vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:
1 L# h) ~% t1 B5 R. {+ _反轉黎諗, K. ?% y) a7 D9 H
ps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版$ g# ?& Q7 s1 p. C
你睇下DC,X-box- a4 x. G/ |" S$ z
同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比
& s# I, o- c9 n! }% g) @' r1 A你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

# Z5 t$ a& e* ~# n. G5 D
講中曬!!!. z3 j4 g8 t( }# _4 y

7 L" b- ~* ]' [; d3 D4 _仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。, K' W- s: C- {* B

" C5 x0 b9 a1 P% k+ D講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
3 V0 L+ E# w" D物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

" r: b; o2 Z' x$ e, O; q
o甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖! \! m: m; W2 {" N4 W

# ^; X% o2 R1 ]* ?! d3 B, W7 P要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps2
2 U: ]% L4 N& n7 j" ?1 j
$ `2 e; z6 X$ P9 X, F8 d其實政府今次立法原意係岩5 {5 t3 R7 D7 H
但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權6 ]& k$ q& f6 Q2 o
唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管  I. k9 r5 D6 ~+ w' |

( l2 R+ r* n0 P$ f! P1 a% I另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事
( O5 E' ]9 H! G: \9 p" E一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢
6 `2 I5 L. a" l9 R' V% z眾所周知
6 K% F( b' c2 A9 {# Zps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版
3 O4 ^( V- U4 \" v3 C' w: w  x佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps2& L6 v9 Z+ [+ h8 j7 {$ v+ ^9 C
到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
" t/ v( n/ h) c9 H" Q+ u; \& m5 Q$ Y. p5 \: C& ?8 p
講中曬!!!
+ ^8 n7 `- F; X! B5 K" [! z5 A& p
4 P$ e' Z! ]) ?仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。9 J3 A1 z' f/ x! F( A0 x! E
7 S, u# ~& [* ~# ^+ f- F
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

. F# w* ~* O, R9 O: P9 S$ ?- u
對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~5 ^7 _9 ]( C$ n
; Z! p5 C: i0 Y* n9 w  p# ]0 Y
ps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...
; y' p' M' K0 [$ O# \其實最簡單一樣野4 D( a9 p0 Q# E( p; @6 l
正版好似翻版咁平
6 H: r2 _9 u0 U+ c& G9 p3 |或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁
$ i3 N0 O' X! U# h* p7 J, b. R: k咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?
- w. \& @% i2 d6 V- O  O% m/ j+ Q# d/ y2 l; \8 O; q7 T6 T
But I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子
: Y8 I, e, Z5 [5 u2 X) p因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,
3 [7 u- D9 ?& o2 t0 J但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法- D* g$ R* U/ G$ h" f4 v
我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣: C3 N9 a+ o. E5 c5 n$ o
再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..+ I" ]" f( d. v1 ^, T
改機既用途6 z7 `9 T( H4 I1 w* P' w* N0 d
如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉
) i9 j+ I9 D6 V4 F7 k政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~   i( H3 M& H2 |+ P2 X5 _+ C
我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』