Rika

由最好排到最壞, b: k" R9 }4 ]& H" m) w
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
6 C6 Y$ O& ~& |! s! _8 PB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount( w1 M# t' O6 M
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her# p9 D! \5 x: b8 J0 r8 ^
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure+ ~" G+ v  f0 l. ~3 r* C3 L, o# L
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
0 i- r* ]3 L4 c- m1 G
5 o8 K# C, F- T# ^% _0 CM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
, m6 e: d! n- x+ g4 {9 K& ^9 V8 m, L& L, A' s; [/ |# u
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
% E6 Z5 d" Z4 a/ F; A& L     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
8 f9 M5 `/ ?" ?, z
4 h5 q3 o9 J! |* F3 @8 Z1 W6 eB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做( x. m  \9 r$ {
0 b7 p* M: S) k; p" N
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志& `) b/ c& c9 k4 `7 s

# ], ?! @( w2 o' |, L9 G' BF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,% b  p* U; d7 T! q7 V; Z* T
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好+ \& L, a) z" v( m

, x0 D+ m- u% z( {7 T! p8 R[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
- a  g7 n. N; f6 c7 c4 i1 g) [而家答多次
- W5 v; n* ]  [) y0 h# P. |f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽* S5 F$ f% u: a0 ~7 O. A0 R0 X. b
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
: i  J" y/ S) `+ ~b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
, p' K" k- U4 l  y) N, C$ L" \s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
# b" H2 G$ T, Z7 z" `m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
/ L! x% V# r, I3 c1 s5 n
# L4 |+ s4 I6 G5 b( |: J+ D( K) OL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
. F- [, o  }, zF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
/ N- R1 h% O1 ^2 b2 Z8 w, ^6 cM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒% P# }: n" W3 J/ I2 |; ~) R- t
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
6 w# X$ J$ N9 H! m) ?B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
' ~" l6 Z# T' S; VF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"0 n' l9 k& h! [, a. h
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取7 a  Z4 q$ j, O* C
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
* @, G, y' T0 k6 u. a) hL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
; o% R4 }3 U$ zB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
, u* D' g( F, _* q: Z
. p/ n$ a4 K$ m0 G世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:3 {( `* E+ _/ f$ |+ o2 }5 F$ ]9 Z# D
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己( \0 r+ C3 c5 x/ ?! ?$ x9 ^1 Z
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
2 N% O6 Y' q4 F, i4 V4 l" `S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
- ]- a9 `4 u. LF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
  \8 D( }! j& G% U' ?M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

1 t! O4 p: d( I
) m7 C9 A# a  J2 O, d% x/ ` same choices with u , but want to add some comments 8 [" j( E0 m1 w% o" v) t

8 [+ B, z+ ~( Y& ^B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
5 z' i, X0 E2 T" J* I0 N. s
" C# @  t! a/ C% vS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
9 u& o% r, }  V. O
% S# l* [5 a1 OF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 2 J% t( s0 p: G. c% Y. S- A( Z3 [
, y9 x* ]" o+ E
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......+ L! |# l; H- Z9 C6 E$ v6 s- |  O

! k. ]$ [+ m9 D9 h[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
3 J! M3 x9 m8 {: BM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢" [5 s$ ]6 A8 I5 t+ B
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點: h2 j7 V2 P/ G' z2 N  ]/ e" h; ^
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
9 _  _; T; x$ o' y8 E" X% y' L1 z/ c
5 S  c5 M" g) k& n! [7 H3 l# q! A最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....% E2 }4 |7 t0 V: P% E5 P) y& @# h
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
& s# D& F9 C( }由最好開始排起既話，) S( }8 J1 D2 j( M1 i- O7 g# o% {1 \
L B M F S 啦，4 s8 L$ _+ e6 H

( ~& R* m6 d1 }; [. o  L& `6 }' B$ _8 n其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
# ~7 q& S3 ?$ ~+ D1 T. w( g; n但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
+ q' d/ t' G4 z- I1 t. k! ~如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
4 R' L0 ~/ r, ^  \* H又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。6 K  n$ l+ r9 H  A: ?

& R* ~$ O7 ^, y/ s  T2 z而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，% E0 y* r: d2 S
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
2 ?# W! N7 E" S+ L明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
( {1 ~* K& H5 W8 _' O8 M, ?0 L4 G% q# D) P! W0 ?% b
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
1 ?) [8 I! U* N* T; C2 u M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，8 ?& a6 i" v( w- U  B  b
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，5 i6 y  C( w" N1 S6 _
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
& h9 I  _8 O6 U M 都可算壞了。
2 V0 B2 `9 E" E! b
( ~* E2 Q. Q+ w F 呢個人仲掂，
" h  s; A  M. L3 s% E知道既唔等於要講，, @$ {7 ?8 b2 b" D9 W
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
# o6 J! K0 F/ q$ {8 k0 p我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
* y' B# G' ~( a! S$ ?$ ~
% a( D) \& N7 `" j9 f. R0 B最衰個個緊係 S 啦，6 K! w: @, t1 A0 }
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。" ~" b& e2 R0 A& H7 {

/ y% A+ }( f4 ^+ y) }& {; \) M
( D; j! S* [" u( P
* i8 M& n( r( h$ ^! o1 h0 `題外話：3 Q( L5 b5 p  ~! [, {% U
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，8 d* \! e; A+ }% w9 `4 K
睇到 S 呢條友，
0 g' S6 m" q) C- f2 q  G我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L0 j0 Y* ]7 h  \9 C( a# R( x

5 a1 w) }; q6 Y+ US: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!8 b  f; T' f6 s* s, Z
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
4 j: Q/ o7 a2 g. k7 T9 YM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她0 h5 [+ u0 a7 }7 k
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
* V% ]; b" o/ N* `( B0 ^4 m. z6 K4 lL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...