奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
/ P7 w9 n5 q" H$ v
- D3 v5 B1 R5 O% v4 }2 `: Wagree,  q3 U# p8 S* Q# R
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,! {6 q. ?9 W/ J# M
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,8 X( B( T( C5 z' p
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

' w% ^6 R$ D! t9 v& G5 ]( z
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
0 a0 Y3 l4 c' M" D已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
* }( |6 i8 b- Z" K9 E8 `搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
7 P6 G3 t) Z  J' j, WJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
( D! u0 X6 n! H# |0 H6 c* }/ k9 J有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 6 ~; M. E" @2 W' W; e

2 s" {( `  F9 a# o% x. I係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
5 ?2 K" J  \0 ]' q! b7 d9 q& X# y1 s/ y! D+ _9 t& \  d) R
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

. A% N& X$ e! l1 z9 h
& |9 w4 N- m; o8 Q! Y
絕對支持啦
1 `/ B5 z/ R. \7 c( f% Z, G/ n/ ^* L
有錯就認,打就企定
% t( a! c* a. R3 c* H$ }* V* w4 J8 C% ?/ L! P+ c4 M% e
無錯當然要撐到底
: @3 j1 D. U1 ]( K+ e& |+ n/ e$ i: n* ?5 f
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
* g& y  d& n. `! P3 e8 e6 t( _) |, a0 S/ {: m) w
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
+ Q" ]# B, b, \4 w8 o8 y' [5 B6 L% D, v8 N2 N+ o) ?
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
+ f6 N$ |0 V) d: m
3 U' a  I) M8 J1 h5 ~: C我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
8 d8 h+ o( B+ _6 B" S' F3 h# s) w; K1 z3 M: m
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?# D$ y( _6 o3 D1 ~7 ~: R- _! w

- {( I7 d2 P- a' F8 @: q我唔認為lor
9 t* _3 P0 T5 n- Z, Z0 y0 [6 b/ b2 B
. z1 @, h6 E4 `# ^! ^: U唔係話要整死佢地! ^8 n, ^. p. ~9 Y5 Q& o1 @
5 _8 D, g( r4 C- H( U  K3 B
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用, S) m, h4 e: g6 f5 o
8 x: Z2 T) a/ K; [, N
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
, I6 ~, V1 ~; `2 F; G1 k- Q5 A# |& a5 k" A4 o- ^
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
; f0 N; u$ y& s" ?5 H& e
$ s' F' R7 y3 O; E唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由. u% r! ~; F4 H/ `3 N; I
5 V+ r  G' ?$ j$ x( B3 \
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句  R. M# r7 e: a8 R6 z
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"* e4 V' x: o% q+ @$ B, i4 k

3 X* T* q* c% s我們的大學生/ N9 e4 y9 Q6 N' h1 v

1 x( q4 |' C. B( i- O0 _1 S8 q: S- I& Z2 C4 v

  x% ^, _7 ]* U* A9 M6 d$ g
  _0 X6 f1 o! i" O2 S9 `

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:. f9 F2 s3 Q; p" B) A3 Z: q
! {5 t: k" W1 G- L, ~" ?9 B
# S* |, A8 B* N& X) d
有見地 !!!
" K' J) t0 S2 w3 a現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html9 a( j) Z2 \2 A
$ A0 ]# x0 c7 }' {& S- ]4 }
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
5 N- N9 x' v) j9 v. F9 DI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
% d( u0 [8 Y8 \+ l2 KI pretty sad that about the University official.
+ M- _  W! k0 M) f2 R. rIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
3 ?7 ^: [5 X- u5 a3 ]& ~- |) f: Z2 b" Y" I
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:5 Z7 N0 b" K# ?9 Q- r. Q8 @
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la4 N6 `3 I- |. F. W! H3 R! D! t

3 [" d; J$ l1 r. ?1 O; B[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

& t' V( `& w) ^( I8 C) G: y) x
" d) V- U$ E7 P. L! G) y) Q' O
兩者有何分別?
% K, f, {. G; I3 s2 Z0 `& W" x8 }中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?