奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
1 e( X* U/ k& S  L" I$ F
% _* A" `* x  W3 C6 }3 Y4 l2 zagree,
6 c, M; Z) T+ s1 M4 Y* f我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
( r  j% Y2 j2 _' a" ^2 h但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,% T+ ~6 |/ E8 [; U  `* N2 w
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

0 A; [6 \& n- Q
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html9 I5 |9 p. w  ^2 {. P
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地$ K+ l$ C; I0 u) b' k8 v
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.0 E- y( D% ?; W1 B- ]
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
1 `8 q6 N, G" i有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ ) _8 S( c; I. H, Z
+ I9 I" l" v& W* O5 s2 L1 x$ o' B
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???. E: b2 L+ p6 T% B( V4 F: P

2 J  G+ v/ ]3 m% d, _% G+ N為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

) ]- P/ f& ]3 Q/ Q8 ?

; t+ E+ M4 o2 M7 f絕對支持啦
# Y$ O/ s! G" |" p0 e! K( R
- _2 L. ]) P& F+ k' [" E有錯就認,打就企定
- @8 }* ]# u( Q, g' z
* d$ ]# ~# l0 M# }# I8 U) n5 [. |無錯當然要撐到底4 u+ a3 N* l. _* a8 U" i

9 C: O- ~" }0 n5 t% s8 I但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩  k( @. H' }$ b
1 L& o5 P* x6 D- F6 |3 O; G: h- ~
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
# d5 [* V5 w4 l1 t9 K" y
' T7 Z  o( C+ K* I# o5 R( n. F4 x一份公眾讀物係好有影響力6 x" A' G! M* I2 e6 U& [

4 U  y0 t( E- h我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生. D! v  i8 B1 p7 Y6 M

% Q6 w- d7 ?5 l6 [唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?$ G1 o$ w7 k% T! N+ D$ b( E) X

7 q& T# @8 Q+ n% L  Y4 N+ p; j我唔認為lor- s6 h" I- Z1 k8 ?
5 ~0 [& B6 M+ B4 F' C# @' ~3 u! q
唔係話要整死佢地
4 Q% O7 I- C& f7 [1 N* Z; f, I: U, @
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用" h% S- M  z. D; K: p7 J: K

. H. I1 l3 M6 S3 F- [' j+ \我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
* d: T5 m4 k2 ?& ~
+ _0 z% X8 J$ ]9 n+ V0 a有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
5 |* e  ]* D6 Y- E0 e+ M3 M0 B/ o8 ~. y' }& S" n' `+ o* [
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由. X2 A) u' l& e6 r5 H% h: g$ M

' }; q& Z6 K; u# F2 h2 i大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
2 b( X: L# `" M, ?"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"9 c5 M# M  T: t- k: ^3 n

1 `- }- _+ P* c9 o8 Q我們的大學生0 Y# X& V1 d' m' P
; Z3 G! G, l2 I: L' J* |) V
4 v- K5 w0 L, p1 Y6 E
( H+ k7 `2 f) R# U7 Z5 @. o: u

: ]- T6 O8 U1 ^1 o( X  }

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
, d3 ^0 U, Y2 I. d9 y' f' y$ g  P. ^1 ~

" }: R' W1 x7 ~- v( u有見地 !!!2 |* ?" T' W# O8 y
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
* I$ v7 q1 j; v4 H% U5 i5 S! }) _* n9 c
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 1 g$ Q7 d1 b6 ?' V" [
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 2 Z( W" k" l2 c8 \
I pretty sad that about the University official.
2 U! _  R2 v' oIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la5 m; t$ i/ Z* L" J( s. U
2 x, d+ o; \- Y' l2 f
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
6 }4 c# X6 K: X0 |3 t) X4 @1 a( K我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la& g. d! N; B0 r0 w+ }

* L$ D4 m5 t2 _; s3 T[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

8 Y5 ^  `6 L" X! M% h

# G& l, i' q/ x3 }  V9 A兩者有何分別?; T% K* V1 l8 S2 j* T/ `) o
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?