奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:9 g. D- g( I( K& U" e
) y4 W# t: ?- H7 W" a/ \5 J
agree,+ s  ^: z! L1 S8 ?+ x/ u* }
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
. t5 O3 D& P( \" e# l/ A; E' N但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,; l' j) R5 T% i
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

" J! f) ^) v2 E/ e: k0 C
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html' y; @1 m. P$ t8 A/ P1 y
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
) T9 Q, P( J8 L  n4 Y% `' z搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
% k" [0 R: M; P1 }. TJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
) J4 v4 o. v7 M# ?  M4 M3 q# U% s有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ . s; Z2 S- l0 g: z

$ u8 U, I0 d" w6 \/ Y4 q係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???' J1 R' H7 _7 Q& e

  K0 f" a7 m; g1 b+ K$ F! {為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

4 P: ]1 y$ A) H
+ _; d( H% \7 H+ k6 g2 `: T# ]2 a7 Y+ X絕對支持啦: B% r; W- w* c5 B

6 X& S. T6 R+ U& Y0 @7 R# ~" b有錯就認,打就企定
" S1 [2 ]  f! R5 @4 d$ X
1 `& M% K/ ?0 B! H9 w" j5 z$ q! v5 l無錯當然要撐到底
" C1 F: I7 I' g- }9 c
& s8 C* s! A+ m但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩6 _. s& y0 B! b( U  d
* Z9 O/ T. l/ a. b* U. o- x
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
' J$ I: y* P, N
& Z$ b8 {( f  w% N6 L! T8 ^, [1 K一份公眾讀物係好有影響力7 k, j' Q2 s. R2 d  |
' |! a4 q7 J* B* r% \( h
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生! E, T) y4 k) h" Z/ V) l" t  V$ Y( }
' g- T; w$ Y0 r3 U: o4 b3 S$ d
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
6 t: l9 G+ D. A7 l+ c3 \+ Q6 y( U( A7 Q' L5 A1 S1 X
我唔認為lor
8 n( _" u& j- a- s* m/ j+ w
: F& f) H* C( o7 K, I' O唔係話要整死佢地
9 a/ j$ q9 x' ?
7 n) R% \, Y- d  |: _* Q而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用- B8 I6 Y9 H' w( s

+ o; }% g2 y) w: \) e+ t3 v5 w我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大. Z8 M$ k% A( N" Z" y1 Z: h5 g( D& [2 C

' w% Q' Y% l5 M  p有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
9 F- z8 r/ N# q: ?7 ~% x* u$ Z+ i: Z* p" i, |
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
* j/ e+ q7 x( G" }/ |
# a" V5 V7 T- _8 d' ]" |( J大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
" w# J1 I  h7 I, ?+ E"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"  E% l5 z+ p4 h
1 f6 B& r# _3 @+ K0 ^6 R  }
我們的大學生7 P' U6 [- s" j

: p" k, j; Q' ^6 G( l
% w1 q2 o5 O' ?# m0 ~; J# p8 _
# T6 Q- |7 \# L
1 c4 v% b# z+ M# ~0 z3 G

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
; u% K' [, t" W+ R9 G. H! p& {8 t5 k% i# ^/ B$ l

% {1 K- ~. y. r  `1 o有見地 !!!
1 A6 z# m6 w( ^" U) f( M5 s現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html- I5 D/ [7 O' M* r9 d3 T  P
0 m2 n' ], ]' a7 M, d+ U7 r
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
9 U. v5 F9 }! jI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
6 f% a9 K, m; LI pretty sad that about the University official.: ^2 v8 b; \% G  a- C% c
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
0 ~6 T1 k. U- j2 N; W+ i
! J' U, w6 ], T  U+ ^0 E0 [[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:9 Y9 D2 a* ~! n
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
* M9 g) B8 R9 |! l3 w- ?4 e% Z% d- r7 h; v4 H' y* K# u+ L& o
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

% v; G/ `; H, v0 K8 u/ L
# I9 ~' J6 z6 `- \& t
兩者有何分別?/ n) w) F3 m/ z$ Y: l
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?