 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
d5 E6 P, ?- z6 j9 H m5 N9 G7 N y+ _( q7 P
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
9 R7 O( L' Q9 m' z' p& p8 A# H5 k4 p4 y" C
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
, D7 z( a* i- {" {and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.7 j1 B% d- h# {7 b) _; i) `
; ]3 G5 L: E V. j
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險7 V% w+ V0 h* A0 w- N& `' J5 \
a6 M& W: E+ c4 U# p$ fin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 8 z0 [. Q5 Y; F' k# i7 F! e/ T
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|