Rika

由最好排到最壞& w% f* `( S  i% J. b1 W5 _5 s# G1 U: c
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong9 K7 i3 r; u$ \5 O; M: l
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
* G" i: p- \% T  h& FS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
5 c0 j- N% b+ D: @8 V$ M2 c1 SM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure4 l+ P3 A3 U6 z& P0 n7 k/ w: h
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:* X  Q* _5 b( O5 Q( I

* k0 C$ g' ~2 n% IM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人+ _: Y5 I" a$ q, X( X; E
& D, a: @( m; k- x$ g- J
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
4 r* [- Z2 ?7 p  t) n3 S     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
( F5 m! m+ y6 J+ T( Y" _% }; b4 L) u' _1 D5 S
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
6 [+ {, [  E& R! |! q# U, L
9 B0 x% B8 d  u8 x5 g0 }L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志+ [* W8 K# X9 a: e3 \
% A6 a+ s# U8 M) B
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,3 J( P  n) T8 y' x# G- {6 t, x
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
7 D  R: R% Z5 `  i0 u1 x. a% B! x& h- m1 k5 y: K( I3 X1 [& E
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
+ [* o# m# \4 y3 h+ S而家答多次8 H& T; {& r8 F6 Z) m, [1 ^7 S
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
$ n/ o" H& a- ~' I  V) P% Y% }% \l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
6 k2 M; I6 G7 }. w; I) Xb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
) `/ G9 f( J9 Ys: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.9 O1 s7 ]. h6 m" h- p
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
9 R5 {0 L* K; v2 @6 l3 F/ E* M* a) b4 q( G
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
1 q, g# B4 j" I- zF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
1 x6 X) Y/ I# j' g  j! AM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
1 Y; |( W9 h* `% iS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢. K( T! {4 I; x4 Q6 T8 m
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞! ~( W& `- ?+ y& F
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"1 c  w9 V+ M, p1 T1 C
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取$ A% c5 f7 ^) Y4 W6 C; i# P8 M( _
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
* K- M& S$ Z+ U6 q6 W! LL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
% L/ f3 O) c4 zB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情4 F- R3 P  U5 n. x4 u  c
$ X; R' {( [* |& I: Y! |
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
" c' N5 g2 q2 m' _& W2 tL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
; Y6 O8 o7 g4 h# A& E) nB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
) j" \, K: j; N0 M- tS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
% Q$ D  Y& N3 O" i. r3 ^* l+ c9 MF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方0 E* O# a0 G/ i
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

  O. g# o5 F0 ?7 Z
0 n4 K  t- d: ~4 y4 {; v$ a: H same choices with u , but want to add some comments
, L. k9 t$ i# Q0 @3 G5 _- D; y3 S  B9 _
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
3 z/ i8 \% ]) A4 m; b/ H
+ }* n- @; b5 ~8 rS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 ); V: y! x: Q  t# n' p- [- |
8 D( T8 i; D$ s. K! b0 h7 U
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome " i) g3 l% W! T$ f4 @

9 W# P. M$ b) m$ H3 N+ J# j+ HM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......* S9 [& d& T3 N7 m7 S
; Z+ ]$ M) `8 I
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
& }" |' e6 @4 W0 T& j8 KM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢& \& m* B% |2 Z+ D/ z- K; z( `  z
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點6 P' |! Q, E& |9 x9 B1 ^
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma+ i; {! g5 X# T. Q* Y  [! z/ U

" ]) P/ q( g4 D8 a0 s5 |最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
% I+ F3 A1 V- q/ e. c" w" ?6 D. _+ Y有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，. B2 f6 `- X% t& E( `5 d6 {+ I" k
由最好開始排起既話，! Y- a0 k7 E7 t6 L: W( y
L B M F S 啦，  q7 e4 d- ^4 K6 R' B: a  U
6 n) i; k5 f8 E* y- }
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
) O- A1 P+ ^; O+ y" x% o) C但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
5 @" r) x6 P) G# _# L7 l& M如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
/ X- c7 }- J' I, b6 T又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。* ^; D4 z" w9 R( M, r9 h

9 l+ D) d2 f$ b2 {而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
8 |) _5 U7 K4 c1 y所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
7 w! C/ U- h& p7 m! j( m明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
7 G+ p5 U9 q( y- A5 C3 E& z, T/ p
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，8 \' `- d0 C2 N8 M5 B- ]! ?) [2 y: w
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，3 x6 g: l3 o- K- e) R2 I
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
) p6 h4 F+ P. M' ]9 ?+ x( w- R知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
3 _5 K0 \/ K( s. X M 都可算壞了。6 B6 j( B% i0 I+ s) i2 |' ?
* p0 S0 |) _2 r: n) x9 G
F 呢個人仲掂，
7 c* ]: q8 r2 l. v知道既唔等於要講，. L  W- H- H! r+ Q5 Y0 s3 N+ B
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，- s! ~: M3 l6 N! @2 `
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。9 r2 X4 L5 D. ]# o0 z

7 n/ V- E! G" A2 q) _- s! m! v0 }' z最衰個個緊係 S 啦，5 R: K& h* ~* L- T. y
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。8 k: D3 J" C. t
( K% l7 s6 g" T5 w

1 ~1 W: ^2 q; r2 X! q9 c/ M6 @- V9 f% l8 s- n+ w
題外話：, b& \8 J' e4 l% e, S* e* n( s
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，5 i# m# i" N6 ^0 n' N
睇到 S 呢條友，
, N  e% a1 t# ~* B0 }* b, d我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L+ X7 G7 j* j6 z5 J6 B
1 G/ P6 a: C( t3 j. s8 \$ C; t  _9 D  _
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!. K/ P. ]* X9 b7 g8 M2 m; |1 N
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
0 A) s; a, F$ z# Y) q8 v6 s6 ?M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她, B; N2 e' P+ X/ p
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害5 \- {$ q1 n$ [% U$ s- {& p0 m
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...