Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:% ^, ]* l% _; W7 G2 M! J3 K3 Y
: f3 |2 ]$ o1 |6 r. ~3 Y, J0 o/ P
0 D5 h  S' L1 u) Y# i, J. v6 O1 e0 Y
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

* f. f& \: D4 z! F5 A6 f

8 M& z$ m# g  vIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:3 W% O, s% I$ e2 b; Y# y

5 l6 |1 ]& Z, e# C: m+ ^! @% |' ~+ t; V& m3 A; T7 z/ ~
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

' \2 ]0 R# ]8 a- J3 |4 I
' i) l/ X8 e" [( X' t9 V$ @0 goh really...$ X7 V/ q' r4 a0 k$ l, ~
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
  X$ k$ w1 j9 M& H, V; e5 v% P8 ]i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題" ], f( f- t* K8 a4 [5 f8 v
! ~" U0 X% |- l' w7 s" g. L
當然這是個假設性問題; p7 p0 C, s7 b1 D* Q/ o
但將人數倍大" r/ L, k' `; q' u
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
% R) C1 S' @5 F9 N1 o(情況可以換作其他)( F# o+ E" W, X
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
9 z1 F$ L8 ?/ R5 B如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
, B8 z- R% i: ]& g- L% A如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:& I; \0 J( @( Q: w  n
絕情谷既問題...
% `# {' K0 F' ~5 ]如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...# s% w! e2 m4 I3 m* h
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

3 ^! i1 l, ?* V4 w6 w  u4 {殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好& `. n) L+ ^! S2 h6 F
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生, q, @) r' G: Q) H3 C- b
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩  Q6 Y8 L/ o' a1 X8 Q
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
0 c& T+ h8 k2 ]' W& @其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
9 _0 i! M4 i0 v1 I2 ?
' D; t% |; C. s我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
9 W) j  l. }0 t9 Q. z4 R1 o不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
( j1 X" O# k+ w; i其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

( U2 M- v) o" X8 {2 _. g. O. d
1 Q7 S5 ?) J7 ^  |( l6 Fhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣5 o, Z5 R, j, a+ M
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....% L# b7 `! J9 {. h

- q8 K9 S# A- h+ j! {6 Zp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child" D7 t! n# r1 h1 t. M  K4 D1 @
yes, my reason is helping more
/ S: `  K2 f$ ?% x% n8 A5 ufor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!/ Y! f( I; @% K5 |  e2 z* L
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child4 u; e3 x1 p3 l/ y& m% [
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?7 t$ }* a( Q( b  |+ h" i" r6 Y9 [
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
2 r2 E4 x" v9 E# Bmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
( v* t: d# c+ m  Y+ Uunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~: D% C) X. {" n) b8 q8 e
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
) Y( B, @2 I: [, M7 e我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
: n% U$ r+ r0 G: l7 u- ~% b% m7 v7 U正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~( i$ j1 b, [; G" R. m
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~) B! ~* x* i& j- i0 W
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~7 d% z8 J) ?% d. I1 M1 G" `( I: L3 r
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~# L+ m2 u0 H# M2 P% x& L/ ^" B- x
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）