 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:% D# S! i( h: Z T s) v) {
, J1 \5 J$ O) q, |/ \
& R. [' Q5 b# @同意.) l2 }. O$ E# P
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... & M) m( w; D/ Y# G" y8 b
! h9 H! @2 \( `/ E( Q6 F2 x+ {: p
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
% Z3 F7 k8 E1 R3 [; P6 VYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students4 T) u9 E6 |; c' B# {0 ^
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
1 x! Z* o' a9 i& W, ~As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.7 e2 |" O+ f# O
& D; j* o& Z- h1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law4 B4 T, K3 D4 H5 O, n# t
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper1 `* M5 }: P) E. q4 ~+ s
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
4 L/ F) Y j. n+ J6 }; d) ]0 O# c4 q0 p. p" S2 K) F6 V* b( y2 S
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|