奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
3 D4 ~. A( K" J+ {8 n- @) n7 X$ P; Y
agree,
- S& a, l: }0 Y. l& r" |我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
+ m' C: v5 ~# x# j( n/ I6 X但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,7 x/ ~/ x8 r+ Z/ v9 i2 P
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

% a9 ]2 t/ z+ d6 Q/ R$ L  S/ Q( Yhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html" l1 m0 b9 E; Z: @  S2 o5 a
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
" _; C: f$ h% ^0 K' S+ N* z2 u搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.7 y- ^  N( D& g" ~- R
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:0 ]' k# f- z6 W# q* k
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
4 Z  w2 K& e" C) _  |0 N  W2 v9 }9 C
; {5 v) S3 d% t1 j) W+ {+ p. @係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
% T) C! a, b: }! n0 }8 I5 V! x& o6 k' B8 M
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

/ f/ o% ~/ h0 }  ^: h5 y# p- x+ v: _/ S/ u; K  n
絕對支持啦
4 X6 `" S4 z' k
% M7 e/ @1 o+ J9 _, C( _7 p有錯就認,打就企定
0 N5 V: ^) Y( ?8 ~' m- q4 l
8 c) ?% `# Q/ O3 n無錯當然要撐到底+ W1 U; h3 I% o) y- N, H! j' v
7 K1 ]: j, W/ h  Z- N3 |* ]
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩7 r9 a2 P' }  ]7 {  L' L

+ f/ B# m) q* x* h5 G$ F在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
" U2 Q# a+ S- C( P+ Z3 C9 N, n& D$ K1 F/ S' Z" q
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
7 }6 n% ^0 e9 y, b4 I9 c5 ^1 F
% C% A1 K! _" Q; `我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
" @' z" t# x9 [/ p9 c7 P2 `6 b3 g) B
( \9 {, B: M9 i; T* z唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?) ]! S8 j% |) x

! @' ^7 U2 T' Q1 ^# s5 H我唔認為lor! U6 }3 W) A3 K3 {7 b1 c% [

1 a7 t, V! X  F, T- Z/ |唔係話要整死佢地
6 c) n$ `+ I( W7 x3 b" a. _5 N! w2 \4 n' U
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用1 q2 X* {. p( `7 V  b
5 O+ j- m  d" }$ {9 {& ], F; s( V
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
, i- P/ k6 L5 i# U/ ?/ v* b7 K& v) Z9 G2 M
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
4 K/ W+ n* |! H# {9 {1 Q# H# ]- f
- n0 D5 o2 d/ w) L& E唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由1 k. X* C( R+ ]) s4 P: t4 F2 P, F

8 o) e4 d" V$ g# T# D8 ?大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
- {# E- B7 @8 j/ s4 Q+ Q, {7 Y# _"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
: C2 r9 p& W  Y, O7 r
- o7 |* B% ]: |# t9 [# Q我們的大學生0 Z1 Z5 I  n7 Z0 |+ H
6 u% W$ U+ X6 I
' i' h5 ~; T) |( u5 {8 A( f- ~
- v% B5 l$ Y' Q0 g/ K- f

8 T( `1 R; d& l7 {& K7 Y4 D

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:6 [8 Z; c1 l& y, k# C! B; N) I* a1 s

8 z0 y* V. U5 W( I/ i1 W6 ~+ E- R. S. h+ G# c$ H+ ?0 i
有見地 !!!9 K, U9 ~  b1 P
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html" |& S9 ?: C4 f, G  z" E* ~
& d; T8 W$ R3 u' d+ b* L7 o9 T
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 8 l9 d) H7 O3 L5 }9 n7 o
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 4 q. y9 P6 v* K9 q+ w* _
I pretty sad that about the University official.
0 ~! f; s: D: S& \4 x$ SIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
* a" Y. }) X0 r0 @
9 q6 i* d! q) d; b# E: ][ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:/ F! M" L0 F- ]& _9 g; l' n( m2 D
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
7 `5 W; \1 p, A0 L- @4 J7 F
9 I4 F5 ]( y2 W3 G# h[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

& Z+ x. M+ E0 Y! @. F5 U
7 ]& z. M' {, A& H兩者有何分別?- z6 T6 Q1 S" D; y0 b4 _2 N
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?