Rika

由最好排到最壞3 M; G7 o' g/ m
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
: q! d" w- a' j+ ^B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
8 n- F1 T* {$ m7 p/ C/ n3 }; mS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
- ^/ C- Y% o+ {3 WM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure7 |* r" p/ ?. Z
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
/ V* H6 J" I$ ]; h
0 H4 m1 q$ u; XM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
. R7 b$ w+ J" T3 n9 k; j4 a
1 \* K* f, N6 v" U; y# kS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)& Y; ]9 P/ S  Q0 Z
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
7 b  O$ @7 x4 p5 j: n, L' d9 \  O
' Z8 Y" K4 ]7 c: J8 Y; ]B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
3 A  Z# S; L) v7 K+ e+ U1 N) T/ Q- E2 N7 t; \' d/ C% @& `  O
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志: A" l  [5 n5 }2 _; J+ J
  T1 R% y3 h8 ^/ Q, P7 K, F
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,; B" n, |5 n- v) b' }
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
% [  o' k1 f) [5 Z2 J' ]6 M% ]: b: Z& h1 r" O) U8 \" r
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
4 j) B5 u  O7 }+ `2 [9 V而家答多次; d3 F* Q: D8 a; c4 ^* _4 w! v) H8 O
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
, u4 i6 m- v8 Q! ~8 B! Y1 R' Ml: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架5 F4 n1 p+ M+ s; [8 }5 _' o
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢" g+ K. Z7 X0 x  y! Z% b, s; M
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
6 F, R/ l: M& `( N  j& n4 ?$ hm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
) t' h' {; q9 q9 N6 N# j) J" f5 A  l
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
& S3 s& ~7 x7 x& u- HF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
7 m4 e8 n+ \9 cM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒" m6 q8 S- O1 Q, A/ s" z" Q
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢( \' P4 I* L* Q9 @, R! W! D
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞, Q7 C! D) c9 x
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"* I% q0 Q7 j+ O4 T5 g. S' o
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
- l3 c5 E& x4 Q6 _& o' tM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法  u) H- }/ i8 G0 u/ m' t7 U& @3 ^
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果  ~9 ?! }% ^+ A, P7 q
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
+ P& J: U8 o: V( P  q, D! Q+ f+ N! m2 m/ @6 O6 F6 z# [
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:9 C4 r" H1 [5 b3 V6 {6 {1 X
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己& x0 i7 f( i) [
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘1 F& X: L  z$ i5 c
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件% S5 Q$ p3 L* m, ~1 A& u+ i
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方5 B' m8 C' J7 `- V! L( M1 I
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

1 j& f! w4 S- ], S# u/ g
' V$ x# h7 `; y! o same choices with u , but want to add some comments
# \7 Y$ q) a- y; M' L
. F! U& C$ f* _* N& ?/ o$ r% yB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
6 {8 d; f: p8 ?% V1 A' C7 F- ~
6 F: \! _* ~' R) s$ u/ `S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )4 Q9 w! o6 G2 j( z

! X" W- b) m+ W* D' m3 aF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 7 l, `: K. a+ l# s3 h) [3 @$ j

9 b8 W1 @/ Q  S6 h( w. ^M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so....... K2 F2 i7 h4 |, ]8 i! p
5 E" `9 p3 y( D5 m( D7 N4 ?
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge. n- c- C- m) D
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
. y0 g. O$ Y6 k  q, RL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
  M: T- C4 H8 a) KF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma; s" J0 d) q0 ^. f# I
  c7 z/ l( ^' Q, ~6 A5 U5 l
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....# ~1 r  l4 K7 h3 X
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，( a" v& j0 F8 L$ M7 B
由最好開始排起既話，+ u0 S" w7 t( I: D! h
L B M F S 啦，% Q/ S$ p! @& k$ f1 s

* c4 f3 ~. |  W5 U* H2 W其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，* K3 n/ j& @' ^, R
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
) o, K% ]1 q2 P如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
1 S6 P/ W: P! a: ]4 L又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。: }% |  k0 A  A, f/ G9 Z$ A
! M' Q$ w7 |7 d& E. p
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
8 o/ M5 u4 n% a$ ^所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
; m# @4 u$ ^# Y明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
9 M* x# {4 l- O  N+ p, _, a$ D8 T" X8 v* y1 W
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
, D' |8 U3 ?( F M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
. r" x+ O% B" U: H% P: [3 @# O亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
8 L4 `+ U1 e  ^! x5 O知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
+ e. m- `8 s1 |2 y$ [( W M 都可算壞了。  \0 m" P! u8 X! o
  a& d2 q& n0 Y9 {* S: ?- f: h
F 呢個人仲掂，
4 u7 E" H+ s+ I' G; f. i知道既唔等於要講，# g8 x. b$ W: |
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
. S1 ?# M0 p. H. n, U7 R! B. `我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。7 |9 t1 ^2 w* u

: S7 R8 P, b+ W6 E5 j6 I最衰個個緊係 S 啦，  z, i0 a- i5 x# y
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
7 ^6 K6 L4 F3 D4 h) @7 n; f& T' N# J1 x* o- ^  k( A+ p

+ o; i7 L* R: h* a6 t4 E
1 _/ H0 E: t: E3 R1 ~* s題外話：3 T0 l8 Z+ q% A, W! t
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，/ a1 S! R8 N! M$ P7 |8 [
睇到 S 呢條友，
# V1 l! x" @' c" W我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
* K4 s/ X* J* H# @4 D  E
1 l! C. z/ F+ x3 n, G6 D6 @S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
; g& F+ [/ b* R0 z! d: MF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
% ^( T* n8 M2 P. C) LM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
* d+ {# N$ ^( Y0 v1 i9 ^B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害: l6 j' M! D* M) S% @; T9 ]% O8 i
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...