Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
$ G0 K5 }7 x" `' W
7 J6 o  l: j6 U8 |' }: K  ?$ Z
) e3 W) ^$ l- p' j; X& Z7 s我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

- f; K# V( r- L- m# ?- l  t7 ~) k" f5 V+ R; L% D) X; A0 x
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
3 ?2 {% I, K5 m4 k3 _0 t- T+ w- o1 R6 ]4 W/ Y* ^
" f- D& \$ O* n3 p& ]% J9 K
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

& t* i( F% a& g% t
+ y& w* q( w- K8 t- Qoh really...& p& l& J* B" a. f) z8 T
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
. i: |; K' u4 k2 A# \, Q  _4 a  |i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
" x- m) N5 `* h. B7 q2 `
. D9 t$ |& A# w1 k當然這是個假設性問題
9 p2 Y( F7 c4 n% q/ h5 S, a但將人數倍大
8 R' t. D7 i7 W  d例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
8 C  y; Y* g, w  G(情況可以換作其他)6 t0 h8 E- ^' G1 U% b
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...4 k% a9 s* @$ h, G5 |$ {. ~) H
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
: R* Y3 K! C2 D$ D3 W: G, L如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:' i  u2 k$ q3 {# V3 k
絕情谷既問題...0 B5 i9 o( N- z* ~1 {( B3 s$ b
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...$ @5 i- M2 }& a* t" g3 j, B
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

& K6 F# e7 E1 @% m
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
& {- l# P" P# ^, R( R- V於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
7 {" G- D  l* M' V但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
2 l' |, X/ @5 A: R( g' M好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
) A0 F1 h1 S- [& ?其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
1 r; B* ]2 l% e/ _, h5 V" l4 H8 o  B+ ^) c
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命; v9 g- a6 ?& y* Y
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
: [' [- u! j* V& N' O其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

6 u1 O2 \. Q5 o1 S5 G  q1 b$ S

4 D4 t5 s: n; v! @6 |5 Ghaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
" g7 M; `5 s  T* c2 L9 P& \- Z+ Y你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
& ~$ M% r6 h7 ^" b, H+ _
& t$ P* c* n* O# ?8 ^p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
- T; F$ {% n+ ^yes, my reason is helping more
& A4 i6 x0 w( s3 y5 Q. O3 c: X) ]for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
- E  r; E: p+ W# n3 f% U' b) pif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
) z  C. G7 d/ k+ ]" n3 W4 @because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?9 P) p) d# B- q$ m+ ?
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!  n7 r4 j, C- V9 k
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!" V! i/ b% X2 W
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
: T. ~1 @# R# N; \當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~3 [/ n" @, e2 j% F
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
" Q/ F5 n6 p; ~/ n) }$ `. H$ ]正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
# M5 _- Q! `3 B% [8 ]即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
$ y, F% `& m5 S我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
, U  {* l) a+ J3 @( }" \' T但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
" N# G& ]% I" o我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）