Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:6 q& G( ~$ j5 e. K, S/ D- p
* u9 `; e6 M) X/ _8 W, W8 }

5 g6 E/ l% C: z  a/ V! t我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

: Q' t6 j' Q5 J2 D  z3 v  l, l. k9 e. B4 i+ r: D& F0 l
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:- p& H6 z/ i5 F7 O
) ?' ]! Q% A+ S. P

3 @* }0 i- i* m9 h& n4 ZIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

$ z/ |: ^1 r; `. V" K
# u7 Q% i6 c6 r$ d4 n5 }# ?% Y
oh really...& D$ S3 X  b4 @9 M  K1 Y+ s$ X3 ]( o  _
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
/ K% D4 b6 Y8 W3 M5 mi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題( p4 K" P# R7 l5 v

8 ]! G, |# a4 \+ i2 K% J當然這是個假設性問題9 }+ h: y5 n. I* l$ l  g
但將人數倍大
+ e! [3 ?8 p1 H' j$ C例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個0 \: m3 c. P# K/ o/ t
(情況可以換作其他)
; X# t6 a9 i2 R1 M# B8 x+ F始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...$ b8 T+ m1 y" w& r+ c' ?# Z
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
2 \7 @  s" L0 Z如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
, Q$ g4 {! Y5 R! e5 ]3 M絕情谷既問題...
& E5 D+ M& H* ~& F$ \5 \# c$ k如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
, T$ \: V7 p# ?# j. b2 ^如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

4 M8 [4 d! h# h
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好+ f6 [" x* b- t; y0 Q  _  q
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生" Y! L9 F) M* T. B+ e
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩5 B' w; |4 x7 t; R3 L
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢- B- e% H2 G& H  F
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
* I/ {$ S7 {5 ]  y( G. T0 W9 }# y9 w; j0 ^+ M% I% F
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
0 ?) N0 J5 }1 ~" P$ u2 u1 `' Y/ m/ b, b不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:! X' Y6 v, \8 P8 n: ^- }
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

$ Y# r. Y/ }3 H$ }) |
4 W+ [7 a$ j1 uhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
; e+ p4 Q! f) {1 n- j, q& _+ P你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....8 \; \% ~  K5 |: h5 N

. q" `$ p8 {" |. Op.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child6 \! @5 [8 N: J! I8 P5 Q6 x6 ?( h
yes, my reason is helping more
/ G1 S. A4 X/ D7 b# t" Gfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
7 E0 z) x  L+ M' T( Nif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child8 U( I& V6 q, c- a! P* _
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
% B  R% C; b# o3 C1 c1 a; Xalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!$ G; `% q$ `0 p$ q7 I7 S( M
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!. U: G: b" ]& @: L) u7 k
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~  t0 k' k) D1 x$ }, q
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
( ?$ _# J0 l* L/ E% H1 I我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
( z& d; V/ m$ \  r8 ?正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
6 J8 S+ S  e% N+ D; c: X0 d即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~& I9 M  f( l0 P9 A' W4 O
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~5 ~; l3 U% |8 G( Y% a
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
4 {: ?- }0 X6 S' n$ Q: l$ s! W9 g/ f2 F我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）