|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct., X% T# A2 E5 ~
5 v* p$ h8 x# f; \according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
B4 {. A$ a2 J1 E5 g1 d6 Q5 @; i0 J# P0 f9 W
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
5 F4 V* O: |: H3 g, R4 I1 eand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.8 N M4 Q) \. }+ C
9 K6 `$ u I1 ?9 C9 @
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
/ Z/ ]3 M5 e' n f9 v3 z0 `3 b1 g2 Z# S) C0 ~( }) g
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 8 R5 t% b5 T" n1 I
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|