|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
& B8 I, T8 K! g) W, v5 l; L }/ `1 O; }' O1 q
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
" u; T8 c. n0 I P7 @7 ^2 H, q1 l+ l2 a+ x$ g& J" {
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,+ v: e, h- U+ P1 B! j5 J; x
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
$ x# {- G9 h' O& L% o+ |0 @- ?5 \" T6 G
' f! Z* ~% \ ~so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險6 ~% g; ]: p6 r3 R
% \# ]# M: x. ~8 c4 w# S# [- o
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, , B" X( Z( m& G4 F+ [1 D# w& ]% S
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|