Rika

由最好排到最壞
  l1 c( @) y2 T4 ^$ M5 T# HF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
: ]& K9 d- [. c! ?) ~- ^0 DB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount& V7 q6 K& k5 m% ~8 Z  I
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her0 X. I# O* R8 _( j- ^) W
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure) ~$ p% B5 y" F
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
, u9 E$ w( m+ v  y. ?  b- `0 J7 D/ O; }
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
* D* a' a6 L, L0 ?2 q0 _1 X/ N1 }' [9 A, M6 H6 S) P0 M# q
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)2 X9 T: B1 M5 r1 G' A1 x" b
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!3 [' x+ W+ i9 K+ i4 @8 d
1 s5 Q5 I& t* D( \. c
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
/ U. i, N5 C, G( p$ X6 b8 ]& ~) X9 |2 ^1 f, f) L, E  N$ ~' M+ {+ Q: }, }
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
- C5 |' Y) p$ |; o& _. f: V# I1 o! @# d. h* l2 \; O
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
& d0 o2 x+ r) S: x     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好; E" P* Z0 f. P

% U5 x+ {+ z4 i2 Q% o[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案+ y: o7 r, \; m2 v
而家答多次
0 A2 H6 p4 K* \( T/ o! a3 s0 v* Jf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽( {5 N4 P3 _1 `
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
. ]; }& D! a7 p: D( D# }8 pb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢# T1 t* s' G( J
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.) A6 R* `0 ]: E
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
: B# {! e/ p7 z8 p6 F2 ]) R* {8 [: c+ g
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
2 d: `. ]7 y! U1 i6 m- RF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
+ K, H( L- `4 u# h5 y! K6 u& F% SM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
/ K  O  Y& j( s9 }& yS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢" H5 G) |: u4 v7 M4 f: n
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞4 Q: }+ n$ j5 ~0 Z
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"2 M) J  B+ F4 r- K
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取  M7 E* H- X, j/ _2 Z4 d
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法8 |1 c8 Z, A6 d  C' l
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果1 i& V% F* G: S! {+ R
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情7 S) i% }7 J3 G) y4 B0 n6 h
5 m. }/ U) i; E- G/ z) A
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:5 w$ R! U' h. J# s) U# U
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己7 L1 m+ x; Q- F- ~$ e" _4 t- Q% f' l; S
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘& K0 g9 g$ |+ A3 ^) J+ s2 O, e
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
( T! E3 c5 `, i" W3 K8 _$ vF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
: [! E# z; \: W) R" {. C* sM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

5 O5 g6 P8 B4 Q$ O+ P
% ~& T, y2 h% ]3 r same choices with u , but want to add some comments ( n' U  i& y( b# `: j
  ?; E6 u3 i3 \* J
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
* ]; J% _- N: P! H7 F; O, I5 ]) V( m) Y3 v, H
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )3 ~( r2 x! `: p4 }( P

& d+ ^. i5 G# j/ mF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
$ X6 d; g7 j5 O' v
* F( k2 z1 I5 \: F: Y* |0 D% r9 C& LM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
/ Y' T/ i, S; L* T! Q$ h( g: X# W( @8 `5 O* U
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge) q4 q- G6 {; b
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
6 J$ {1 u' W( f: {' E8 }  z  jL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點1 x8 \- R7 S" r0 @8 B9 O: l3 \1 [9 X- [
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
4 N9 h. I& t* t! b2 R, `" r+ v, f  q
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
0 @3 f0 D+ @- Q/ J0 {1 o# R' |有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，* `. h) H" p9 G$ \! G$ e
由最好開始排起既話，
) ]$ g, d; D; }, `L B M F S 啦，
1 p- i3 y* \0 e5 r0 M9 b) E3 b4 B! a, L( f1 ~9 u# f  ?7 H
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
- z9 V: O- A5 Z6 S1 g但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？2 J. S5 M- @' o! D- R1 T
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？4 }' b( e! x3 f+ Q* N
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
* W. _8 g% E( a8 W. h4 \; E% G: A7 W+ |' _7 d0 m- b3 x- u4 A6 B
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，8 C1 T( P& q" V9 V! z  X
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，" C8 U3 \- t) l& D, o8 D' [3 i0 a
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
6 @% q7 ]5 f3 |: _1 r& d3 x) y& I* l) o! T5 h2 g0 B
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，6 k( x* ?* `* U5 _
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
6 h+ J1 e6 k' l7 J, r4 L1 ~亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，5 j0 I' p3 a2 l3 s; `5 v
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，" _6 L8 ?) u1 o6 e5 @
M 都可算壞了。
! ]  o( w) m. [% v. j7 V, B- b: Q' r" P
F 呢個人仲掂，
* _- i& C5 S; v. G知道既唔等於要講，) N  N4 t5 m7 ?$ D- V- i* W2 M  a
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，% z4 l2 {' j6 k+ \
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
: r& x+ b8 K7 G( Q) c7 I5 t5 X- G
# A. ]( C) @: N4 K4 k最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
: a. N' q# n, d3 Y+ D" h5 v始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
3 `+ H1 ^6 E# ?2 v4 K) \+ I
4 ~2 t) ?: m0 J# [/ c6 [! z0 V' c8 n* @
% r. ~& L& X. K6 M
題外話：
( K& @6 x' B% q' f# {7 n唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
, s$ G+ @0 y  j* `$ u睇到 S 呢條友，
$ u* v* g1 O: `4 U* c: s& a* _我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
; k5 H: G- q! _! m9 g
' f, e* _$ @0 n4 gS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!2 Y: r1 i/ V4 r  B3 G% l) j
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
7 D7 T' z7 C$ i7 P9 ~8 CM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
! |- A/ Q, y. i8 J0 z  u9 \6 yB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害4 v$ [" G' n6 Q+ w
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...