Rika

由最好排到最壞
7 x9 W- `' y4 h8 y0 }8 F6 kF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong" B3 p! W. \0 `: o0 X
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount! e0 c9 k( _- x5 \" E
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her/ ?9 f& y; z$ [: C7 H
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
: W* ^' l: ]! \' ^L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:1 a! ?" S: e) f, [# ^

; q* F- k" h2 Y  z( l  K, b. \M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人  b4 a& ]4 ^. G4 D* t
  K( `7 M9 _5 N- X6 g8 {# I
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
9 ]3 k! h7 ^6 u! Z. f     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
' L' W9 e* S. W2 e. M/ v, T3 V! y5 r! s) t# M5 O  A7 K
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做& V0 q2 z1 A/ B: I$ W
5 C' ~6 i. J5 ?
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志( ]! z  e. x. x' s5 T; @

# T) L2 @) V! x/ lF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,$ E- ^1 [& t) V
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
) E( l0 x( R% g8 U2 b
. o, q2 Y3 B+ I" V[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
" ?- Q; E/ u7 l  B3 Y6 s* a* u而家答多次, [$ |  b! n! a7 q
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
6 a) {% p% K1 W: ^" ^l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
0 @8 ]& Y6 h% @1 T5 Y- `! ub: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
6 K7 V& H: m7 d6 b4 ss: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.; S  W+ Z: c+ ?# c! u  m+ ]
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
6 F, b% J3 I" ^8 N& Q6 a
' L3 J3 z* m" o2 e9 @L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
, d' V! y9 |$ ?4 Z, tF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度" B2 R9 c- `5 o$ T0 g% e
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒. B0 G7 D) Y' a+ N) M
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
8 {! d  ~; W" H# CB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
. Z8 U8 ~+ ]& ~F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"8 W7 l6 Q* j3 g% G# e/ C4 ~/ w; v1 g
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
; i- `$ H+ ?; H. Y3 t6 L3 Y3 yM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
, ~2 O$ I# @! L& Y# j  _  xL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果2 E2 c) n/ p! q9 [8 B$ L
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
# t  E. e9 t" c5 `/ Z$ d* @7 ~+ @( o3 U1 G+ r, R
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
# j' a4 A2 ~' b( k* i5 XL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
' {) G6 u/ F1 i9 RB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
  p. J2 {$ O' i' V* Y1 v- |2 b$ yS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
) j" w, h- ?  c% v% ]' [F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方! n/ \7 Z% g) w/ y
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

$ K9 i3 n1 g# U) q  t8 a
. f, l6 T6 M- x' Q) }& s
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
$ d  L6 ]+ g# @% H
  }2 t6 O3 s$ s/ A+ }B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
' U/ ?9 G5 y; d- V9 M, n$ O
0 D1 R2 n, N/ k$ R" wS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )0 U; `& |% m8 ?/ u6 Y6 P
& A& W5 i' q0 v6 L+ y; r/ H
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 3 ^- m5 Z" R* |4 b8 C( R

0 c9 x" H# H( ]* {0 aM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
) C3 [( k) U4 P5 l0 Q' E( z( c
9 q6 M; h! Z, a' z+ n[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge& \8 G5 @: W. ?; E* b" y1 m4 |& N
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
! l, |1 K9 |# Y$ h% R7 `# JL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
6 ~) x- C! Q  kF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
9 }: ~) G3 r4 ~! V2 a( H
  a3 Z! j  v+ q; m, B2 {最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
/ t: M# h. L- u" |有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
/ z+ B; o; a) R4 c: m& M( ?由最好開始排起既話，# U0 ?2 h1 P" q9 O3 w" ?
L B M F S 啦，0 v5 x: q/ P' A/ {8 j- T. \

2 @# ~/ w3 w& M# E' Z( b% u其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
7 K6 o7 j2 G( S. x; n, J( ~但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？  L0 H: _- X( z; u
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
, Y7 F/ b& R; `9 u# Q/ y  z又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。" P! G, O/ p5 P$ m8 T6 H& S8 }) a

8 a4 C+ @+ a8 u" W! S2 w而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，5 ~% B' w# ^8 c% ^
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
+ z/ Y% X( |# k3 G) s明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
4 d0 v" C# ^. D) k! n# Y9 j- E& L: Z# @9 x
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
" x% t" r) v5 H: t& f M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，! _8 C% J) d' V# @; X4 y+ }
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，6 f* t: J& Q: ^# S3 B( d6 \( i1 f
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
* o5 i* o6 O8 O5 Q8 r8 O! s' T$ m M 都可算壞了。
8 b  C6 e7 k1 x0 m& O
( G" _1 H) y2 c% g F 呢個人仲掂，
" Y9 N6 C3 ]/ O4 s4 E知道既唔等於要講，
. }% H2 C# ~( I: i如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
6 Z3 J# c8 u2 Y+ q4 v6 h我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。# @- }+ R5 m5 z
4 ~7 e' @% l- Y! X5 c7 e
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
0 q! D0 Y- R# A3 M$ N始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。" w/ d5 `) U6 K0 c1 O# {5 }

' b5 P$ O6 R& l# B# c7 I; R0 q* K/ ~! J

' X& {: d0 J( W. n4 l+ c1 f( n題外話：8 |3 x; z# J" V- V$ l% A3 r
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，- L- {7 Z: }$ M: [
睇到 S 呢條友，
: P6 m+ L6 V! J' o1 O& o+ L" D我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
, X5 O/ a) K: z( U+ ~! G/ }
3 G) m( u8 U5 F2 R7 y0 r8 A# uS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!! f! K$ k! `. D# A% l& ~; e$ r
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
. h. ]- J3 \! Y1 H7 X% P+ MM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
$ V8 o$ l; `; W) o+ O4 E9 @B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
+ l4 p6 Y' @5 O/ YL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...