<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
; {5 p7 D* u. w5 o& P; e' B但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
: j: g& S- F' J3 a  z大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
- }, ~( l- e# h% F, \6 t, l
I agree you points that it could be illegal
4 M9 W) I" b; q$ L. D6 Zbut that is still a "gray area"
3 x5 m3 ]( u) r$ X; q! @# x; B4 Wwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
/ N. ^" w+ e# n. J7 B% f. j
! M/ H% z% B$ _- `9 Ranyway, I want to say that is
) S- N  G( o' u3 E2 wwho is supposed to be protected by laws
1 T; F  ]' i# l2 c9 y/ Tcreators?
; R0 V) J/ C( J  N7 h6 Cbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
: H1 ?8 O, u1 H$ B4 W! Wlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
/ e. g- o% @6 j4 Hwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those! Z1 j0 B( I. C! J
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
3 Y. ~. S: @7 S, H+ ^4 m其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
! K5 Y/ X4 u! r3 f
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
7 H. }6 [* u- y
% U2 ?5 o* k' `0 o: d& K& q! ^- M我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
  T- K6 }, N$ H0 t: H
唔係喎!- U; Q* ~) B, r9 ~* o
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!9 ~' l) i1 q1 `; k& r
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
8 {' ?0 H. E8 M# h. Q6 e' {2 A佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!, f$ E$ {6 Y9 I/ ^- p/ m0 I" h
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事$ b. i) H5 U: g( {; U9 Z, F
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
; C& i  i; U' b0 W3 A# cdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......  W" N# c- p, ?: q" ?& D* `8 r
if so bad, dun download la, right?
2 \+ q0 q# t% d9 i) u, }i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
$ O' P0 l3 I' I% H; _but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
& W0 W; F2 @1 x7 ?6 m- Ono need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la) J" h0 x2 L7 ~
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
0 L; W% t; Y% E0 Busing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
% |: w+ @8 M# A7 V! Pwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!; v3 ?6 e7 ]% {9 Z( e2 k# L
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
: r5 T+ A  S4 N5 ~5 s佢又唔係殺人放火~~~" o* u  \" |" @+ o
政府想比下馬威0的人~~1 T+ {; I3 ]" }/ F! S& Z
錢就一定罰
9 Q% s# m2 b& A5 g1 B7 P4 X未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
5 R4 T/ p4 J/ A3 o- Q2 ^- u7 ?唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
' o% f/ R4 P6 i: |佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
  p8 \6 J8 h& [* u到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。