奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:7 `2 y( w; u1 F2 t! x) J1 V

8 D7 H6 F4 D; Kagree,' Y. ?  `- \5 E: q0 y( c; ^
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
4 G  C$ q# f; W但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
  P) M$ @: D# E* q- I: g- j期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

& O$ Y$ B4 K9 Chttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html$ ^- h6 ~4 A8 k% E  }; y9 x
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
  _' ?6 c) h& _$ M搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.) Q% N& ?$ T: p1 B- D% _7 S" i
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:) j* t3 E7 r( e" o/ O6 V
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
" q4 r. X$ w  j. ?+ N6 F) V: k/ l* h) l0 y. W1 ^# a* U$ f, }, U
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???2 z5 `8 E/ [  I4 |; \' X

' F7 F, H/ v( l8 w$ \" f, \為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

& ^0 T4 p- Y! f8 }) k/ o
! N7 ^" {# K# C" o1 y3 P& ~絕對支持啦. h% t. {* ^8 s# d; Z% U
2 m  L) D. `* K# }0 V' q
有錯就認,打就企定
* @9 [" ^- m) B  S2 Y5 e3 m3 y9 g8 {2 [* R( o, {
無錯當然要撐到底3 ]: K6 U9 f" ?' v

; C+ d- |2 D" U6 g0 h8 u+ J但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩! u% K$ D# w* t$ i$ S4 r- ~

) G+ S) z& I) b% ?+ R! ?# J在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
% Y9 F' }1 M* o# J2 g8 P4 {& P1 q2 K0 S
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
2 A/ E3 N) X2 Z! ]
! {7 c( V2 t; l4 R7 D我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
" i3 U) R) y* e4 m+ {
) i, B7 h$ ^& p3 a唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?9 D  e, x2 X+ b" X/ T4 g, c

4 q& Q( H" j) @# n, O. C( [8 [0 L我唔認為lor
  N3 p% @2 @) G' r" S7 k6 s& S4 r9 p
唔係話要整死佢地
1 x: S/ g+ A; p3 @4 D
! N) @8 ^$ _5 V8 \4 |( z而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用2 |6 |( }) Q, ~( v1 n* I
. [3 k4 V6 q1 E
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大7 a6 X: a5 K  _/ o9 _6 X

; M7 M9 U9 c, o4 ~1 l1 l有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的5 J4 D* C/ R8 E* ]% I
+ E" n2 n" t+ T' C7 G+ K" I
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由, ?) |; o' I3 I& ?6 _( U

9 H/ l5 w" M9 u大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句9 K: E% E- F' N; t8 t5 @
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
8 f2 n# O. ~. T' P+ {# @6 W: }; b3 b
我們的大學生- n. W; C8 `9 W
/ R1 C- ?2 y5 V0 E( t8 O

: v4 e6 |2 D- {# K" i
# b# ^% }; _- B+ ^
7 Y1 H  s- w% f. q/ [

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
* e% ^. T6 _1 r( f+ u9 E* ?! b9 g8 @% P" P7 ?! O; H& I3 j
8 V8 d  U3 @' Z, Q
有見地 !!!
: |( q! m# |* `2 ^1 F' R現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html( ~0 Z# ?) f4 ?; n% S# w- R# J
! F# U. M# U9 C5 j! A
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 7 f1 h9 E7 o1 t
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 8 Q& e  f  B$ v, I
I pretty sad that about the University official.: ~3 ~' R5 V1 o# S. i# c% @
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la. \7 [" |3 @# I8 r  L: X

+ S. P4 ^) j7 ^+ z4 g5 P/ w/ R[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:3 r% V9 Q  h5 K1 H2 d7 u
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
5 V/ [  n+ o9 ?: C) n
2 V  Y8 h9 p# d3 u* q8 ][ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

( y# e* Z: C. s2 F0 H, Y9 O0 o; p
兩者有何分別?- k, w/ y( u: K5 |
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?