Rika

由最好排到最壞
# a  {$ P7 x, |! C/ ~1 O: cF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
% X* x1 c) L/ ]2 I/ C' TB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
) m" c1 x# L/ h0 X" x6 M  B. Y# ES, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her* h# i" R+ V' t; u3 e
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
% K: Q7 G" q* @, }L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:  `; o+ V6 f2 L
- X+ ?% k2 T' R8 l3 W5 W; p/ N8 R
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人  Y' t8 |# s* z* }; T+ w  h
7 S3 E  ?" Z! [% ?+ |2 ]% S/ q
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)7 z# o% M. j+ `  V
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!* |- N' t; n$ C2 M# X4 N9 k
; Q$ G9 L' W# w$ q8 j
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
& Y' E) H# L1 {! p7 n8 T% b- A
( T1 c3 A3 G3 @& VL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志" e+ y8 H7 v: f$ e+ I' Y

% q5 J3 F9 h1 q5 U: a2 P. l' h, {F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,8 l! J8 V; j7 M) K. `2 x# k8 U, \( x% p
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好$ Q& ]/ \3 S: {1 a- h1 ?% i2 ?
! `+ W, s; d: P
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案5 ], X' m! q& w; K8 D% L6 S  ]
而家答多次2 b; [: T+ D* m6 U1 p) {* P8 z
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽$ y, l7 N) w( u+ }3 b& n" X! R
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架8 B- F. j3 v6 k
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢  P* k0 X4 |! P# }5 d
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
# \; t5 X* Y7 @7 n6 l( c% r& ?/ km: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S8 A- A; s. |; [5 b* H

" U' z5 I$ x! `# d. c& O+ yL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
; Z% o1 ~! F- ^/ F1 ]$ rF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度% o2 D" l% {( P
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒  d: V# G2 F' r: F% \; d
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
/ I+ ^" V& O) u. e2 g% bB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
: \( G8 K$ A) D$ c9 [6 S, n" ~, rF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"+ l( R3 z% `8 D
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取# K9 q: l0 n& u" z4 [, G
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法& ?+ j; o7 b7 `1 i
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
0 ~3 r+ g) T) D6 I1 mB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情6 p  k0 @$ s4 f5 @8 J
/ n. L4 K  |& k# i. x- E/ |5 |8 p
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
- k- U. B' F! IL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己, P9 @) S+ |8 b7 e; c& W
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘- k8 C2 l" ?! F! N3 ]
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件5 @  O* p$ J& i
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方+ @% i: [" f# r
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

# P+ O# d4 v9 ]/ x, h
' ]: a( e% r: _% d9 I8 I; F! l same choices with u , but want to add some comments 5 i# c! v; Z6 q& _- i/ f  ]
- }7 b/ P2 D8 j- |# w
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  + n8 P6 s5 A  G' ]2 b; u  G

# |9 Z; E0 T$ K( D& o2 \S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )4 ]/ P* K9 {( q$ b
& ~8 L, w- O  T' h/ p' w7 p/ G
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
( @* q$ Z( z" y* g& X. I* L5 Z8 V3 i2 J* Z  K$ G
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......+ r: B: t2 F* @. u* [4 |' Q6 O# A

) e; }, x* j" F- b8 \. R[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge( V! i3 i6 _% }! z# r$ Y" v
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢9 s6 |0 d( @% H  e; f
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
* p! t7 {1 O' g( u. z& n, ^F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma) Z2 |; J1 W/ w& m% F& x  A
) _7 C$ Q: O) C" W
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
1 w0 o3 M& N5 ?% P# V6 u+ S有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，8 Y5 |# }; l/ C4 V2 B
由最好開始排起既話，
9 I2 |" ~7 h. m. F; r9 ML B M F S 啦，
5 u4 |: x3 ]4 q( f/ \) s* }& A6 Y, j' I& n% Z: Z+ m  B0 M
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
+ d  t" h& l; [- b* `但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
( Q5 k( y0 s( g5 G! E3 l如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
9 i* s' ]5 ^, l2 |又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
, ^$ h7 d% q7 J, ^) _# D) E1 A: k8 T+ s8 L% E, z
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
) k$ o! }& m7 Z! A3 J/ H所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
( D8 J5 z: m6 e明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。( c/ L, ]6 F: a' b

; [. M7 X8 L  c- U# a而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
8 X1 \. b' S2 L; z, P, V3 p M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
* `3 T+ \7 t% a9 s- ~亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，' ~7 ~; n' J: }+ @) _
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
# X( h  B$ A+ ~" ^. z M 都可算壞了。
4 o: D, V$ `6 g8 a  n& A* I+ P! t% S" }
F 呢個人仲掂，/ \# Y: ^  M7 ~. I: E0 f4 t: P
知道既唔等於要講，
5 e# K& p8 b0 R- @) C; I如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
: F' O" `  z$ X' m# B我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。. G7 I5 t# Z8 F  S1 u* _

8 z- ]! k3 |4 q$ X* R7 H8 a最衰個個緊係 S 啦，( r" R3 H# H4 a4 f: B; B: ?/ l
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。! y1 @8 E0 s0 x, J: m' e

1 e/ U( e( K) D3 v& c4 l% S$ x2 R  c  G& R$ q; b' q! U: k
  T- v( F3 d2 ^$ {. U
題外話：- ]/ x! d) U" ~6 C$ U
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，# C. l8 K, u8 y5 t7 r8 d
睇到 S 呢條友，8 E  F) v3 C: V
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
% ~1 A5 X* u0 {9 T( ~- P2 m, o7 }* [8 g
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!. b& ], @8 e& S; D1 c
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
# t$ Z1 B9 J1 A1 H% L8 uM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她+ z; p1 |# P/ z% B
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害! a, o( ], r- }' E* X2 H
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...