Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:, c9 p' I0 \* S( \% Z' D

0 ?7 I( @5 A  ?( M+ n. s5 Z1 a6 J. v% ~' `. r
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

: ~+ E% w. w; M5 \. Y2 G. e4 {, A. O4 H& T. L+ a4 g
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
+ @) P( G$ C3 F0 W! ]
6 j4 p' f0 E, M" B" ~8 R2 s" L. |; H7 U0 W
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

. s$ i: }' L( B6 y8 {& q
8 }! i6 c% P0 R# ?oh really...+ T$ s& F: R7 ]2 c! n6 s
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
$ q* y; @3 D# V, V; D; W- T$ wi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題% |# Q1 q7 V/ Y% L# u

9 L; T! M( u8 T當然這是個假設性問題
, i2 D! `: {5 k" A& a& A8 G# W# Z& I但將人數倍大8 h6 D9 e1 A& x9 N
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個5 Y/ n6 w* ]% k
(情況可以換作其他)
( N) A! @+ l: r' E$ A始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...2 ?0 N* {' @3 C! T) @2 [( Z: z3 v
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...+ @7 R- \; m4 K
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
" A( l8 G$ U) r# b5 v( `$ h1 K絕情谷既問題...
/ _: I; J4 z. Q如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
8 v( Y2 N( h% z) w2 ~如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

4 E& C/ z/ y5 c/ b殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好( x7 }5 }% w. L! d; ~& Y
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生$ ]/ L* P/ m8 Y* A
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩% R' X, ]' E2 I- V8 T- g
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
0 L/ v6 W3 _% K8 p7 z. w其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢* g% o7 K( K6 p) d6 H, A

# Q1 ?0 E# ~, ]8 U7 z$ X我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
4 d! U2 i. G% S9 p* c. c, l7 }不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:1 k2 g( Y8 q+ G/ ^1 d
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

: S6 u" t5 O0 N7 ^% C2 ?& B
1 o: p' e% m( l$ F$ B1 u4 r
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣8 M6 W% e1 ^$ j$ @
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....  f5 _& p) X. @$ n  j$ f4 [$ p
! b9 m2 x+ F9 {% Y9 Y- e
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child" |' G' S+ i4 G7 T
yes, my reason is helping more
: T' F& w6 J8 l* Q  y# P2 x5 Sfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
" z" j9 ^7 f1 S0 L0 \if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child; s2 l9 i% p4 U
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?# O) V3 }6 ?" e1 i, i# U# I4 P
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
+ ^2 d! w8 f! A' qmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!- j$ B9 `9 Q2 `+ u* I6 u
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
# L& M: `/ Y8 _* K當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~  J6 v/ T4 _8 R
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
/ `1 G% a9 {' q) z6 q: u正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
: ~7 h8 b. p& [- ?3 g3 ?0 g7 ^# Y即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~+ U+ l3 J( Q8 B# d
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
4 ]7 h) K( a2 k8 ^& v' z2 Z但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
3 M. ~; F2 L. i我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）