Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:# R& V  f0 |/ ^' H9 X: D. o  G

$ [5 M1 n# _7 Q8 p3 L- }6 z5 G. v6 ]2 ]
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

' N5 a' C  j3 C9 Y
8 D. u9 X& L; u' E' |: XIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
3 |' b; w# s* e  p0 W/ M6 H# Z- M3 t, B: s2 t; t2 Q3 O

8 W; W- A& Q, |+ }. O) u  n* d, fIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

, o! Q7 o) A$ K7 b% l2 _0 i: W/ ?8 H
$ w7 I+ p: w8 H+ b1 Loh really...0 k2 f: F: S, e7 M1 P/ E
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"9 X. X" ?3 M" d) r2 ^  C
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題) r# l$ X+ ?' z& I
6 a6 I( z' Y, |0 V5 H% A' C9 w
當然這是個假設性問題
( i$ a5 E0 ]* l3 h" R2 f但將人數倍大
, P; n8 l. s1 a: L" V9 w- Y; f例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
7 n3 f: x( ]8 Q# z(情況可以換作其他)
# Y: b  I' U/ `# w. L; P' Y7 h" r( G& ?始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
: h. k/ D6 M4 M' p) g/ {# k$ ]# q5 a如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...+ \7 d/ [& V( O" T5 Z) P7 z0 n# r
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
6 ]- {! S, d1 L7 @4 Z2 Y絕情谷既問題...
$ x0 q  u% {. t4 s- \; e! z9 H如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
3 o0 j, Z: u! {. i9 U( L5 ~如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

2 U& b  y# n& x% W4 d) c
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好  {4 s, H! p' i" j* o. B
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
' j8 r3 V+ n% ?' r但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
- p8 C$ D/ p) Q2 t7 ~) O好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢8 K+ V6 U; l* U7 n# I" H
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
; E, T. {3 O! t% J/ e/ D" ]* n4 A$ M. t- C% j
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
4 W  ^+ q8 `5 U$ |% _- M5 T2 Q不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:% t- {- r/ _6 v) t  ]
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

! i0 ^) @! x5 U( I9 H1 c' Q$ a

0 k5 @& I% \+ B; Ehaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣8 b6 S% ?6 l0 _& m3 k+ g  G) K
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....& L/ A" T+ J; G& v0 W/ O7 h
: x+ b5 f- o. k+ u) g7 i* @
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
7 k  v# q% h' {+ l2 f. T4 s% R8 P; Jyes, my reason is helping more3 p) ^: C% ?/ A. b
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!8 S5 ]0 C& t" h! n) B
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child- V) q# |. s+ P- C3 F3 J* V% E8 b
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
& ]+ M- v0 j) F* ?) @* J  b1 B& \also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!7 \+ N* H: Z3 G" ?/ e! m4 C
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!8 S/ [- O8 u+ E+ I/ _
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~4 [8 U8 J7 p# Q4 j2 o, i- v6 C
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
- F, G" X7 O! ], t( Z: H我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~; C1 c( {/ F/ r* R8 G, @" C% j* l6 o+ ]
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
& A4 i1 N8 v3 |& @- ?% w; b即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
: _' d8 A) V# V# B9 z" |' k$ I我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~# w5 J" x$ N, O0 q2 T
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
* G! F3 n6 O! ]6 o% H! I我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）