奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
7 o' r0 t7 P( ?$ d7 w
( A* z% T, q+ x6 vagree,
! Z9 g4 y2 [0 E4 ~3 b' ~我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,/ E) ]3 U: f1 G
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,! n" @8 w: G  G) s" N3 @
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

+ f' s0 m7 [. c  A) O6 m% b. Lhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
& o. J( T" }$ s/ L/ c* W已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
- ^' K' Y$ L5 a搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media." b% l+ o; X. I2 I
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:! c/ g# {/ G% e3 v
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
9 h3 G3 B4 \7 A1 L! X8 }
' Z' t  y0 ]$ x' }+ C4 a係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???& d& |7 \& n( ]4 r& ?, _4 C
' D+ f" X1 _# S
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

1 M0 F5 `; K* s! A8 y# p) U) n; Z( K1 r9 k5 ?/ c) v
絕對支持啦* J( N' S' O( \* ~4 K6 |) [

8 h% \' U. e0 j6 g; R( i5 P有錯就認,打就企定8 H+ E! J% `9 o2 D, D
: F1 ]/ l9 t. z0 @7 U  F0 f
無錯當然要撐到底: Y0 Q2 B) b0 z* ^4 _! [2 l# e4 v

$ ~8 q( V: x' X2 r8 ]! j但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩- s% V0 n2 K5 ?6 W1 C9 c  y% R

  W$ m$ }+ }8 z在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得/ F+ K( \& H, f4 ^9 o" C; t

) C3 j( T& B4 a+ I" p' d6 c( T1 Y' U一份公眾讀物係好有影響力3 F* F  A& N! b# Z+ z( p

4 w; {9 r3 ]. S我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生5 V8 @% m" L* U4 S9 k) Y5 a* D

! p% T6 q+ k2 I; h唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?) P3 {4 f  u* X7 c! i6 J5 B

2 r7 T+ `8 }1 ]: X, P- _& `# S4 y我唔認為lor- v& ?! J5 s) c% k6 D

) f0 \5 k( b4 T9 I唔係話要整死佢地; t: u3 l6 }& f/ d4 G2 j
/ [+ v5 t; r7 K6 R$ J, m
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
  A$ P1 q9 T6 I4 x& E/ ~" h3 A3 Q* h* I& h5 J3 S
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大* v+ ^, m5 M' n' @- |+ @& Q1 a' r

! a( ]: _$ N2 X有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的; f4 r2 Y0 G9 _  F, r- _( I& j' {8 J
& g& H: u/ d; d& n2 ~9 R  h7 w
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由4 a/ H- O5 a2 b  ?

9 t' ~! q2 U' c& o大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句& K$ F  k8 B& X
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"+ z( x- g6 ~  I$ _4 f

6 }' P/ z& Y& F) {6 d" h6 {我們的大學生  I" D( T- ^& t+ e, j
+ o3 E+ ]2 |4 I: H0 S
( @3 H" ?7 F, r2 T; ?) \; C5 f

) x7 S. V# N$ T- w2 P1 q' C2 Z8 T' a; |& P; y  y3 U5 z

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:" {% H- h6 Q0 q% U

4 q; W, ]: a7 `( F$ b8 \& g, |' G; U
有見地 !!!
6 o' \6 \) M  P6 v; b2 a) P現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html& n) s" z! k' U5 z. A

# a/ q) C7 D+ Q' }I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ! N+ u' A, S1 m0 Q8 L2 S
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
* g2 [: U6 u0 d' I% pI pretty sad that about the University official.
$ {+ y; i3 n/ b: v: m# l" v' ]2 `It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
$ y9 j& s/ k: b" `: M. J9 h# k0 D& H2 b
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
, _8 f$ W" q& B) i# n4 K: J/ l我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la) H$ @4 D( c( b1 t

: U- G( `& ~! W# _[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

; P# T. B# V' S# i
1 z" d$ p+ e5 P' D2 H2 g兩者有何分別?2 i. K! J  o( q/ J9 w# U2 Q0 Q" J
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?