|
- 帖子
- 4721
- 精華
- 2
- 威望
- 13
- 魅力
- 74
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
502#
發表於 2007-5-21 08:25 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2007-5-21 20:12:
未聽過 
不過係咪即係逐場加倍呀? 
係o既話過左5,000我會玩   ...
疊賭---Martingale........不過詳細講係:
Martingale
Martingale is probably the best known system for money management. Originally designed for use in casinos, this system has nothing to do with picking objects. Martingale is a system which helps you control your stakes. With Martingale, you can be a lousy bettor, but still win money. Please not that Martingale is a system with very high risk of going broke.
The principle of the Martingale system is as follows:
If you lose, you double your stakes, and if you win, you start all over on your starting stake. This means that you eventually will be ensured a profit. Follow this example: You've found a game with odds 2.0 for home victory. You bet 100$, but you lose, as the game ends in a draw. Next time you bet 200$ on a game with odds 2.0. If you lose again, you must bet 400$ on a game with odds=2.0. If you win this time, you've placed a total stake of 100+200+400 =700$, and you've won 100$ for your efforts. The 100$ payoff is equal to what you would've won on your first bet.
Fantastic system, or what ?
Certainly, if you had unlimited funds available. Or if the bookie would drop his maximum bet limit. Or if you have the sufficient cool when you hit a long losing run. Remember, with odds=2.0, you will have to wager 32 times your original stake if you lose 5 times in a row. And losing 5 times in a row is not too difficult with odds 2.0..... And even if you have lost 5 times in a row, you have no greater chance of winning the sixth time. Too many people think they'll have to win soon when they've lost many in a row. The fact is that the chances for a win is just as big (or small if you like) as when you started the betting sequence. Martingale is in other words a very dangerous system, and should be used by punters with large funds and no nerves. In my opinion, Martingale is not a suitable money management system for the average punter due to it's heavy level of progression
大家可能唔耐煩睇咁多雞腸.....不過唔緊要......其實艾兄你已經講左要點...不過其實仲有好多細節.......
假設我買大細....第一鋪用$50買大.....輸左既話.....第二鋪再用$100買大.....不斷將注碼加大.......假設去到你用$400果鋪先開大...咁你就會勝$50......($400-$200$100-$50)....呢個理論既論點係永遠唔會長開細同長開大既.....咁你就最後永遠都係勝出.....(果$50).....
聽落係咪好吸引呢....... .... |
|
揷爆鄧麗欣、鍾欣桐、黃婉伶、薛凱琪、關心研、鄭融、劉心悠、董敏莉、應采兒、陳文緩、林嘉欣、官恩娜、陳自瑤、陳法拉、廖碧兒 |
|
