奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
5 O3 V) R) K, ]9 E+ Y. W8 t! @+ X$ x/ s7 [- v7 ^  D- k7 O
agree,' k, T! ?/ _9 n2 n  W. O
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,# |! S" E) U$ Z
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
/ Y! Z: A  {) x7 e期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

: u6 F+ k% a' @* x' Q; I. {
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
: F; Y8 c7 _+ }& t  I9 S) v已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
+ ?- ~7 B' Q) P7 V2 v搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media./ W% S) B- O, Y
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:5 {0 l" I& Q" M# G& E9 C0 `2 P
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
' _8 @: h1 d$ H' Z( A! [, W* i( @) x* J) g
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???* |& F6 r/ H2 x0 P& R5 y) e

% }9 l9 b* X8 m0 f為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

) ^4 L! y- k  U  L( i8 _3 k! G# o" G% I: \& ?: V& J
絕對支持啦
2 ~& Y; l, C) r5 I, [& y
2 d/ g4 s# Z- ], I- B- l有錯就認,打就企定# G* L2 r; |$ }# K7 J+ s7 v
2 x' E5 t* S' j* {8 ?
無錯當然要撐到底5 X/ u: p# B7 u8 }) [
9 C& H6 Y! h( f4 P3 q8 W
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩' b) p8 b4 Z3 N% R& q6 `

: ~" s, L- b% k; A在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得& |9 r2 F" z/ [$ F* w
2 {# D' h' v* v6 ]  }9 y/ H& o
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力3 F' k; l' f9 z* e: f  T' o- g
4 }# d( l( t$ {. |! ^) U/ C$ u
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生9 b1 C0 R& R9 E, o, |% a( Z" k0 o5 [4 [
1 w: \& t5 e* E. t* @, I" D
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
! C+ h, Q1 q4 Q2 @5 F& k& K1 Q9 }8 h4 [8 F6 t3 z
我唔認為lor
% {  z, I8 Y# }* q2 P% ?' F, `! K. d3 s; i
唔係話要整死佢地
+ r$ u; E' u+ J/ r" w8 A) E/ f& _2 F) c! F
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用( ]; A/ c& J4 e1 i# I
2 }5 |& Z. H' f6 u1 x
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大3 H+ f( ~! X7 l' Y

9 A! D0 h3 {: l! m& e有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
/ g! V6 x5 J- Q+ R2 G
5 z7 w4 T6 l! ]9 K7 G7 p- V唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
( @3 U" D: m2 x& D: I1 U! K3 M2 w/ ^5 C4 Y2 w! F5 ?* W3 M: n
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句: }0 ^3 y! T- i
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
& I" O* ^# Q& _- G5 t: h$ u1 ]2 f
我們的大學生( x' w9 O) \' ]8 H3 S
  A* p& Z' G6 A2 _2 i/ N! S
/ z' e# e% G7 o$ b
& b' _: D6 o8 \& O
( O7 f) N0 L; A* m

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
3 A+ Q# k) c' G' A9 p6 D
- ]6 t3 Q- _: t9 e" ?! X2 T8 r2 I1 W+ K8 |0 \
有見地 !!!& Y0 o; q3 R$ E2 l# x5 I- ]7 W) P
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
6 t. Z8 N  d9 F: N
) f$ K. G4 ?- \4 m" H3 {3 RI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
- v: B6 H! ^4 ^# {# S8 s) vI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
7 [6 h3 q* V, QI pretty sad that about the University official.
) _: m9 b2 g" m; o: L+ A6 EIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la5 L9 P) ~/ M& |) z2 b7 v, _- `

. b+ r/ W0 v. H8 M[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:9 ~* \; w: h: k9 M' u
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
  w4 w2 K8 s( d  f7 ?  C* C
' ]5 _. c$ L7 _! l[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

# u1 }( ], u. r. V" V$ N7 j) N  n+ |3 ?- L: |" a
兩者有何分別?+ }0 r7 i) `; \5 m. I
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?