Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:5 C' ?8 C' a- ~2 N. c( [# X4 D

4 K! h) b, p' k; N/ t- y
$ r; Z( v# s# t( A: \我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

: ?1 H6 Y& h' L/ o% U9 m' U+ X! f7 N
* T$ ~+ R1 U- V6 q3 D3 b: b0 S2 j
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:1 s, e  _; J' l" q

% `9 y* W$ q, n' `5 l& \$ K( j# i6 b) d: a
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

! V2 E# O) f$ A! q7 c: D" D1 n1 e( S: I
oh really...# O) u9 K8 P8 B. E/ W
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"2 T  f7 H/ ~9 n
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題4 ^, I' y3 Z( p$ |

- u: i7 c7 l/ w7 H當然這是個假設性問題7 X( \4 H: q/ E+ u/ \% a
但將人數倍大: l/ i, h( F: O8 _. J3 |4 g5 B
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
- C, `: v& v4 J$ C(情況可以換作其他)
6 X, Q6 o9 x1 Q& H# R1 b始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
' U) r% Q  e  c! O) Q7 Q0 e0 d1 [如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...3 [. l1 `3 R( g
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
0 I/ f" A; M6 V2 d絕情谷既問題...
7 G' w# a  h% m$ q  \如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...4 _! ^$ d# b9 r9 L0 _: U
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

0 I$ M% E- o( ?0 |; b6 e, T- J
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
) e* B, r9 h7 B' P. g: S於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
+ G) U/ M; B3 ~2 V& i但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
; G- N  N) X  q; u# f! \好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
% G; v% A6 \9 Z. I" V2 \其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
( l' i0 C- C  i! I# t6 p* U7 S4 G  w' K+ v3 t: Q2 t: @) g* \0 I6 R
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
4 @3 b: n/ }' B2 @: p不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:" F4 Y5 W0 x7 F. z1 L
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

" u9 r2 d0 E. z7 D# @. j" Z. y* P7 V. _0 u: I* G  o1 w# o; ]7 r. W
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
7 P" m- `9 t% |7 ~# Y6 Y你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....  A; L/ ]5 V. f% J, x

) j5 ^0 C2 s4 B/ G! _p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
5 I* X$ h4 }; \$ z1 o0 a, q4 Uyes, my reason is helping more, F4 i3 `. A9 b+ v& t
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
  g# n) {2 h5 ]0 B* a  s6 `2 eif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child  F5 G3 u/ {3 r* m
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
1 t8 u, P3 v6 valso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
* \9 j/ @6 T2 U6 w/ j1 D4 ]: U; jmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
7 K$ T3 @( ^/ vunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~0 D; \  D; X5 g" H* K, e- G+ q
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
( Q8 M' f  O0 B! _$ Q我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~2 Y& U  a3 q  Q6 v  [
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
$ g$ M+ E. ]1 U5 R9 ^! ]2 K即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~/ c, Y* x' F; ]* ~8 K0 D: E0 k9 k
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~4 A  C$ J2 {+ H' l# C: D
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
9 \" z% V8 V6 T$ v' f我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）