 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:& @- f, N# M8 Z {% I+ w4 ?
* ~" F) \$ ]& D4 {5 M; G9 l8 @ w
同意.
% ~! P4 v) O( u- f但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... - [5 m8 |2 j2 S# R. b, f3 C; Q% b2 y; n' b* F! |" Q# `6 C* e
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
4 ^4 i* M; z, s: Z% TYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students; S# m: s3 M, w- {
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.) |. s: g% `' w& r" g
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter. n4 y: m3 R+ W9 [9 i) s# s }, }
7 X8 j6 b; q, Z2 b+ V1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law0 _! q i3 i- j; c l
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
3 O! Y7 y2 R9 d @3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published M5 }6 r* O2 G5 y0 m
" A" t7 d: P |& Z# |0 _
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|