|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.5 P' }6 ]0 U% a( X g: i& V- {
6 |$ B# l# e/ v3 z$ _% _) gaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.: Y; Z+ n2 }" P. J1 T
" z8 c8 I5 U0 }; M* a* S
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
: m2 L+ w0 w3 O2 _4 }! c$ uand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
; z" \) t/ A$ f; |5 j+ g
- K! Q% A* C7 }6 U U. N* ~( ~9 Zso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
! ~, V6 L, D" `6 Q' f3 L8 T( ]8 T5 b
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 1 w; K% j) d8 U6 \. d9 O8 |! H5 I
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|