 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
7 \5 }' ]! J, v. {
; E# o* ]/ ]7 \1 b- p! b. jaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
$ t. ^( }* ^4 F+ Q; [& M$ D* m4 r- ~5 ^# u
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
/ Z* P* i8 t2 L, E/ e2 Kand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
9 h& K$ A) h$ {+ T2 V& _$ l
3 h2 e2 M( l! q% L! z7 bso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
3 ^( D! a9 i" ^, { e; E+ _
5 P4 P, v' V8 h& C+ `! W5 Cin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 7 [" m6 P1 P$ M" I6 e u! r8 [
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|