vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:) r2 E2 }( c$ v* W& ?! X0 E- G4 o# O
反轉黎諗
8 J  }: B( `2 q& H- fps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版- x! {) T9 t8 i3 e- C- m( }
你睇下DC,X-box; k7 V' x! X9 o
同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比
7 o7 H0 E" j  f% s你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

4 x8 `- r+ P# ]  I1 O8 j
講中曬!!!
$ z, T7 M5 b( D
0 O' Q& [) O3 W+ J; ^; M仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。8 U# s; ]; g& X* j
/ m& k5 N, q' w6 _  d0 N
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:  n; V% v7 q5 S3 Q5 U( ]
物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

6 v5 Z$ i4 y5 _8 y9 io甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖! ?' j" i4 l7 ^3 x6 x  A7 w
, K7 r8 k- |) S; C9 ~$ b
要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps2
! q4 u* k# H+ ]" ~  ]8 S$ v8 z1 l" Z; {
其實政府今次立法原意係岩
3 Q& ~1 i8 p; D( E$ X# @. v但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權
- ~% f' t7 @) }唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管: [" ]. @, c  p! S3 S9 x6 `
- J2 L9 f) {, B8 r, n8 u
另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事
  Z3 O3 Y. z7 d0 l1 W2 n+ A7 _. P一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢
4 v  I# v, q7 ?眾所周知/ c. f* I) \3 ~! r3 ]; t1 F
ps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版
5 y- T/ A& h# O  }& P佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps25 v$ N' l3 a6 @3 `9 l* ^
到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
+ u: X3 j6 S$ x& |5 n) L! R) w- k. I/ _: \; z
講中曬!!!9 q- `( [6 G" {! Z* Z! m
0 \; s5 J" a- D7 C
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。( J4 \0 S! ?4 L  r% T* _- T

8 ^0 i  H" ^4 x, p4 G9 V* C* P; s講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

! o* q6 |$ h1 [7 ?; S& y
對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~& [0 b" i5 ~4 w4 e

1 J2 h/ g6 U( V$ H# Q" D$ hps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...
5 R0 |9 p1 E4 Q其實最簡單一樣野
6 s4 u! k; C2 V" S正版好似翻版咁平: N% ]' [; B5 Z# m( N/ p- F5 f
或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁+ |( O% h4 ^, Y
咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?
$ e# e, h6 X: a
. b" y" u: g8 SBut I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子
5 g5 ?% M# U7 K" V6 H) f0 ^2 r3 G8 q) F因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,
: ~- {; [# z# F9 o- h1 L但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法
- s, w& e7 l0 \4 O- r0 c+ S+ M1 k我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣  W. v3 p( X$ e$ @( I
再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..
( ~/ S2 G3 l. R1 j改機既用途3 \. S0 i8 b6 P2 a' y# S
如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉
6 U' t1 @0 k, @! ]" K" J政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~ ' r( M* X8 z5 l6 i# c$ t
我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』