<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)5 f) n' c" D. G0 U2 }
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:& _. e6 l) m  E. X( a! ~) F
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
) d* B- ]2 b3 {2 }) Z2 p! ^1 e
I agree you points that it could be illegal2 J; u+ R0 Z+ M2 O: U0 O& @
but that is still a "gray area"
: u1 M0 w/ ?0 @' B) Mwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair8 Z- E' h0 w( [2 w! F8 c8 G

; v( [% A8 L/ T, ^: W+ sanyway, I want to say that is
& _8 \8 \0 }  p- L6 {who is supposed to be protected by laws
4 \3 @; f) q' L8 t9 S9 s, S3 Ycreators?! q6 ~% m0 f+ E3 f! Q* t6 c9 B. ?
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
( c* Z0 ^0 |1 K3 |' W4 Zlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.6 o% `. `0 ]* n! |3 \" f  a
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those* h% @# Q( u0 E* C/ G: V4 W
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:4 j9 b% j' m. R
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
4 ]- s' E' Q' \. K) Y: ^我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
. n& W, n& S+ |" }- l
& D' T, G2 T/ j& P我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
* r2 U+ D, Z& P0 B! `0 r% ^$ J唔係喎!
: \1 k* t" i5 w古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
& A0 G# F) j* s2 V我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
5 w+ k6 z; D' O0 k佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
* u1 W% @$ S1 S* x6 z/ b就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
4 Y6 d% X, l0 C8 B' b一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!7 B) T) Z: F' }- G5 c  f
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
. K, Q; U% w7 m) Z; wif so bad, dun download la, right?. U% X- B, Z1 y- I0 M. |  V: L6 m
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
# b  D% @, G# u! S+ v% w0 t  X5 Gbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct! A% }6 G9 {8 Z
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la4 T( `2 {6 t4 a- O  J, T
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
( H5 T9 Q8 Q0 H6 l* H7 v. s: `1 S& Kusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........: t  y% e+ W; U6 ^8 a1 l! F
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!, w" @; R' v3 w0 w4 i4 B
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
5 W4 d# X2 F3 }佢又唔係殺人放火~~~3 U: W& ~# i+ g6 a
政府想比下馬威0的人~~6 C$ y8 K# R' x1 W# F
錢就一定罰
. B( }/ d) U' i+ o/ E9 e( z未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,+ F+ c  U  V, ]5 J; O6 W. e
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?! s9 l. z1 V, @/ |- [: y; A7 c
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?% O' i+ v0 s9 P- w& U
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。