奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
7 J. y* g) T$ `
( g) \) N$ b8 a* ~* F5 bagree,/ T9 [' c2 `; V
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
2 c; @& o: A7 l5 T9 e, A但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
' h- b8 r+ C) ^% q* ?" Q9 u* [) t4 j期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

- l8 u6 t9 F% _) ~- i% xhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html* L& ^/ ~; _* _8 d' k1 Z* b
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地6 T/ |" Y, W) L% A
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.8 }0 v/ g3 ^7 S+ T9 `
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:+ z+ B4 Y  }9 A; O3 f
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ * G! g1 i/ v5 q! R9 ~! x
9 H0 Q  I) I2 i* d5 O: L
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
; N; Y4 T( M: L& {7 R# k
( V; r* m) U" r! h. c/ n為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

+ L  g9 A- c+ j. H" Z. g" g! U" i3 T. h2 e) [6 e" y7 U
絕對支持啦
$ Y. C1 o- x7 i# D8 A' R! p8 {$ J( t. r5 S
有錯就認,打就企定
$ [# z8 b# [! C6 ~: S7 a4 x3 R1 _3 e2 M, d4 I* k" y
無錯當然要撐到底
( L2 ~& U) f! q7 U$ |7 r& p  f9 c* p( q- {8 l0 ^- ?
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩- I3 Z" y% L4 Z9 Y: k. A" x
" J  n3 n+ Z, P; I/ w! ^, E/ H
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
- \+ S/ c1 i; G3 L! c" o* n% \0 ^9 S& w! n
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力/ N/ Q& f4 B5 |6 i. ?% i. K
# |' i/ s2 q; A, P- w% N& B. o
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
3 Z+ J3 I. ~( U! _
: r8 D: j6 b: H+ @唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?/ U" ]7 M' {' I' ~, `4 {

8 y  s5 U0 D2 c2 x我唔認為lor1 B" V; L) _4 r# j1 Q; n/ t
  U- T' a1 K8 Q# E: t/ _, e  m
唔係話要整死佢地
7 u6 b5 q9 D7 d: L* a5 K% ]& B  G4 m8 O) m
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
2 l: \0 w* k# E, s
/ E4 |4 n2 C# m9 b! A0 Z我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大- n, D* G0 N9 P7 P" x

: j# U: f4 }8 e2 R有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的1 l- N! g6 {/ e2 X( P. J  w

4 e# y2 }$ K, Y; h$ b. f. h唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
) z) u+ E; R# C. j. K  F7 [7 ?* q; B) m" Q8 ]
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
: q1 q3 q- @& N* ]' X9 m) v7 c"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"8 ]; ~+ ^$ w( H- `( }
9 l9 p/ }3 E- t
我們的大學生
# n6 Q1 k2 F/ q: W+ _  f5 F
0 z+ ^: c4 T# Y! n* \! {' l3 S8 @5 u; K

4 T1 V7 \: \. E7 G2 V  j7 ]% m; ~5 @/ p) o: y

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:0 i: _9 l* H; Z; C8 r

1 V" T  o- J) Q" s" k1 g% W
0 i* j7 l8 O7 ~" ^" @% C% v有見地 !!!  H" ^4 w1 f) G) {1 i- Q
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
' X# ]. L. p2 d' h- s2 e# L) C6 \* }2 E! k7 K. i$ ~+ s& [
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 5 f; `, s9 C8 n9 V
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 7 u, O7 D( D: L: R1 ~
I pretty sad that about the University official.- n0 f% \+ @$ x6 @- ~
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
% w7 _% {8 b) R6 F+ v
/ l0 b/ O# Z1 R( F- d: m[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
1 t  p( ?  f3 c, s; L) V我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
1 f* }! r+ j  m( f; A# Q( u. t: J* N9 q6 h4 T* B- a
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

* K$ w: t! q- K: a6 W  Z7 M% I. I& [: ^0 F& s2 Y" Q
兩者有何分別?
% o1 `( z5 e7 I中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?