Rika

由最好排到最壞
! v# @" o4 T' ]8 m( OF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong$ y9 ~$ C& q& V/ m5 q: d
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount7 G) J/ t" h' Z8 P8 ^" l/ R$ }
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
/ a1 b* q; j+ {M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure# w* o( U' H- t/ P; n, e, G9 q
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
8 E8 j5 B+ b6 w. o0 X4 `4 v
% f3 A% M% p2 C3 r' zM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人  V* n- @& R1 b1 h
2 {! R8 x6 k) v9 E  h! s
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
, p; U1 w, ]" [     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!4 ?8 w6 B1 ?" M' \
: n- ]$ _. I5 l6 b; H
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
8 q& l  Z5 ?7 X+ B: O; l# |  `0 d$ n  _0 R. s' O% T
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
& r$ ~) Y( C3 \+ I) A  S; ^' u/ {6 I" m; c
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,  O6 W8 o# H/ e8 d
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好3 n# a! b% c1 [& u+ J
) f% h: U" N5 H7 ]2 D9 F# o
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案) N, O( n" T1 o; a2 w' {8 o
而家答多次
. }$ f# Z& U. v: L: c5 of: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
9 Q4 z( K0 N" Z* E6 C& \' `  l. ^; kl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
4 D5 c6 H1 @! Ob: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
& h- b7 Q9 Q: Bs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
1 F6 l' Q4 g0 P% x0 h9 U: ?" i# Dm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
% u" P5 p( n" f6 |$ i3 P# t4 b: A% u, g6 @
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大$ u# d) a/ M$ z) r9 t5 T
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
2 Y$ N0 M* C1 ]7 o' ^5 |* B1 jM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒8 c/ C, R; \/ e) v
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
- l6 o" g) h$ ?/ f( ]+ R8 ^; dB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
/ W0 V2 b- T4 m; r. Y* }( IF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
8 A- ^! a: L' d  cS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
/ b5 ^; @/ D+ X+ e, E. B" rM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
, v( c) C) a; K1 A! X' N9 bL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果* C- X7 Y5 n" ?" j- W- \
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情7 P$ ^5 D0 S' d7 A; H  n9 ~3 K- y
- u, F) F8 L0 {. p( V  ~
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:6 X2 s  @$ X/ Y% s& L
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
, P8 k1 n% T: U  L: e7 \4 t% zB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘2 l& d2 \6 D: s$ N/ m' f3 k
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
  x4 c  [" J2 t) z9 xF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方1 \- s( Z! `# e5 p& |) f) K# d. n
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

. L4 A" Y4 M0 U$ E* Z" Y1 f4 t+ k9 Q6 e8 J6 @9 T& B. _
same choices with u , but want to add some comments 3 o6 a7 f& v. ?( q8 R& m, P
. S6 t6 K$ Q" L! G* n- ]
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
/ e" i- B5 K8 I1 e6 k
/ M! P9 @" z! _0 @2 F+ Z. `& s" {+ lS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )  u" B9 b1 ]  ?+ a9 `7 B5 ]4 S- p
: ~' G$ O0 ~( g: w" q
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome + z& v6 z, Z9 ]1 S5 ~  U" v

$ D% A' O, k) ?' F: mM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......! v9 |1 b" o+ B" P

3 ~& \2 M  ?$ X6 ^/ Z  d1 ~[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge( h+ A" C+ b( o8 p# N6 ~$ C
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢2 ?3 U2 O( r) L) `8 w) l# T
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點4 ~% y6 i2 s6 Q9 ]. z8 Z. V
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
0 ~1 p- [' i( p& J: {$ r- w8 F. ~: Z0 b) a' g( L
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....- U  a" y+ x/ G$ S9 _# p8 j
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
# {  }1 p. T$ G3 k由最好開始排起既話，
2 v' Z! s  p- q2 B' A3 Z- KL B M F S 啦，  R6 D9 |' c: u. B! p

  j4 S8 _! M. ~& N( B' }+ n其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
4 S* Z+ m' O) Q( v但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
. O. b# S) W. D7 i& `9 M如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
. h$ k( H+ m8 k7 w又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。; ^8 v+ n  Q# [, s- h
! o7 @/ o' s4 X2 x* @% T- G& Z+ I
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
' U" ]; M: e! w  d( K4 z' q所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
! {  y( T$ a2 h3 X9 E+ o. _6 w明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
2 F+ U- P5 p/ J1 h+ j/ D7 S+ o3 j5 B
. s1 t! {' ]9 j" u! i% f而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，* W1 q0 t: O+ b1 z; S
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，$ J( n$ ^- n* o2 V% i
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，* |1 |3 [* l3 j! u
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
$ J! o7 T2 Q, J9 i: L* x M 都可算壞了。) g( Q) Q$ B) D# Q
' a; Q' G' q) K. W  h
F 呢個人仲掂，
' Z- O% r* e4 T/ _/ B知道既唔等於要講，
# v. g7 l! ?0 Y8 g7 [; _如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
  t" p+ c$ q! A4 ^: I我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
, D. [5 o4 Y! @. U5 h. L" D
5 L- H' T( N8 q+ d2 I* F( g6 J" ]最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
: T( |9 J+ I( i! \% B! o始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
$ f; O/ f2 g3 z) |$ @1 B6 v
( J" F3 x) M. h" G3 o. t3 ?7 b% e5 a4 z8 [: z3 E

+ `3 w4 b0 i5 N0 b- j題外話：( o* |8 _% e, [' u  ?. ?, }. Y
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
( I* N, j5 Q1 t9 q( o( Y: W睇到 S 呢條友，( Z2 V# n6 `% N; L
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L" O* G  x' K/ R

- V2 r4 L' q! Y2 y5 MS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!+ k; k# [: `8 W
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
4 z- f7 [- ]* V& \7 ]3 `! i( u1 jM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
" b) G/ G9 U7 a! l: m* s! S5 MB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
/ S0 i2 r  X+ f, O; K1 y8 R9 pL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...