Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
7 o' Y. e# P  m$ l7 ^, x, ^8 ]/ [6 Y6 s) C$ D6 @4 d/ }! b5 _4 n) f' {7 k: ]

% Z7 s! S9 n" ]. x& j) m我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

' Z( z0 b  w7 g9 i$ P3 D
  |  T1 Q; L1 X- I4 z- T
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:$ m. U$ B2 e8 a9 y
5 X" Y' @0 c' J9 i- D1 y# m

" Z+ A0 f% h! O5 gIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

2 p$ u' z% a# L8 t

: T! @/ _( T0 D, V# z+ I, |! ooh really...0 w- e* x/ l5 p) Z3 d; J8 p
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"( l  ^; x' b( }) |
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
9 O& T5 \& i" n) c
/ L. K; [- k+ ?4 x8 P* d當然這是個假設性問題
" x7 Q9 \! {- {4 V: R. S7 Y但將人數倍大
. ~, z% I5 e( ?4 r7 f例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
/ M6 ~8 W( t, x) ~8 p(情況可以換作其他)% j; y7 a/ R7 p( M/ I9 G9 ^
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
! S4 g8 J# B& f3 e/ D如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
7 m! t+ U# z8 U如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
  H4 r9 s1 l& X. d& t3 T( B7 X+ n! L絕情谷既問題...
! O5 g# C3 r- f0 f如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...  p0 w3 n4 p! u1 g$ G1 b8 C
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

6 D( W2 q9 s% h! z, K# s2 F
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
' e3 Y6 c* M- u: ?9 x於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
) ]$ k4 p! {1 l8 z7 c- b- W+ ?: D- U: g) l但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
- G& Q) b% e  R& U. `好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
7 f& J% ~- U4 {其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
8 x- O4 ?2 F% M& O5 Y5 j# V7 q4 A6 K
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命' K7 r- v% J( ?8 w; Y+ a' o
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
* h- K5 ^: N' W4 K6 p- ~  ?其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

$ R; g" H+ P2 e3 Q: i$ E' p
! G5 D. {" W7 P& ehaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣9 L7 Q: ]5 q3 f( R3 S& d/ J
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....# h: y8 u& |$ y$ P( K
2 ?/ {2 R  a* I! [9 I1 D! h6 E
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
& g$ B" x3 B- B, syes, my reason is helping more
& V& z' G( O% }+ g1 I1 Zfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!9 A; K: i5 H: ~, \+ Y  b
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
: X+ a4 b! {6 |$ B* W1 m2 |) Wbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?* y/ l9 N! A- q% q4 q
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!' m1 }' k4 M* l
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!: ]" c, ?. }3 t5 z# Y# R% u4 [  s
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
$ x  Q# E5 O0 N# p當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~- C+ O$ x! a; I+ g: |
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~! F6 ^9 K- {  K
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
' H# M& {4 H4 F1 B& s% @6 x即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
' E4 J. _' k5 t0 y我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
7 n1 S& f9 k- p. m/ z但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
" l+ j" |0 ~4 s; x# y我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）