Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
+ d% T4 f" w7 e) c4 m# x  a) Z; b! q& h" m& c

9 r3 o6 C  x; |我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

6 A; E1 K$ ^0 {1 I6 B: k6 F! _: w3 c1 A$ Z& H6 G4 _' U2 k9 w$ _$ b) j
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:  k# y9 z8 X$ [# ?% X2 E
" Q* `) C. t% [4 Q/ V1 L

( t1 K# J8 d9 O9 M6 q# f/ ]In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

3 t* }1 ]4 O* Z9 y8 D" }* t/ V# v4 J1 _. ?
oh really...% n# H& L* F6 m9 I$ \
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"' E% T& Q  s+ t$ E
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題9 W4 I' p/ c0 W3 H5 Y3 |* }, K$ d
& V2 m, X8 \$ m0 M: i$ L" S# s
當然這是個假設性問題' I8 y  e& M6 {! l
但將人數倍大
% `. ]6 f) C. K# Q. f例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
1 j9 A, g) C2 A# N+ V; M5 M(情況可以換作其他), |6 L) A  S% P) c3 _
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
# {8 }) j( U0 X+ y  C7 V9 q" {, \# u如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
- k+ n3 A/ c8 \$ [1 D如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
# u2 `2 U$ M" @( K! T3 L! N5 |絕情谷既問題...; H& Y- {" X( m" K
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...* ^  p6 o: z* J
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

% h9 Z) b  \6 P- |( C1 D
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
" r8 f+ F4 P+ R" T於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
% A/ p% o0 S5 J1 J( a+ s但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩# O) _% H# ~  X- N
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢3 L6 I8 G; z' z8 A
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢& e; O/ f+ i- w( r9 P

( z$ a# ]4 N* ?3 z3 @我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
1 W* Z9 p  x  x/ v不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:. \$ ~. N2 n9 [: M8 t: f, V
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

3 ~9 [4 T4 G( C$ k3 r* E0 @

$ o' \8 l- ~2 L/ j$ v# nhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
" s' o: s' w6 |$ o/ ?你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
# T! ~" l# h" T0 ]
: w$ X0 N" N1 ^% }% w8 Pp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
2 d, g* b1 q5 {& _yes, my reason is helping more1 U( Z& C. Z. |0 M) ~! E
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
7 J! s: s4 I: ~' k2 v7 i; h- {7 vif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
3 X' v5 L1 J5 jbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
! J6 r2 |9 S2 R- ^+ |2 g% @also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
4 q0 k8 O6 N! b2 x* ymay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
: J$ Q# e( |* y( gunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~# K  y4 x3 r; M9 E5 M& z; _; y9 c4 @9 L
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~2 n7 j. A9 a; d
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
3 q* Q& R% u" I* b1 X! U正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~5 [3 K3 N  e  y+ k9 E: _  C. s7 o$ q
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~6 ]! O; O- `( Q+ o
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~. Z2 [$ o* o" ]: j- x
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
. w3 y/ Z5 G1 W2 S% r我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）