已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
) H! J2 r0 u: P" ~6 j1 e  k搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
" B! d. j! x4 VJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:+ l' L% ]; V" H# h
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 0 x6 ~! h$ b# X8 q' D

& `4 b& |4 @: e- D! I8 h係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???  e6 W# Q: s. y* |: o, s$ }
; j5 l& r7 l% Y
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

. \# C& ~9 }3 M, ]+ g' {( F) E6 i; J7 W8 F! R( g' a
絕對支持啦7 n5 T/ b( p( U" \" U. e: j2 y

! d  I2 ^. J3 s7 T, W- K7 r6 v有錯就認,打就企定  r4 ~$ E2 m3 l

+ K; }; V5 v' p& O無錯當然要撐到底
* x# C  x2 V* D. ]* g6 @" r, m+ i+ x
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩2 j5 w$ i, K1 z) g) ?* ~7 p, b
. l) V% ^5 Q3 k' t
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
! f/ v8 I4 H/ b8 e6 O
$ S/ f' B5 }6 ?一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
% z" R$ z1 s" K+ O
! F3 ^4 N: R! e8 h+ D" u我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生! D6 m2 t- N/ W% G7 t6 Y! r& Y

$ F2 V- z2 H2 w- D+ U0 B" X唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?8 M5 s1 W0 E0 H1 z; `( F

7 S: q: a3 x! h% p8 c% a1 ~我唔認為lor
/ ^7 a+ [, l- P# X( O7 v9 Y$ F% t" z( ^
唔係話要整死佢地
  D. v8 G2 H9 z
/ h' Y) Y! E: n: m3 `. M$ ?- e" O而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
1 W& V1 [, r' n- |+ R6 s* L) z1 A9 d8 R
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大) E& Q/ y3 F- w& f0 L$ S
( w2 {3 t; Q: ?) F
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的3 p! O4 u5 h# m

4 h* B: r  ~7 ?5 f- d0 ?唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由  X  z& f9 ]' g
  q3 f/ i3 U& l+ g# ~3 {
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
! b& p) Z4 g- o* E1 ?0 J/ P+ }"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非") ~+ \5 T" \3 C0 n5 F8 n3 R
: e2 x4 A# ^" E% f. f
我們的大學生: t6 ]$ n$ L5 |: A

1 b9 T' o6 y( }, L2 Z4 Z+ d& K3 w7 l; ]7 L7 I

$ k' R' M/ \- \$ O+ S" O6 B
2 Y- @( D& l; ]

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
4 u7 Y; W. e7 b, ~' H9 o8 X3 `6 i" I' k$ F5 U4 d4 j5 q. m9 B2 z

' S2 W" n3 l7 O1 x, l( A有見地 !!!
, C: _; y, x, h: `5 n現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
0 E( K- L  e0 @9 Z! m( v) L. C( U& c8 B3 |7 q7 i% T! y8 c' s* ]
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
8 H4 J; y! P2 O0 {9 `- y, cI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
( w/ @% B1 T7 eI pretty sad that about the University official.0 y; X' r  ?( {+ E
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
' ]6 y0 A4 b' W3 h1 y) U* ^4 E. `0 W  M4 l" ?7 r" Q5 O! L
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:3 a- ^2 ~$ j4 q+ Z3 W* t
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la) g7 t4 T! H% _1 H- Q( |# Y
* P0 y  ^( n1 Q. `+ f
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

* L1 U' G2 N9 W' t6 d+ w6 {. e( _: }2 n* L6 K
兩者有何分別?
7 q6 n/ _! U! S( E2 k中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?