Rika

由最好排到最壞
% d9 ?) L9 d( ]# o+ {9 rF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
6 s% a8 j" }- m+ c( A4 `9 X9 i) S5 n2 H" CB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount% y" I5 h7 F3 G. B
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her% }+ x% k2 N0 g4 W, ]0 r
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure7 }$ R+ \1 W& w6 r# t! l
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
7 q' C: x7 ?* J% P6 b- a. B; G' P1 A7 e# e/ J
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
: w) H, ?+ n0 e$ x9 C* u
6 W) t/ n5 `: v# _/ f0 tS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
* _" q% \: K" d/ _     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
7 i% \' U8 Z% c  L/ v- \0 P( Z- m3 b- [" `
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
3 z5 T6 I6 k1 K: D0 v3 y) _4 W- _* ]+ B! Z: K0 u: L
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
2 w3 G+ s, o- g, m% h- T4 M# G" ^: ~; N$ i: Q
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
6 u& W1 \* y, S6 `) E     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好5 q1 O4 V& D/ I6 [
7 P) |$ g8 l) `+ d
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案. @& N) W9 e$ [  ]$ b6 f6 I3 S) \  s
而家答多次8 ]! z' @- Z- M, F7 R& c6 S
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽/ s; f/ Y1 i2 J0 ?  l
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架6 ?; F+ W+ h6 U; A0 ]$ w
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢  M  S5 {( O6 a' X
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
  X$ X  k* A' F/ d( g; n' \* Lm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S" ?8 Z% u8 F  H8 y
# N. c: I" G1 f3 @4 G, u$ {
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大4 t% u+ Y9 K3 P$ o8 K4 G2 a! _
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度2 f8 K! K9 ]+ ~  d: _' Y
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒% \# q& J; L% S9 {
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢1 g  e6 k! x% M9 W* Q( o$ I
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
, q3 _: X  V7 f1 FF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"$ [' [, W2 f& Z7 F) Q
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取7 Z9 v6 C4 r' x8 `. n6 T
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
$ k3 H8 _7 A$ t! uL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
7 ^, A) \( b7 I$ F+ DB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
9 v0 b1 s; K; T' [- ?/ i  M
5 q+ A$ o2 o; U, n世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:5 D* N- d& w6 X1 d0 R  Z. D
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
; f0 C' F' ]! n# V3 RB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
8 \3 l- s3 a5 f% Z9 @S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
4 g8 b+ Y" Q( q. n) H! l9 [% b% UF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
5 _; ~% p5 z8 \! `6 d0 tM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

4 i/ m: y9 u5 Z3 v, V
' j+ }6 @7 ?1 L; i0 c same choices with u , but want to add some comments
$ |$ k5 Q5 U* [. l4 z
; t' @! u2 c/ L1 }B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  # g0 t) e4 p* u* q
4 X4 c! U5 H9 |* Z& |
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
+ D; Y1 t0 V# }; b7 ]
! x$ A5 h4 A& T. MF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
6 a- H, U1 s- w6 e/ H3 z. E
; Q3 z! [! ]) FM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
" C% \" o6 }' @1 q
# E1 p5 F. k3 H6 A7 c[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge6 j9 H2 d( L+ L; [1 @
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢+ }2 {# C& F6 f0 y7 t3 i/ F
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點" _5 g6 ^# A) \/ c8 w
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
+ \1 h6 t2 e0 f; {4 H1 F9 {6 _  T1 G/ f
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
4 k; j4 Y7 D6 [' q, p/ H; x4 V( I有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
- r2 p, [5 C' V, T/ c  f8 T; @由最好開始排起既話，; C" R7 C& v' d5 `
L B M F S 啦，4 u# w% @% x- v
4 Z2 F/ C8 o  E! P! f! E
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，" Y) X6 M' A: b& d. _; T- d
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
* t3 C9 h. a2 q" g. ^6 H$ e* w9 D5 X如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？7 i6 C) `* p/ _' r* \& U5 B2 F
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。9 l$ ?2 F$ t; x: V% ]; S' ^4 d* ~
( |+ M7 o1 |: j- o
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，" Q( l- c1 V0 ]! d# G
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
$ o$ L, c* j1 u# R明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。) o6 b, y- ]8 Z1 b5 n% e$ J

+ ?" }3 q6 v. I而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，: a0 |; k5 v  Y. z
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，5 p3 {: |. A  \) R
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，& N% W8 `- Y! O/ @# a! ]. @  o7 [
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，+ f2 L) s7 F1 s- ?  Q% E; K
M 都可算壞了。2 A0 P' Y" M' R* g, Y
3 F& o9 G  O7 F. @5 e
F 呢個人仲掂，& o& U& c6 x0 o, N
知道既唔等於要講，" U- \. ~1 y1 M1 y% z$ D
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
7 l3 [2 F! n$ b. Z我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。6 }& U/ }4 i7 Q- x$ K% ?
" w( [" ?& E. X4 m5 Q
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，7 ]* s. a) [' L+ Y1 V8 y  t/ i2 v
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
% ~8 ?; n' @/ [8 M# B: L
% b% d1 v, W$ {/ V9 d0 X$ D9 x) T# L# b6 {4 [0 b+ i* q
, B9 k. E# f$ N
題外話：- ~+ j3 D3 v+ l* ^) o4 }
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
( u4 M, u# O& F睇到 S 呢條友，
* c3 p- e. ?/ V# u1 y+ P我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L3 u3 d& x4 R1 c  g# t  c$ M. [! K$ B
, C+ ~) \2 b6 V+ L! E: p
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
1 x$ R2 M* `- D& a  sF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係, y* y% |! A  @. I0 Z+ O
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
& Y$ s+ G! t& w* F1 v2 o7 lB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害/ d# K3 L# U5 z( \
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...