<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
- V6 ?- G, J, K- Q' s0 p但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
$ j+ m% F8 }( y3 i1 @6 a& q大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
6 b  R, e9 K5 v% E! o; j4 GI agree you points that it could be illegal
% i0 W; Y6 e4 [$ q! c) Y$ `, {but that is still a "gray area") f$ G4 ]# v: C1 p; y/ {' N
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
1 v/ I8 g* R- S2 b" w& r- e
) l4 e* l- ^; B/ R* j3 z) i) @anyway, I want to say that is8 Q' G3 Y  M1 b; o
who is supposed to be protected by laws5 h2 f# l- u) ]$ Z( |
creators?
1 q; T9 e" d3 i0 jbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
( \6 v$ O2 {* M* c9 G5 ~) |let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
$ [: }1 L3 P8 K3 ^. a  z0 W( Wwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
1 y/ ^; l0 f( @0 C5 EWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
# k8 d, m6 Q3 A. {其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
- u9 v. U+ ^# R1 l& t3 ^0 X& g我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
8 J2 j% a. k- d1 L8 p
8 `: Z# _) f2 H& b) N我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
( y  A7 A& C% ~" J1 U唔係喎!
( Z7 r3 F# I- z+ l+ S5 V2 a* A. h古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
1 F' b6 K) l1 k; q, t0 Y, F3 s" B) h, `我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!  h& ?4 s( e) ~! P2 J/ o
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
2 f# X" K" p/ @  N就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事& F7 I/ K" V  K
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!% [& d6 A. h5 d. t5 s/ [
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......- p/ I0 q$ b0 S+ H
if so bad, dun download la, right?
4 |) z: C; T9 l8 fi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
3 K; R4 M' t$ o/ G$ Y+ ebut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct0 n6 {. M+ }% h
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
+ Z( ^4 c9 F( p1 ?/ ^( hso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society+ j. \! m/ f6 @) r
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
9 L8 Q8 R! |, q3 Jwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!( ]! L; S: T8 |. {) j
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
, P2 y4 G0 \9 [" `佢又唔係殺人放火~~~" ]- O6 h) B. v: d; N
政府想比下馬威0的人~~, b9 d* r1 C/ |/ [
錢就一定罰/ n, t6 Z, L5 ^/ v; Q( U
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,% \. `0 ]1 x+ D) _
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
. ~5 R) X" S" J( u! X: ^7 J* \佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?8 m( n+ Q1 n0 U6 b
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。