Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:, t: X& I/ a  b/ R) m

' h( _' i1 w* P- v5 d) c* Z7 n% _: Z, b" Z5 Y3 ^
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

' H  S* t+ T* {/ G  x
/ w- A4 S) c5 @- j) _  \
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
. I! `' w' w- U3 y8 o* v2 e6 c3 N
  O* s- V8 A4 O9 l7 e' Q" N* y8 F  w6 Y$ _; Q: n$ R' `5 E: F
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

  k# q- t, i0 m3 R& U2 R6 p; g7 l: ]" I# \2 f# r
oh really...
+ ]- ^9 [5 H0 whahhaa, thx a lot^^"6 m/ e- @1 I9 ?  U( P7 _0 x
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
/ n( j" e' P: p5 N  n% m& V0 Q: v1 k7 }0 R  V9 i
當然這是個假設性問題
( d8 i7 p2 E3 D! {" a但將人數倍大8 ?! r# g' A" S2 h% t
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
) d+ x$ j5 w0 v(情況可以換作其他). D% L6 z: h. a$ ^- n
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
) A7 {9 D, l6 J! s" a7 T& y/ h  Y如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
7 T1 H: I4 e$ {- [9 o如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:  {4 z4 k3 P  K+ @8 c; W3 c# d% r+ ^
絕情谷既問題...
9 I# A0 L& }  A0 r( M5 ~1 F如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
/ t  U& r, [/ W  g如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

0 Z+ z. i" V! p% ^# s
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好7 l6 n% h, n+ \% w* |0 W; ]& o
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
9 \/ D( k2 n: }但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
/ k9 C, Z" j; @; @3 _& d好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢6 w! i. M' t5 a: ]) ]
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢7 E( v' Q+ z; j0 i0 z
! h; ^* l- U$ c$ t2 [. P9 i  Z  G
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命# S0 W" p" h8 w$ v, X. K7 u
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:1 y: y4 }, q0 U3 y6 e
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

( h+ N2 R5 a# i; A

+ o4 p, e9 j4 jhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
, |7 K7 W6 A0 m  I+ R. _* x( X你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....* [0 B2 \. o" ]+ a5 V
* c3 [/ H) b, O( s' U
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child9 B0 W# a3 `4 p3 B- m& m% @) D
yes, my reason is helping more( {" o  F) g' g" T2 d/ h, u$ O
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
$ q( ~8 ]$ ~) c) f  c6 {% Cif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
, C. [, g4 `" Lbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
9 }( b8 D$ p  m" R4 c: X$ |7 valso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
' B8 h/ v: k; Amay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
. O/ U4 F# y9 u5 E" Y- G2 }/ Eunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~- d% p% ^8 K. _9 B9 R8 ~
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~2 v" x' m: j4 U, ~
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
! N* P8 u/ s/ f正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~2 |$ s% ~( C% N$ D2 O  q" a9 B
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
1 k+ n4 i1 M5 p( B6 R5 v" j我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~3 d- L4 W1 f2 W4 P# w/ d  b
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
8 L2 x* |% Z9 C我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）