vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:
: }4 d4 Z7 F' K: ?4 G8 a0 N: I反轉黎諗& U" d1 C2 f: z! `/ Y. N! X% ~$ M! a
ps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版
; D% M5 j- m2 _) X: C, T- a你睇下DC,X-box+ V7 }  ?" L& `$ Z* P- m- ^& E5 |: E
同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比5 ?/ M) }2 m4 }8 S
你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

/ n$ p" G- w2 Y6 o- Y0 Z講中曬!!!
" Y  k, a9 m7 q* f3 P* ?7 {2 Z- {' _* k, @% ?" ~* |3 s
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。) j5 C2 C% i+ _% q
# g- z5 V* \! b- u& _
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
. N* L3 c/ N8 G7 m% L物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

2 b, `3 X6 Q3 H  a+ G
o甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖
! f1 n( G2 m9 L. ^5 y4 A6 Y, n9 L" m% M% {4 i% p* e
要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps2) F! l1 T5 L2 @* a2 G
+ D; s; H9 m# l+ ]. L1 S+ b% b
其實政府今次立法原意係岩' K" |7 a" @' @% M
但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權' A3 |+ D9 U' Q! m" r
唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管# I# m- p: T" h3 b
. |! I7 Z; m6 b& N
另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事2 m* Q* F7 g4 A1 C9 d. @
一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢
( P9 y9 b  Z( E; m眾所周知
1 t# P  \9 i4 s) c; yps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版& }9 g* b$ o* O. D% U
佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps2. a/ H  z7 p! z7 M# p8 U
到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:! Y1 g3 J* [2 [! P

& a8 h; O% r6 V: g- b% O1 ~0 Q' d講中曬!!!
; I$ F! u6 @; f! A
0 V( k$ Q( Z1 S9 Q& o2 I, E仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。
; ^0 i3 y3 d& D) A
2 L" P$ f- _: ^/ \$ b2 f4 F講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

! M' v9 g/ e0 [5 ]+ W
對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~
# C; ^/ }( B  `  s5 Y! V5 m9 G3 g: [; {6 U1 `$ ]( @( }& k
ps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...
6 z% C5 m1 D) R: Z8 w, Q7 {. \其實最簡單一樣野7 k- Q% `2 J  g9 N, B. g9 @3 W
正版好似翻版咁平8 s/ f0 [" z1 J2 I+ h8 b8 K) L
或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁
/ ^; v* n& w- q) [' |$ X4 ]咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?$ ?! P+ P1 D" ^& |; n2 y+ h- q

) z5 Y4 W! C3 mBut I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子
( T1 @- _+ }. I- ^  O6 f% x因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,
( n1 n8 I$ D' f) T- _$ k/ T2 W& s但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法3 k$ \3 O/ y: h  ]& |* s+ ?! R
我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣* S; q$ q9 O) d# `$ ]! H. o
再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..
- o: N7 j) }7 B- |- o改機既用途
3 g3 l' s$ `) D- F6 E" h( g如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉
) P; U6 H. h5 y8 ?- F8 v5 j政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~
5 x9 X& q' ?! ~1 W我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』