Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
& f  e+ v4 m6 p, ^# B
6 \5 e8 ^7 j, W6 A+ v7 D& a3 f3 M" w: s& W' R- g6 B; H
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

/ F+ G; D4 F) ^  u4 i4 i$ R; x
; k4 z& y% b8 M6 J: V9 v  o
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:% e; s' d( a) N& n

% j' ^2 j' B0 U7 |' Y% s: W$ \3 b* N) X) }# Y6 o# u3 x
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

1 g5 U/ e) C9 p8 C/ b
7 v9 b1 r; ?+ O* R7 q& V
oh really...+ w8 P1 C: P# d- \. g& t" G
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"1 @) _9 e6 h, l/ \$ B. E- V4 _
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題% K, n0 D. Q& T' O. a
. d6 R9 ^2 u8 o9 o, m0 m" r2 N1 J
當然這是個假設性問題
6 M1 k, t# v% s/ h" ^但將人數倍大: c# O) Z, W* N/ h$ C1 p
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
. i8 g, j/ z; H, e(情況可以換作其他)2 h! B& o4 L$ L. a
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
, X- Y8 e' Y% b# Q如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...8 {8 h, j2 e1 t; f
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
8 q( W  F# F; d3 l絕情谷既問題...) {6 P9 I! c" n) b6 Z2 t
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...* H: X- p) L+ F9 R6 Y  W
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

: ~) X" J9 `, b) V3 x* z殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
, f( p  ?: L: o) V於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生1 g! M3 |8 a# P5 g8 y2 r
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
( r2 E* E( p; {& Z1 S$ Z/ k! q好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
* I. @- L) g5 ]0 u其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢. E3 ?8 ]0 V/ W" q
  x4 d3 t2 X" X' \; S# l* M
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
% G! y% k5 R7 ~+ u不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
# O7 H( D  ~' E. a+ W. m- {6 x其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

! m) f3 \) g. s4 [. ?' X: k8 L( h+ M, i
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
/ b4 D3 h- l2 n' E  `# z# U0 J你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
7 j1 V4 M# o' p6 `. d
! c9 G+ {, o2 U' @& x) K( u: {" _8 cp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
. M3 |1 k! O* ~* t- oyes, my reason is helping more
* V! @6 d2 E* ~: L: B& W" }# Hfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!- U1 m( B* ?2 O: z
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child& U, x" k/ }( n& J+ X# o1 Y5 H/ p0 v
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?; A7 E/ [9 B/ F6 O( d; z/ n
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!2 O& R  p; H% _3 G; }/ Q1 o8 r
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!+ {4 K  y+ }- E+ J+ U
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~3 N; x+ p: ~" f6 \1 \! m
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
8 M$ B' V4 c4 |+ o我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
1 o; h* x. y: c4 K- k正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~+ {5 i( v* T: d
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~1 p/ ~$ h, [9 q8 J
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
6 O! }* l- p- \- Q但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
& n" y: R- ^$ c: a% {我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）