<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)2 v! V, v& [% L% d7 V
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:' F& F7 c. `) R
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
. W& D7 r! E- p# J% X( _1 q  @! j* X  cI agree you points that it could be illegal! g* ]8 `1 _9 f5 z3 U5 ?5 I
but that is still a "gray area"; o# h: x" h% \) a/ r7 A0 E
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
8 N4 M5 N" V& M! ^6 ^( [0 b  ]
7 j# Y5 i3 M& s# Vanyway, I want to say that is0 S' k' L' c, w- P
who is supposed to be protected by laws
% h: {* P5 {6 z  z+ Jcreators?& e2 H. {$ q/ B. S6 w( `
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
; i  z: E* X3 E7 klet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.9 V, g4 N" ^! e" r" m, K, x% }
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those+ Y+ P) J9 i" o9 z
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:. ^( M% D  f1 E. y) r. L. ~
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
9 I2 O( I8 E' d( {, Z3 ?" Z
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:' q) H7 z2 u* F% z% Y

% e, J2 w+ N  [0 U: [9 b- V我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
/ H+ k' ]% z5 R3 N- v唔係喎!
( h* W8 H  u& J5 n. }. P2 k/ M. W古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
! Q  X3 [2 N3 @/ {我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!1 R+ R( n$ Y3 k! H  z' m! p
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!. Q! W8 T' \9 b# I
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
, a# p1 m8 W" g一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!, L8 W7 N& V4 H; N; n! Q
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
- p" I* v* T5 h, }8 q  d2 X( @1 Lif so bad, dun download la, right?
% P) {  K# G  ai am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
7 B  u1 x; X- \4 `# E+ wbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct7 u& T$ @- f5 B0 z( ^6 v: P" V; h
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
7 Y0 x2 {$ Y! h2 o2 xso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
! y% E# g1 v5 K5 x- ^5 `* ~using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........$ N1 j3 F9 M3 a( y
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!# u. V5 Y5 n6 J% _( _0 [) H
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!" T0 T! i5 w* m4 c
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~; s4 j# C. d; F  W/ @+ ?
政府想比下馬威0的人~~) [. g8 f+ B, F
錢就一定罰
9 G) l3 @+ f; i/ X/ J) s) _# r未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
5 t2 x" N) s; w+ r7 Z唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
2 _3 b3 R7 S2 `$ i+ f佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?2 a9 v8 ~9 ]& F  d
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。