奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:' r- `, ]- W6 `/ M* L

0 {; ^" @+ @' k8 }agree,# S9 b9 g" e: ]1 D& _
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
3 A3 Q3 q4 |" l4 a3 F但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
$ W) M6 {- f) O* m3 B期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

* I# A8 }5 }/ x' C3 x& L" y, x  Ohttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html$ k+ h, P+ o/ o% @( f% f6 v3 j
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
+ i6 p) _7 c$ f8 `3 E8 B/ T! g搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
! o' m0 a, a- x- X# S* O. JJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:7 U2 t% S8 I- {9 i7 g
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
/ Y% ]; X: t( L0 k* N, u; B0 b5 C/ y' u$ {% c, l, N! |0 V# o
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???9 k) O$ F. O" g  f4 ?  j
8 [) e0 k/ P+ k+ i
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

( r, }2 `% e  F  x
8 ^5 W7 _7 w3 _0 y
絕對支持啦
& t& R6 N/ k0 j  |& b; S! _$ m
有錯就認,打就企定
1 Q2 G7 S6 t9 z+ ]6 E1 m. `1 K* D6 F: G( E
無錯當然要撐到底
. D& B0 g: }; C; b! o  e' p/ {  i5 p3 b: k+ R
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
2 a# J! ]5 N2 U/ |4 i* S/ g2 e4 P1 p0 r$ Y0 T( H
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得% t  ?, G! ?6 K( W! k
8 @  P3 o' u! q7 \  ^( l
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力& O! p8 E: ]/ X) h0 Q% Z  Q- K
( \; @8 I. g$ F$ \
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
  Y4 V' Z0 q4 j, O" [% l' E" P  m7 T3 x
! X0 [0 Q. ]3 F1 P! Q唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?: ~' W3 v' N; V% F6 H) j: S; F$ Q1 z
$ P7 P- y4 C1 r0 d5 P: Q' S! G
我唔認為lor) l- L: o8 O4 Y! A

( A, ]1 k& h) W+ ^& p9 \唔係話要整死佢地) h0 d2 k7 s- {# o$ \! ^6 {& G
4 v. p) d/ @9 j* P3 M
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
" F5 g" q  ?( L, f# V, M# R
$ J) ?  E) c, ^# A* s我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大4 ^! J, b( E7 `4 h; B
) d9 g" z6 l5 l
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
1 a: H8 K. j1 D* c# B5 V5 r
! @8 h% Z0 x% ?6 D9 |3 C0 q: A7 t唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由6 v% B% h9 B0 t/ Q: C9 H+ c- c

+ Z0 E  P0 o$ x: ?& A大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
  R, A' `; A9 g% W% i4 t"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
1 K  I9 z& q1 l" ?
+ ]' m! [8 [; E. ]* y3 i3 K我們的大學生
4 Y: t2 @1 k$ V" L& k0 F, d
  |2 L! g( Z, i6 [3 }7 X8 P% x6 x" j7 V; R( f
9 f9 _0 G" u7 }# U
: r) w0 m) [2 o8 D+ ~

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
# n  }4 e0 f0 D: S
% o' }) ^- q  h: v) t: o. q
6 n8 v9 b  o% J' R, O: `有見地 !!!
# B" O2 f' l( D/ d9 Q% U現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
: g+ t- e! H2 ?+ ]7 I1 J# z; W" h/ M& O& a) m3 ?  k
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
& \+ x3 v9 m1 bI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 2 J8 Y; @: w- O$ B* F' f9 a5 i
I pretty sad that about the University official.
/ N5 Z6 v$ p# XIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la5 `9 }! h6 e8 n" `7 c1 n

  e# |7 k8 g2 s& a1 ~8 P& X, e[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
% {( _+ M4 h3 f2 h" F我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
% Z9 E! D- M, A- W2 Q* p4 @, U' z1 V$ M; |
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

/ y+ W4 U. c" l$ y1 f+ K: t; L
兩者有何分別?1 u& U& m; a  F' d6 T
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?