Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
) Q% }7 N, D4 o, a% L2 I- J) q. R. B/ S' u: T

2 P) E! W% a0 l1 i+ X3 j我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

! l2 @0 Y/ x4 H/ L: m
$ [# I. ?7 a% |, _. Z  FIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:( y0 b9 p+ ^2 u9 P$ \

6 n  z& T7 H5 u6 u. j# [( T! q3 W% q0 ]- n1 T( F
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

, D, h" v, u4 d' h& [
# I5 F( F% d! B8 W4 t: h
oh really...
/ P. v0 [" C6 Q% a8 C7 ~/ w- zhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
$ l+ s6 C  ]" S: z: N- [' Ei didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
$ t  V: E4 l% d5 G0 g% d9 s  @; u. T* o
當然這是個假設性問題" y: U1 x7 R$ v
但將人數倍大/ _% _9 _0 ?: ~7 c& O
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個5 z% T7 @& Z  W/ U3 |+ N+ a7 g7 R
(情況可以換作其他)4 O. r% g7 M4 L+ ]: p0 }6 S
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
4 m6 S* W% M* x; }, {如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...% N( i  z$ a) ~, L; j
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:( {+ @( v6 y, h2 ^
絕情谷既問題...
/ R( I' A( |$ J& Z; K1 G: D如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
: i( g1 u/ v9 y; }* l' l, e+ ^如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

. ^. f/ H* o. n2 V  g7 ^4 H殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
" X1 }$ }6 {/ H2 M# h於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生7 s1 i8 f: O+ m, j& e4 W
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
! x3 u- ?6 J  Y* U- S好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
/ Q& r" M- D& X* I; D其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢2 _' D+ Y. c( e

5 B: R! @. l- j- p我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
6 S/ A. K$ O' `/ N; T4 {/ j不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
7 A1 K% G, H/ Z% h! C, g其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

. s6 u8 Y3 b5 f. p2 P7 K
, \% G% S' k1 E0 G$ o. qhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
1 \0 e+ Q/ q) `) S6 G8 X你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....4 Y5 ]6 `+ |+ g" m8 L

* h, a7 ?* X' G& k% x8 ~p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
5 I$ q" `0 z) }% c5 ]3 E1 yyes, my reason is helping more
+ ^) T2 f* n% @% @: C% T' K$ b# Efor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
& T* H$ R& E+ [- Wif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
- `8 @1 |4 L. b/ N  F# a6 Kbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?- U' T0 {0 K: B& C" p* [7 O3 f
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
$ o$ c, P8 a' w# {may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!. Q4 Z# L  ^' g" x% Z
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~7 `4 N* n0 p2 X" }0 D1 Y- K5 |# z
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
7 O: r3 S# P& v6 K; E& X我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~. f: S) s& a/ C4 U
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
) W( r, @" I. M/ I即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~7 u- M, ?' _( j2 H' ?7 ^
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~" O! f8 v: C# i8 l
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~  Y, i# u" a& z( p
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）