奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
. ]0 U0 S6 b/ v. q$ b4 R: \- W$ o9 `5 |( n! b, w0 D
agree,
5 m! t' w' k4 y! R# y我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,9 t) i" [8 y' |
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
" ^; Y) I/ m/ J0 h期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

) r/ K- k  q# s
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html3 Q1 i+ q6 F5 h* f) [1 D* I
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
! x. B8 {) M3 [搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
+ f% C: |$ z6 ?( W  q9 t* R+ ZJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
5 ?" @. O7 E# i1 X) L有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 3 `3 C( x! ^) G

  L. S6 v' ^0 L) O& L' R/ @5 n% l1 J係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
' J/ ]: i# l- B# K; f
- E5 s$ [: b$ v1 L2 i- l2 o為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

, I2 _& F- T+ c7 l2 A

) `& V$ l: l, s% o4 v絕對支持啦
/ ]+ ]5 O. ^+ ]6 Z2 W& m# m, Q- t" h" T5 k. w0 X
有錯就認,打就企定( J* C4 p" {7 x& e
  ^0 `0 n5 B0 H# P( z! F, f# ^
無錯當然要撐到底- A! M1 n" q/ W! ~! p- K$ x( N
- w8 [% [8 B3 ~3 M, Z* [
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩, J1 O8 o7 L# F" ^
, l/ e4 E4 B8 |9 l) B/ i4 r8 v( x
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得; l0 }$ \! C1 o) o# _" I

  N7 b8 x6 C( B% |2 g一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
4 `- Y2 Q3 f$ [) k
: Z1 d$ u3 w. u% }5 c, y( w我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
) I/ G3 U. Z) H! U: C
5 G* o( `! T/ F/ o: j5 U" T% |4 k唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
8 j1 B2 O+ I, h3 ^+ Z6 l( Q, L) l9 C* D4 W; J. |# I
我唔認為lor
% O8 b: d+ W0 r& u/ S# Z7 q
6 B) H5 z; r. r* N9 Y" W唔係話要整死佢地$ `8 j8 p+ X# \/ P
( H4 a5 |* ~, F" E0 U
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用2 `+ ?, |- v% R+ D# a9 y9 s( N
0 t3 r& p/ j" N! V
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
& i8 M* G8 {& }! r, M
7 W, O( Q! q/ M有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
9 i6 S4 S% @! u" f
; s: H8 Y! t: o! w! D7 `唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
, q  \& _# D+ t- w* `: \6 m9 O
8 V- X$ v! ~) @, E( r大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句: t7 k" [' p4 V% R9 ^7 _4 R
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
) x( H! ?1 p% }/ A+ n& S$ e# q9 X$ ^; `* z0 \; y$ P9 W4 k
我們的大學生
( R) J$ N; z. u# t! ?" L$ K
- X' Z9 U% R2 J
. k7 t  j8 W* Z3 J$ e6 m+ _6 I# |8 S
6 l/ `. j1 R' \( X

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
' a- A" M2 X- y5 u5 t5 h; X; g& N; J6 b* d9 R6 \, |
5 r# ?5 v0 u! k: b  r
有見地 !!!8 j  Z/ ^' v3 x5 @  a
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
& Q6 a# t- h, M) c1 p5 W- y
! r4 D! A7 S  LI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
* z+ m# D; l( p- ]2 R$ z% `* OI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
4 l) M$ _" S8 i9 iI pretty sad that about the University official.
, }% j7 U# E$ G6 CIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la6 W- I7 J1 Y# W

6 D8 D4 c, d0 C[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:' \& b% u0 M. f
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la+ L% a; ^6 v/ w3 y) K5 C! @
! O0 _5 \8 T3 o- G/ {" |; T
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

  t( v  ]0 {+ d0 }9 ~3 @
; G: e* U, F. s" i
兩者有何分別?9 _/ a. d) o7 f+ `
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?