|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
% x u$ r( L: C( C0 I) P) V U, l; L
* z2 H+ @# S. c4 t9 N同意.* G J( Y3 _7 {, { i
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... 8 M$ `* Y' F; b% w R( f
. l) A- C3 p+ t" NI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
$ Y" P" N: j w2 E/ HYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students1 x7 F" u0 @5 W
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.# L& r* r; e$ Z" H! k( o
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.0 d9 z% ]/ y3 i4 y! X
# f/ O. D( c: w1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law" \( [) t: b1 [
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
1 A: J; L" G3 [9 i( g: e( B3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
, {6 S8 i$ Q. R, G" h0 E$ H% [
$ x& k0 Y# H) x; \/ c2 UThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|