Rika

由最好排到最壞
6 l2 s. l4 A0 c* v+ EF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
$ r6 ?) }, a- s8 L  TB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
. c) v! W$ |2 p. {% z* U& V0 FS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
0 A$ P& h  M! V+ b& ?" t" F3 DM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure) X$ x; y1 N; _6 ?' T
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:8 A  ^- u  m! B" l0 x

$ V  x. A# F- B+ F( FM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人) }4 H4 B* h( ]! y% d1 ]

+ r- S% m' b. K( J* M+ WS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
- A& y+ u4 l: o9 w6 I4 c3 P1 x6 g     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!1 {; k# r8 H. G0 u6 O7 @

+ }2 k. V  n, D/ `  v4 m1 @B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
* `% k' Q& X2 j/ d* r: v- g. Q! u# w. U: z  ?
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
" w* U/ W2 a6 D/ T6 j* t# Q; W1 y/ Z
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
9 ?! V" ]# ]" o  h: M     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
% E! h# [/ ]' Z# o9 b1 B) @
8 |: m! H- k% v. N5 {[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
2 [: M, R2 o: v1 ^0 z; D% s而家答多次% H3 C$ O0 I2 ~
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽: W: \5 s3 d7 Z  ]8 d1 C3 d* H$ R
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架4 B6 G2 H5 c! G% c) ^9 u  W
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
& X1 Y/ n; u7 y5 `, ~) Zs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.7 j  G1 ^1 L+ z( h" E
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
3 P* d) F9 @; k: B2 N; l$ Y$ c5 P$ `* d# n$ ?
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大9 Z1 V; |8 b$ i
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度2 M4 O$ ]3 Y, }
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒* v# d: e6 l9 _
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
4 t# R* o" M+ w/ M9 jB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞! \& q3 Y( V* W3 U; b& l. l6 [
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
9 v, g) ^8 l3 E# h# ]6 \3 Y+ _* [S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
; `7 K+ K/ X5 D, O6 K+ T+ LM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法8 S) F/ I, s2 P: n
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
& C% x$ n2 o( V: MB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情% R# ?! M, t) u$ f( Q; `+ g- b+ \
' u" |4 }* d: |6 s  `7 r
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:+ \6 q& B( U5 k
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己- F3 b0 ~. T4 U! y' a7 W1 |( ^
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘1 J' b' A+ F- r9 }9 s2 g& R
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
* A- P4 ]& X  I' EF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
" ^' D) _% U1 s5 B1 zM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

  G/ ]* w5 d( `) y8 S1 H: \4 T7 `4 _
, z- ^* H4 T; o/ z1 `
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
# _2 {4 p) m4 W$ F0 p" a
7 v8 k% Z* L$ B$ p2 b7 a& |- aB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
- w4 X: m' W7 y' `6 F  z0 {* j: Y$ V1 v  d6 J
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
# y( p1 |; r4 y$ c1 y
" O' l4 s/ s- m3 z! h$ |, bF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 9 q, I% U4 A8 r: ]4 \" ?% w

( {. _+ y4 r7 [6 ~M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
* q( l1 A, D2 N2 s) k. ]! Z) p* l3 U6 f% D  u; @  `( T9 s
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
7 c0 e1 T& a, G) ~( z. uM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
! M2 ^4 r. c6 G7 Z. X, kL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
! Q0 N$ L, Q* E3 |1 |' e% u# mF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
- f1 @1 {- S/ `; e# K2 o) j+ {" H0 ~. g; u, J4 D
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....' B9 k5 ]) I2 P% U! @2 S7 B
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
$ k: j5 I# ^; z9 ~由最好開始排起既話，
6 y$ [5 P0 X2 @, X+ FL B M F S 啦，* g5 u9 F' V2 i" b/ J

8 k& F# @! X3 O其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，9 E, Y5 w0 \) C" k+ m
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？2 i( [% ?3 f+ ~/ c( J
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
" ~% t0 ]8 W. Q* T/ Z, N又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。& c( o7 F& l" e" K; v

; l7 n# L5 c& K2 x# l! G而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，4 y# \1 X; X* T% F
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，" ]* a' T7 E0 z
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。8 x' ]( g" f( r( q
0 e' n# x" ]% Y! ?7 c
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，8 i6 H4 R, W& z; i% O. Y/ I
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
. w) N/ L* d8 v7 J' v2 l亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，& m0 l" t/ @4 X, A
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
+ X: c* W3 t: t! o* x0 O/ h' T M 都可算壞了。0 G. f9 r5 K! V5 _. R
! L8 L3 I0 O# u1 S+ s& o; q; C. w
F 呢個人仲掂，
/ V) M$ b  m8 ?# z) ]  F* R1 e/ N知道既唔等於要講，
4 K1 i8 [/ S! X) _! s如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
) g% c$ `2 k$ d2 E# T% E7 ~6 B( K  t; M我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。! @9 S9 @$ U1 x* N! s) c

/ M5 N, w  K8 O$ m4 D; T最衰個個緊係 S 啦，4 S" ?2 ~9 a8 D  T
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。  @, a$ |0 k. q

1 m% u7 s* `/ }* Y7 o. |7 U+ `1 n( J9 [1 h6 d; r/ n: v/ j: ?0 c9 p
" L8 r8 r( h) ~) ]; I4 R$ _
題外話：
- y1 D, |/ K9 |4 U8 C# G7 z唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，6 j, r* u( l+ r4 z+ m
睇到 S 呢條友，" I! C5 g& `3 Q2 N+ b
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L: h# Y1 s+ ]7 [: L4 X: i2 z
# w# J/ l+ o6 W- G
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!# W! @, K6 b: w6 `
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係2 O1 x% C7 G( ~3 r4 ^) X0 L8 [5 y
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
  A& B: F- U& v" e0 n# |$ V6 `; bB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害. E; d) q+ y" V
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...