Rika

由最好排到最壞
9 ~- O7 x8 m* [0 t) xF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
/ `+ h+ X, t2 B# v9 y' {B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
+ @! g& L: k# X, _2 `/ I/ W+ e! DS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
5 @, ?& c/ G: \% Z  [8 @M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
" p' J: s( ~: x* d# I9 X; ]; |L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:! Z/ d0 R1 G9 G' N9 s0 C4 X1 ?9 h
) S  [! f- s8 p# A6 Z" Q
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人0 [! U8 Y; i5 }: f) a* G
+ v" @2 Z0 m- P$ v7 v
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
1 I, ~: @6 M# _8 b% C3 ~1 S     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
- q) U- o, Q; i. Z) P$ c5 o" _, \- T) s
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做! P- Z9 E8 u5 T

1 I& X( L( ]1 R$ U  O! X: iL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志$ r& c* b& V3 H9 `. Z

1 W# y. O% S4 VF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
( `/ b1 I$ x1 G6 s0 e     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
, @6 U  |' Y6 ^2 G/ Q* @% O7 f" N, f6 u: C8 [4 `
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案$ T$ F8 J: Z8 z" u5 j& ?; X
而家答多次
* @7 q! g2 ?+ V8 Q" }" Vf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽! e% o* \) |) @8 x
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架- g+ b, j- f* \* j9 u8 F* x
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
  _+ o2 e! |2 C% vs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
6 m: W) x: z5 f8 ^& ?m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
0 F. V' i2 I0 z+ [! d
$ Y1 ~. v# i2 |- U; \- _0 TL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
: A/ s$ x3 W9 U$ E! V4 m0 `: FF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度- X2 C0 C& }9 U9 t8 G
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
  `# `+ t% H1 @9 y0 Y7 nS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
, u3 M6 [9 Z# Y6 W9 Y" f5 i, OB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
7 U; n! ~6 P5 KF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
9 C0 w! [( P; I, A" d+ _7 N+ C4 f% o5 eS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
( G6 x  L1 {1 |8 Y- H! F+ bM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
+ {% v* y( M! JL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
' w- O! Y5 p% ]B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情% Y) Q: C  {0 w+ V
# V) }" P* h9 X1 i0 P1 }
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:2 D/ G1 G; g' N- P% w
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己" V% D% [3 S( m
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘% A5 O9 e9 c9 ^) F& P7 f2 }
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
4 h% y% o* D5 S  }$ B" pF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
; M* o! R' t9 x0 q4 _M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

* I% m. q6 j* o0 g5 Q7 e7 m9 W1 W* m9 [; z" Z, Z% h0 r" A
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
& b1 V0 o/ C- l/ L# A
, L! S5 s* p% X: k! V- s8 \6 LB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  & j0 T# l# h1 J) C# D) X

7 r# M+ z: |+ n( h& D0 OS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )1 P7 `8 z% O- n# n+ M

% C. ]. x1 i8 X, M% K1 ]- sF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
0 J/ e6 l! ]- P. `, z2 g; b8 `# W
2 l7 R& z4 I4 d4 S. |7 Y9 eM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......3 H8 }! m1 ~  U, R3 f2 z: Q) C9 u2 _$ a
5 X, [$ I& F2 q) m% o& Q% ]8 y" M
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
/ W9 s4 Q6 H  P% L' M- W" \; V5 B5 jM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢" C( E/ |( |; Y. u3 W
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
! k, e& E( o  {' C. YF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
6 Q1 c. |$ ^7 p( h' H0 Q4 D9 L+ f' Q& I* o# t1 I
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
7 J0 y8 o; p+ A& M- e, g) L有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
$ C+ W$ g% U- }由最好開始排起既話，
$ }7 G( z, p- p: H0 fL B M F S 啦，
$ o& J( E% E- r; J. M, r0 K* f9 I' \5 v! U  s
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，4 V' n! p+ B: ~5 [3 B/ A
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
7 |) l" k$ k* N+ L) X) F, d如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？- q% p* ]3 o4 ]5 O! {  A/ Z/ q: y4 C# p. ]
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。; c3 g: V0 F8 I

; J  n( N1 d; G+ C. c$ M- v而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，1 [4 S+ a& f7 t
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，! Q% k1 m% J. ^! C  n/ @* ?
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。+ J, p& U( U8 i2 B
3 Q! t7 u: }- {# r* e8 m
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，/ _. J3 z, G" f4 e& Q) B5 W
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，8 i1 g3 x$ k' }4 G7 Q* e
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，$ h% T0 g# T+ D1 S2 R  }" R! l
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
8 G% [' Q8 z9 j6 Y* `, y M 都可算壞了。
3 }- y9 h# ]( ?8 p/ t" c& @* j0 U% w4 c2 C, V' Q; z
F 呢個人仲掂，
' S0 F+ V5 }/ @. Q" T知道既唔等於要講，
5 S* w' o, ^7 M6 Y! }如果呢件事發生係自己身上，: c! Y0 }8 l9 g2 P. U
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。* Q  j% B3 d. I$ l# Q! R. m

8 I8 N% h6 q, b& m" p最衰個個緊係 S 啦，+ X# ^7 ^8 g; s* _
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
  e3 I1 E" Q- X& o: n3 X
% a2 f$ Q& Y, Z) s  Z3 c! j
  X  T7 g, h( c% B
2 `$ a* |- Y# L  Y& ?0 s題外話：  q  K  P- \+ Y
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
% g5 I8 D/ ~$ }6 g' K1 y* F) n睇到 S 呢條友，
, g' e1 @! ]6 }6 [$ q我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
" p- C3 v# e5 Y5 y, ^% Y1 a; O4 F' W' c
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
0 \, o, m, e3 _: B+ s/ m3 ]+ ~F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
8 P7 t2 r& S  s4 [  hM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
: d/ f  ]9 s/ R6 wB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
' v8 f% u9 f9 a- i5 RL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...