奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:3 M# \+ H4 G1 H) M0 P

" ?* x4 |2 c" a7 wagree,
0 E; m( l8 R: N( N5 v( e9 b( J; n& R我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,3 j' L& o: R* h: n7 W+ Q- o
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
8 {) S: `- s- R( E* b期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

! @0 j  [7 b' u
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html5 P( {/ @2 h& ?) V
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
2 S  o% s3 w  i0 B2 j9 @* S( x搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.7 {: W! S0 c" k, n0 T$ y8 i  C
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
" Z! _( n; I7 D& r8 \3 t有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
: E, `* W5 w4 y5 g/ ~# \5 ~
4 U# Q9 M; ~. o1 D  g3 Z$ V係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
+ K% Y- ~( V( X
4 T' N# \; Q! b為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

1 q% {; }6 X5 p$ M8 O
) B" w  s7 [; X  t5 Y' W% l+ [8 s& M
絕對支持啦6 h+ F0 W; |8 C6 a
# B2 W1 \" r7 y& d5 E
有錯就認,打就企定9 I0 Y8 q; K' M# k

5 z: u- z& I: D& L2 C0 y- C無錯當然要撐到底
* ^  x+ U! ?* E3 d& B. |% q! t( z0 P' ~0 d+ T9 K
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩7 P4 `1 W5 K, t! V( |, {1 n

* j( _# N; B, P/ A# I在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
) e6 @/ l0 c& ~5 |  c
0 M3 {: [0 x( K) U" @; D+ ^; V. ^一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
' z4 |( x# K" n( A7 o) |  U# C; |% r9 z4 z/ D  B" _! c$ U
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生7 F/ ~) G; i. h: k0 N

: U: f+ b+ K$ w唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?0 \" F+ s2 y: ~& ^/ w) z) U. i5 w
# _+ E* d& l' S% m; C& m
我唔認為lor6 ?5 g/ N& t9 M9 R
4 u" R  B3 y0 c# j
唔係話要整死佢地' k0 F) i4 c" U
, z5 Y2 P' ^. p# G5 k$ H
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用* ]( D( U% j5 L* l

' B, z) \, L  u( a7 D; ^我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
' ?- k' O' K: ~. z+ L: x3 @, S- S5 b+ @; C; @) b- p
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的; o% g% {! u7 \- o3 E) a. Y

8 P% P; D: G7 m$ x" H; S- |唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由" r* \% b: ~8 O! D% |- F% R1 b
# B2 ^& @1 X$ X& ^1 n
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句" }/ O6 x* l* n2 ]4 ?- B
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"! y. Y3 W- U/ d5 w
6 [# r. T, a" D# D  c5 o: g- E
我們的大學生7 v8 \$ X4 N5 i. `  [

3 I, ~2 k' S7 i9 ^; ~4 E) x) B# z8 |: |- O  e

( |6 Q2 @3 ]6 ?/ Q$ Q+ p' D  L( z, m5 G9 C, _

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
* K6 [6 _: J0 E5 L
7 r$ V* `/ g/ D' G4 X5 Z# j
7 x, f  ~% }( c/ I* m有見地 !!!
5 r, X0 {2 q. \2 K& F現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html. u2 H) L3 Z9 n
/ R+ M3 h3 W7 m) S5 ?
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 9 ^& t) o7 e% O/ I; i/ R9 i
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
& w6 c$ v9 Q+ I$ r. G7 n  XI pretty sad that about the University official.3 Q0 b4 d7 u. C# @, @  K9 G; \
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
9 U) E$ @( [8 A/ F
( n: D* q  W" I- o( {& D9 k) a[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:3 M4 v# \  l& m0 p; A
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la: K; m" B6 Z& }' }0 M6 W1 a+ h
$ n5 J. F/ X2 _6 \' j& x
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

! b) U6 N! T8 ~3 p- ^4 O
7 J; a2 G8 q- O5 d
兩者有何分別?
' K# j; u6 P! |中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?