 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:* z& q# _/ B8 g, d0 D) F. f
" C% z& A1 t" _; ^3 z4 I/ m" {. S, \- W; ~) Y0 f
同意.
$ U% r1 Z7 l7 B" X' \但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... % `- x i/ a+ ^- k' j
3 \2 v+ T4 \, t3 E/ w' K* X8 wI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
+ X+ r7 F" I3 o) X( }& T ^7 PYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
4 q' H0 }, j, ?; ?* }I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
" n2 ^6 T5 c6 z9 [3 ^6 \As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter. x5 ~- `/ A* `& O& v& C$ u
7 t9 E: T& Z0 x
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law/ O. k Z' G# Z# P: U
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
: W+ E2 f2 w) s% {% A3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published- T5 H$ Z. O' d' { l$ A( f7 I9 [
$ j$ ]% `/ z7 M Z+ U+ |5 jThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|