Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
/ G/ S) ^0 K5 [8 t  n( m# V1 t6 t' C4 W& K' K5 S8 N1 ?

# G1 ~5 X" X' L- ^: N我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

9 v1 @& D' Q' |

7 k3 r8 u: Q& k! B% zIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:0 ?. @) _( X( q9 d' }& \
0 K8 P* t  l5 @& ]- z8 Q8 T2 S# ?

* P2 m! R" M! \, J& rIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

0 F4 p. V/ A; t+ h2 K4 p/ }4 s) |6 ]

6 F9 R2 x! ~# O7 z  ~$ ?0 \oh really...
/ D  ?" O: z" nhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
$ n5 l; |) B' |  X5 Qi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題, H0 J0 w6 n) `6 [0 I
: G0 Y+ f- x- Q
當然這是個假設性問題
1 W5 b6 |$ N' ]! Y但將人數倍大9 d% J5 p# A  u
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
, Q, P4 j& r- U4 Y, Y( W' T" s(情況可以換作其他)( L9 ^# X! C3 z$ h: J
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...1 b/ j" N2 k: M9 x
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
+ h" F- O$ j& K- h' }如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:5 Z1 a  Z8 u: k2 y! T. o1 L7 }
絕情谷既問題...8 H7 Z' S3 M$ T8 n  L0 z, a' a
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...- ]' J8 c( |, L5 g! g, |0 \
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

  K! W' X- `: h  C2 |* [3 e殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好; R" Z) o: ]" L( b' X! c4 m: G
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
# W9 X5 Q+ D3 |; Y$ I7 ^但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩0 y/ e7 `+ g- d8 Z3 n
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢0 h$ w; L/ F, J% O4 E( b
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
; C  _4 u1 e3 V. Y& l( h9 F. R0 w& `) N% f" j  B1 c0 ^/ K
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命- }0 s; g7 N5 u7 \
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:! |* O3 f* `1 D' B" ~% W. Q/ g* K
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

. I$ H2 l$ y: b% I
$ n' o( u6 C* O# r) o! ohaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣7 L. j7 I8 \% A
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
4 N+ w! ^( F3 ?; A& c. Y- p2 }; c& I& R# T1 F8 A4 \
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child( A# L* D2 q2 |+ u( G+ r9 P
yes, my reason is helping more
7 Q; o# O  K4 t% q0 ^/ `% i3 B' L; M, L- rfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
# @$ {3 t. [0 r( K: s. zif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
' ^: g# \+ X3 i9 R! D7 X+ Dbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
/ P( w+ U( v3 N: n1 R3 s7 \, R4 Oalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!- R; Z9 D) r$ L& k6 L
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
/ f4 Z4 j+ Z3 W' iunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~/ L) h6 p/ a+ F3 e! @% n6 m/ D
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
# D- E5 I! e- ], v我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
+ X# }+ K/ q& L正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
3 y' f$ D. h! [, |' h1 K: X" m即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~+ }6 N% [$ F& Z6 }! t
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~- W9 [- A( d* W* M
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
7 K$ x/ S4 d; ?& ?3 d) D5 v% O' n我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）