Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:2 g/ ~! L9 h( x: b0 [8 o$ B
( d& f# D* d0 U2 y) g, E7 u, b" N

/ y% r% f% R, z! U6 z6 t9 e! k我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

8 y  G; v0 T/ n2 r; @6 b
7 J, P1 n8 ^3 ]9 P9 l' H4 _6 ]
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:- |' L% O( q' e) \
; j0 P4 O6 q: j# D

& d7 g" [/ u4 P* ?7 Q; VIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

! H/ X3 L+ g5 t8 t3 P3 n; e* E2 A! K7 A" q1 @& n% S
oh really...) P: o) R7 g! o8 [
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"& R+ C  `0 }) Z, r1 I
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
0 y! ^) b  J. \# a$ G
3 }5 @0 K9 X+ ^1 a+ P' _當然這是個假設性問題
# K; @1 h$ t' Z但將人數倍大  N- v" I% r) |) c$ w
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個% X8 z, [2 ?  N) @4 x9 |
(情況可以換作其他)
) v$ j, X) d6 h6 q" a& K始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
" v7 L; b* F  D! D! j1 B/ W, E7 j如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...4 u0 T+ N, k) w' {
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:1 I: z! E$ v. u  g2 ^2 J- _6 |
絕情谷既問題...
; O0 s2 M5 J; F3 s; D如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
& o4 X4 P! o/ L如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

6 j3 w( ?" k* ?# Z, x" J/ |2 e5 U殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好  @+ o; M% n' n6 N6 g2 g
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
% u& B3 A6 a/ L- O但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
+ s+ [& Z! B  a4 {# T好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢& r+ C; k& o% v% l. W
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
0 Y  l) W7 B. r/ _4 x0 K* F! {, G/ t6 w* u) i
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命5 f; m: z$ v4 T# n+ n7 c7 {# J
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:2 B' p/ X- o3 C: n
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

( o+ D2 B& o. L3 o7 W1 s& C7 M
6 H/ g/ t( S! @+ M  _7 f3 S% P7 U
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
' \% h# x6 i- |6 U* s. F你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了...., Z$ `8 |. P) V# S8 `

6 `5 c/ Q$ J4 Op.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
; A6 h% l) _( Qyes, my reason is helping more
) s) b' W2 _/ _% E3 I& _for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
5 Y  W$ o* P. R+ U, o3 |3 a" K9 |if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
  k: W, A  r& h2 \1 p% E( s( ?because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
3 P0 ^; D- t5 B8 ralso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!7 @1 D* F- N" o& x
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
! z7 o- v/ }/ f2 junder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~( _8 N' G" e7 s/ R1 [. [
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~. i: K# _: @: D& x/ q  F/ q' O# B5 O
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~1 e9 N+ [! K+ @" h* J8 H
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
+ J; ^: w6 N& l" E1 R% b. z即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~9 y1 g& o# X# M) I6 d. {
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
9 R  T* [& @9 z$ y7 g但如果o係當時o既情況中~~4 C) m8 }; \% G4 ~
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）